24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4091 General Poster Session (Board #47B), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil-cisplatin combined<br />

with cetuximab in patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal<br />

carcinoma: A prospective phase I/II trial (FFCD-PRODIGE 3)—Preliminary<br />

phase II results. Presenting Author: Laetitia Dahan, APHM La Timone,<br />

Marseille, France<br />

Background: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced esophageal<br />

cancer is based on 5FU combined with cisplatin. The anti-EGFR antibody<br />

cetuximab increases the efficacy <strong>of</strong> RT-based regimen for patients (pts)<br />

with cancer <strong>of</strong> the head and neck. This phase I/II trial was evaluating MTD,<br />

safety and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate <strong>of</strong> the combination <strong>of</strong><br />

cetuximab with platinum-based CRT in esophageal cancer. Methods:<br />

Inclusion criteria: squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma <strong>of</strong> the<br />

esophagus, stage II-III, WHO PS 0-1. A radiotherapy <strong>of</strong> 45 grays (1.8<br />

Gy/25F) was given over 5 weeks. During phase I, four patients experienced<br />

limited toxicity to dose level 0, and treatment was desescalated to dose<br />

level -1: weekly cetuximab (400 mg/m2 one week before start <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy<br />

and 250 mg/m2 during radiotherapy), and 5 FU (500 mg/m2 per<br />

day D1-D4) combined with cisplatin (40 mg/m2 D1) on week 1 and 5. Nine<br />

pCR over 27 resections were needed to show a pCR rate�20% (��5%,<br />

power � 90% ). Thirty three patients were included in the phase II. Results:<br />

From 07-2007 to 01-2011, 33 pts were enrolled, 20 squamous cell<br />

carcinoma (60.6%), 13 adenocarcinoma (39.4%), 25 (75.8%) stage III<br />

and 8 (24.2%) stage II. Among 32 pts who received CRT, the main grade<br />

3-4 toxicities were esophagitis (4 pts), leucopenia (1 pt), anaphylaxis<br />

reaction (1 pt), rash (1 pt). Resection was achieved in 27 pts (25 R0)/31<br />

who underwent surgery. Complete or near complete pathologic response<br />

(TRG grades 1 and 2 to Mandard) was achieved respectively in 5 (18.5%)<br />

and 6 (22.2%) pts. There were 4 deaths at 30 days post surgery. Severe<br />

postoperative complications were pulmonary complications (8), anastomotic<br />

stricture (4), gastric necrosis (1) and infection (7). The median<br />

overall survival was 15.7 months [11.01-.], and the median relapse free<br />

survival was 13.7 months [5.47-.]. Conclusions: Adding cetuximab to<br />

preoperative chemoradiotherapy including 5FU and cisplatin did not<br />

increase pCR. The recommended dose level <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy determined<br />

during phase I could explain those disappointing results. We won’t initiate a<br />

phase III trial.<br />

4093 General Poster Session (Board #47D), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Randomized phase II study <strong>of</strong> preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy<br />

with or without induction chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin in patients<br />

with resectable esophageal cancer. Presenting Author: Dok Hyun Yoon,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University <strong>of</strong> Ulsan College<br />

<strong>of</strong> Medicine, Seoul, South Korea<br />

Background: The value <strong>of</strong> adding induction chemotherapy (ICT) to preoperative<br />

chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery has not been delineated well.<br />

Methods: Patients with stage II, III or IVA (by AJCC 6th ed.) esophageal<br />

cancer were randomly allocated to either 2 cycles <strong>of</strong> ICT (oxaliplatin 130<br />

mg/m2 on day 1 and S-1 at 40 mg/m2 bid on days 1-14, every 3 weeks),<br />

followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) (46 Gy, 2 Gy/day with<br />

oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and 21 and S-1 30 mg/m2 bid, 5 days/week<br />

during radiotherapy) and surgery (arm A, n�48), or the same chemoradiotherapy<br />

followed by surgery without ICT (arm B, n�49). Primary outcome<br />

was to compare pathologic complete response (pCR). Results: Thirty six and<br />

35 patients underwent surgery with or without ICT, respectively. pCR rate<br />

among those who underwent surgery was significantly lower in arm A<br />

(30.6% vs. 54.3%, p�0.043). However, no difference in progression-free<br />

survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was observed with a median<br />

follow-up <strong>of</strong> 19.5 mo (95% CI, 19.1-22.4). Two-year PFS rate was 63.8%<br />

in arm A and 55.2% in arm B (p�0.626) and 2-year OS rate was 70.1%<br />

and 62.6%, respectively (p�0.515). While 47 (arm A) and 48 (arm B)<br />

patients received at least 44 Gy <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy, relative dose intensity<br />

(RDI) for oxaliplatin during CCRT was significantly lower in arm A vs. arm B<br />

