24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8528 Poster Discussion Session (Board #17), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Association <strong>of</strong> high T-cell immune infiltrate and low hemorrhage in<br />

melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) with prolonged survival. Presenting<br />

Author: Michal Tadeusz Krauze, University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh Melanoma Program,<br />

UPCI, Pittsburgh, PA<br />

Background: Despite the poor prognosis <strong>of</strong> patients (pts) with MBM several<br />

pts have prolonged survival. We hypothesized that the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong><br />

BrMM is determined by differences in melanoma biology and its brain<br />

microenvironment. Methods: We identified pts who have undergone craniotomy<br />

for MBMs. Evaluation entailed complete clinical information, acquisition<br />

<strong>of</strong> archived melanoma brain metastases, histopathologic analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections (n�101), whole genome expression<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iling (WGEP, Illumina DASL) in 29 archived tissues. Results were<br />

validated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH).<br />

Results: In univariate analysis (log-rank) factors significantly associated<br />

with prolonged survival were high immune infiltrate (HII) plus low hemorrhage<br />

(hazard ratio, HR, 2.71, p�0.001), present melanin (1.67, p�0.03),<br />

and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class 1 (0.37, p�0.0001). No<br />

association between HII and use <strong>of</strong> immunotherapy prior to craniotomy was<br />

noted. Only RPA class 1 (p�0.029) and HII plus low hemorrhage<br />

(p�0.002) remained significant in Cox proportional hazards model analysis.<br />

Gene set analysis <strong>of</strong> WGEP data confirmed that Encarta pathways<br />

related with T-cell activation and differentiation were significantly associated<br />

with prolonged survival whereas Y branching <strong>of</strong> actin filaments,<br />

presenilin action in Notch and Wnt signaling, G-protein signaling through<br />

tubby protein, lissencephaly gene in neuronal migration and development<br />

are among the gene categories associated with worse survival. IHC and ISH<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> tumor sections for various markers (n�40) showed that high<br />

peritumoral CD3� (3.31, p�0.009), high peritumoral CD4� (4.41,<br />

p�0.014), and high peritumoral CD8� (3.02, p�0.030) are associated<br />

with prolonged survival whereas neither CD14� nor FoxP3� infiltrate, nor<br />

high melanoma expression <strong>of</strong> antigen presentation molecules are associated<br />

with survival. Conclusions: Our study is the first to document that high<br />

peritumoral T-cell infiltrates are associated with prolonged survival. High<br />

tumor hemorrhage, an adverse prognostic sign, reflects aggressive melanoma<br />

cells that migrate and invade in the brain.<br />

8530 Poster Discussion Session (Board #19), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> activity and safety <strong>of</strong> combination therapy with temsirolimus and<br />

bevacizumab for advanced melanoma: Phase II trial with correlative<br />

studies. Presenting Author: Craig L. Slingluff, University <strong>of</strong> Virginia,<br />

Charlottesville, VA<br />

Background: A CTEP-sponsored phase II trial was performed to evaluate<br />

safety and clinical activity <strong>of</strong> combination therapy with CCI-779 (temsirolimus)<br />

and bevacizumab in patients with advanced melanoma. Correlative<br />

studies assessed mTOR signaling in tumor biopsies and evidence <strong>of</strong><br />

induced immunologic dysfunction systemically. Methods: 17 patients with<br />

stage III or IV melanoma were enrolled and treated with temsirolimus (25<br />

mg IV weekly) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg IV every 14d, starting d.8) for<br />

up to 13 months. <strong>Clinical</strong> response was determined by RECIST criteria.<br />

Adverse events were assessed (CTCAE v3.0). Blood was collected d.1, 2,<br />

and 23 (to assess immune function), and tumor biopsies were obtained (to<br />

assess protein kinase activity and melanoma cell proliferation). Results:<br />

Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 5 and 1 patients,<br />

respectively; 1 patient developed reversible leukoencephalopathy. In 16<br />

patients evaluable for clinical response, best overall response was a partial<br />

response (PR) in 3 patients (19%), stable disease at 8 weeks (SD) in 9<br />

patients (56%), and progressive disease in 4 patients. Thus, disease<br />

control rate (DCR � PR � SD) was 75%. Ten <strong>of</strong> the patients had BRAF<br />

wild-type (BRAFwt ) melanomas: these accounted for the 3 PRs (30%), and<br />

a DCR <strong>of</strong> 100%. Maximal response duration has exceeded 3 years for a<br />

BRAFwt patient. mTOR signaling was inhibited in melanoma metastases,<br />

based on decreased phospho-S6 kinase after 24h temsirolimus. Ki67� melanoma cells in tumor biopsies decreased significantly by day 23 (p �<br />

0.007, F-test), most notably in clinical responders. There was no significant<br />

alteration <strong>of</strong> T cell and NK function with combination treatment, by<br />

ELIspot and cytotoxicity assays. Conclusions: Combination therapy with<br />

temsirolimus and bevacizumab is well-tolerated in patients with advanced<br />

melanoma and has intriguing clinical activity. The most notable responses<br />

were in patients with BRAFwt tumors, a population with no accepted<br />

effective targeted therapy. Decreases in Ki67� melanoma cells may be<br />

associated with clinical response. The lack <strong>of</strong> immunologic dysfunction<br />

supports future combination with immune therapies.<br />

Melanoma/Skin Cancers<br />

547s<br />

8529 Poster Discussion Session (Board #18), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

The NIBIT-M1 trial: Activity <strong>of</strong> ipilimumab plus fotemustine in patients<br />

with melanoma and brain metastases. Presenting Author: Michele Maio,<br />

Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital <strong>of</strong> Siena,<br />

Siena, Italy<br />

Background: Patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (MM) <strong>of</strong>ten develop<br />

treatment-resistant brain metastases (mets). Treatment includes fotemustine<br />

(FTM), which crosses the blood-brain barrier. Ipilimumab (ipi) has<br />

shown activity in pts with MM and asymptomatic brain mets (Heller et al.<br />

ASCO 2011; abs 8581). In the phase II NIBIT-M1 trial, MM pts with<br />

asymptomatic brain mets were eligible for treatment with ipi plus FTM.<br />

Here, data from this pt subset are reported. Methods: Eligible pts received<br />

induction therapy with ipi 10 mg/kg every 3 wks (Q3W) x4 and FTM 100<br />

mg/m2 weekly for 3 wks, followed by ipi Q12W from Week (W) 24 and FTM<br />

Q3W from W9. The primary objective was the immune-related (ir) disease<br />

control rate (irDCR: complete/partial response [CR/PR] or stable disease<br />

[SD] using the ir response criteria). Secondary objectives included ir<br />

objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS); overall<br />

survival (OS), and safety. Tumor assessments were performed Q8W from<br />

W12 to W36 and Q12W thereafter. Results: Among 86 enrolled pts, 20 had<br />

brain mets. Of these, 7 had prior whole brain radiotherapy (n�4) or<br />

radiosurgery (n�3). As <strong>of</strong> December 2011, the irDCR was 50% (10/20;<br />

95% CI, 27.2–72.8%) with an irORR <strong>of</strong> 40% (95% CI, 19.1–63.9%: 2<br />

CRs and 6 PRs). Pts with irDC also had stability/reduction (n�5) or<br />

disappearance (n�5) <strong>of</strong> brain mets. Among pts with progressive disease, all<br />

but one had progression in the brain. With median follow-up <strong>of</strong> 8.3 months<br />

(range: 0.4–16.9), median irPFS was 4.6 months (95% CI, 0.7–12.3).<br />

The 1-year OS rate was 52.9% (95% CI, 26.6–79.2); median OS was not<br />

reached. Induction with ipi and FTM was completed by 55% and 85% pts,<br />

respectively. Grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 60%<br />

pts; most commonly myelotoxicity (50%), increased ALT/AST (5%) and<br />

gastrointestinal (5%). AEs were generally manageable and reversible per<br />

protocol guidance. CNS AEs <strong>of</strong> any grade (i.e., haemorrhage, headache and<br />

seizure) occurred in 25% pts (grade 3/4 in 2 pts) and were attributed to<br />

disease progression. Conclusions: The combination <strong>of</strong> ipi plus FTM is active<br />

and safe in pts with MM and brain mets, regardless <strong>of</strong> prior treatment, and<br />

will be further explored in the phase III NIBIT-M2 trial.<br />

8531 Poster Discussion Session (Board #20), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Activity <strong>of</strong> cabozantinib (XL184) in metastatic melanoma: Results from a<br />

phase II randomized discontinuation trial (RDT). Presenting Author:<br />

Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ<br />

Background: MET and VEGF signaling are implicated in angiogenesis,<br />

invasion, and metastasis. Cabozantinib (cabo) is an oral, potent inhibitor <strong>of</strong><br />

MET and VEGFR2. A RDT evaluated activity and safety in 9 tumor types.<br />

Here we report on the metastatic melanoma cohort, including the ocular<br />

subtype. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) were required to have progressive<br />

measurable disease per RECIST. Pts received cabo at 100 mg qd over a 12<br />

wk Lead-in stage. Tumor response (mRECIST) was assessed q6 wks.<br />

Treatment � wk 12 was based on response: pts with PR continued<br />

open-label cabo, pts with SD were randomized to cabo vs placebo, and pts<br />

with PD discontinued. Primary endpoint in the randomized phase was<br />

progression free survival (PFS). Results: Enrollment to this cohort is<br />

complete (n � 77); all pts are unblinded. Baseline characteristics: median<br />

age 66 years; melanoma subtype: cutaneous/mucosal 70% and ocular<br />

30%; known BRAF mutation 32%; LDH � 1.1 x upper limit normal 35%;<br />

bone metastases 19%; median prior lines <strong>of</strong> therapy 1 (range 0-5). Median<br />

follow-up was 2.8 months (range 0.3 - 25). 35 pts (45%) completed the<br />

open-label Lead-in stage with 25 pts randomized to continue cabo (n�12)<br />

or to placebo (n�13). Median PFS from randomization was 5.7 months for<br />

cabo vs. 3 months for placebo (HR�0.3, p �0.055). Median PFS from<br />

Study Day 1 was 4.4 months. The estimate <strong>of</strong> PFS at month 6 (PFS6) is<br />

44%. Evidence <strong>of</strong> objective tumor regression was observed in 39/65 pts<br />

(60%) with � 1 post-baseline tumor assessment including 11/23 pts<br />

(48%) with ocular melanoma. Two bone scan evaluable pts demonstrated<br />

partial resolution <strong>of</strong> bone lesions at wk 6 accompanied by pain relief. Most<br />

common Grade 3/4 AEs were fatigue (14%), HTN (9%), constipation (4%),<br />

and diarrhea (3%); one related Grade 5 AE <strong>of</strong> diverticular perforation and<br />

peritonitis reported during Lead-in stage. Conclusions: Cabo demonstrates<br />

activity in metastatic melanoma pts, regardless <strong>of</strong> subtypes or BRAF<br />

mutation status, with improvement in PFS relative to placebo, and high<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> PFS6 and objective tumor regression. The safety pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> cabo was<br />

comparable to that <strong>of</strong> other VEGFR TKIs.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!