(92.7% � 19.6% vs. 99.7 � 1.8%, p�0.017). RDI for S1 did not<br />

significantly differ (94.1% � 17.3% vs. 98.5% � 5.9%, p�0.095). G3/4<br />

thrombocytopenia was significantly common in arm A (37.5% vs. 4.1%, p<br />

�0.001), which contributed to lower RDI <strong>of</strong> oxaliplatin. Three patients in<br />

arm A, compared to none in arm B, failed to survive for 90 days after<br />

surgery. Conclusions: Adding this ICT to preoperative chemoradiotherapy<br />

seems to cause lower pCR rate and higher toxicity during CCRT.<br />

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer<br />

261s<br />

4092 General Poster Session (Board #47C), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Positive association <strong>of</strong> gastric cancer surgery outcome with surgeon<br />

specialization in a Shanghai high-volume general hospital. Presenting<br />

Author: Zhenbin Shen, Department <strong>of</strong> General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital,<br />

Fudan University, Shanghai, China<br />

Background: Numerous studies suggest positive relationship between<br />

hospital volume and cancer treatment outcomes, the surgeon’s experience<br />

and specialty training may also be important. This was examined in a high<br />

volume hospital in Shanghai among patients who underwent gastric cancer<br />

(GC) surgery. Methods: Data on consecutive patients (pts) undergoing R0 or<br />

R1 GC resection in Zhongshan hospital between January 2003 and June<br />

2010 were collected and analyzed. Follow-up on pts who were non-<br />

Shanghai residents were less complete therefore excluded. Post-operative<br />

mortality, pathologic results and survival outcome for pts treated by<br />

surgical training, i.e., sub-specialized vs., non-specialized, were obtained.<br />

Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test was<br />

used to determine statistical significance. To determine whether subspecialty<br />

surgical training was an independent factor for overall survival<br />

(OS), univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox<br />

proportional hazards regression. Results: Total 5,046 pts underwent R0 or<br />

R1 GC resection were identified.1594 pts had complete covariate data,<br />

survival information and were included in the study. Of them, the<br />

sub-specialized group included 217 cases treated by 3 surgeons, while the<br />

non-specialized group included 1377 cases treated by 52 surgeons. 5-year<br />

cumulative OS was higher in the sub-specialized group (62.9% vs. 54.6%,<br />

p�0.032). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor stage(p�0.001),<br />

location <strong>of</strong> tumor (p�0.003), vascular invasion (p�0.001) and surgeon<br />

(HR�1.54, p�0.001) were all associated with OS. The incidence <strong>of</strong><br />

positive margin was higher in non-specialized group (2.0% vs. 2.7%,<br />

p�0.001) and the probability <strong>of</strong> retrieved lymph nodes less than 15 was<br />

more in non-specialized group (25.9% vs. 7.3%, p�0.001). Postoperative<br />

mortality was also higher in non-specialized group than in specialized<br />

group(1.5% vs. 0.9%, p�0.001). Conclusions: In high volume general<br />

hospital, sub-specialty training is desirable in gastric cancer surgery, the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> gastric cancer surgery can be further improved by sub-specialty<br />

training leading to better treatment outcome.<br />

4094 General Poster Session (Board #47E), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Multicenter phase II study combining panitumumab with chemoradiation<br />

followed by surgery for patients with operable esophageal cancer (PACTstudy).<br />

Presenting Author: Sil Kordes, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam,<br />

Netherlands<br />

Background: A consistent finding in many studies in patients with operable<br />

esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer is that response to<br />

preoperative therapy, particularly the absence <strong>of</strong> residual disease in the<br />

surgical specimen, is an indicator <strong>of</strong> better disease-free and overall<br />

survival. One <strong>of</strong> the potential strategies to improve these local effects <strong>of</strong><br />

preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is the concurrent inhibition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Therefore in our trial we evaluated<br />

the pathologic response <strong>of</strong> panitumumab in combination with neoadjuvant<br />

CRT as first line treatment <strong>of</strong> operable adenocarcinomas or squamous<br />

cell carcinomas <strong>of</strong> the esophagus. Methods: Patients with resectable<br />

cT1N1M0 or cT2-3N0-2M0 tumors received preoperative CRT consisting<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3 administrations <strong>of</strong> panitumumab (6mg/kg) in weeks 1-3-5, weekly<br />

administrations <strong>of</strong> carboplatin (AUC � 2) and paclitaxel (50 mg·m2 ) for 5<br />

weeks and concurrent radiotherapy (41.4 Gy in 23 fractions, 5 days per<br />

week) followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

pathologic complete responses (pCR). Results: From January 2010 till<br />

December 2011, 91 patients were enrolled. 3 patients were not resected<br />

due to the development <strong>of</strong> metastatic disease during CRT. Results <strong>of</strong> all<br />

patients will be presented at ASCO. The majority <strong>of</strong> the 74 patients<br />

operated thus far had T3 (85%) and node positive (77%) tumors. 21.6%<br />

reached pCR and 13.5% had less than 10% viable tumor cells in the<br />

resected specimen. R0-resection was achieved in 98.6%. There were 58<br />

patients with adenocarcinoma and 11 patients with squamous cell carcinoma.<br />

The pCR <strong>of</strong> these patients were 15.5% and 45.5%, respectively.<br />

Main grade 3 toxicities were esophagitis, fatigue, rash and anorexia. 1<br />

postoperative death occurred due to ischemia <strong>of</strong> the esophageal reconstruction.<br />

Conclusions: The addition <strong>of</strong> panitumumab to chemoradiotherapy with<br />

carboplatin and paclitaxel was feasible without increasing postoperative<br />

mortality, but did not improve the rate <strong>of</strong> pathologic complete responses<br />

compared to historical data.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!