Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8528 Poster Discussion Session (Board #17), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />
4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />
Association <strong>of</strong> high T-cell immune infiltrate and low hemorrhage in<br />
melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) with prolonged survival. Presenting<br />
Author: Michal Tadeusz Krauze, University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh Melanoma Program,<br />
UPCI, Pittsburgh, PA<br />
Background: Despite the poor prognosis <strong>of</strong> patients (pts) with MBM several<br />
pts have prolonged survival. We hypothesized that the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong><br />
BrMM is determined by differences in melanoma biology and its brain<br />
microenvironment. Methods: We identified pts who have undergone craniotomy<br />
for MBMs. Evaluation entailed complete clinical information, acquisition<br />
<strong>of</strong> archived melanoma brain metastases, histopathologic analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections (n�101), whole genome expression<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>iling (WGEP, Illumina DASL) in 29 archived tissues. Results were<br />
validated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH).<br />
Results: In univariate analysis (log-rank) factors significantly associated<br />
with prolonged survival were high immune infiltrate (HII) plus low hemorrhage<br />
(hazard ratio, HR, 2.71, p�0.001), present melanin (1.67, p�0.03),<br />
and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class 1 (0.37, p�0.0001). No<br />
association between HII and use <strong>of</strong> immunotherapy prior to craniotomy was<br />
noted. Only RPA class 1 (p�0.029) and HII plus low hemorrhage<br />
(p�0.002) remained significant in Cox proportional hazards model analysis.<br />
Gene set analysis <strong>of</strong> WGEP data confirmed that Encarta pathways<br />
related with T-cell activation and differentiation were significantly associated<br />
with prolonged survival whereas Y branching <strong>of</strong> actin filaments,<br />
presenilin action in Notch and Wnt signaling, G-protein signaling through<br />
tubby protein, lissencephaly gene in neuronal migration and development<br />
are among the gene categories associated with worse survival. IHC and ISH<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> tumor sections for various markers (n�40) showed that high<br />
peritumoral CD3� (3.31, p�0.009), high peritumoral CD4� (4.41,<br />
p�0.014), and high peritumoral CD8� (3.02, p�0.030) are associated<br />
with prolonged survival whereas neither CD14� nor FoxP3� infiltrate, nor<br />
high melanoma expression <strong>of</strong> antigen presentation molecules are associated<br />
with survival. Conclusions: Our study is the first to document that high<br />
peritumoral T-cell infiltrates are associated with prolonged survival. High<br />
tumor hemorrhage, an adverse prognostic sign, reflects aggressive melanoma<br />
cells that migrate and invade in the brain.<br />
8530 Poster Discussion Session (Board #19), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />
4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />
<strong>Clinical</strong> activity and safety <strong>of</strong> combination therapy with temsirolimus and<br />
bevacizumab for advanced melanoma: Phase II trial with correlative<br />
studies. Presenting Author: Craig L. Slingluff, University <strong>of</strong> Virginia,<br />
Charlottesville, VA<br />
Background: A CTEP-sponsored phase II trial was performed to evaluate<br />
safety and clinical activity <strong>of</strong> combination therapy with CCI-779 (temsirolimus)<br />
and bevacizumab in patients with advanced melanoma. Correlative<br />
studies assessed mTOR signaling in tumor biopsies and evidence <strong>of</strong><br />
induced immunologic dysfunction systemically. Methods: 17 patients with<br />
stage III or IV melanoma were enrolled and treated with temsirolimus (25<br />
mg IV weekly) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg IV every 14d, starting d.8) for<br />
up to 13 months. <strong>Clinical</strong> response was determined by RECIST criteria.<br />
Adverse events were assessed (CTCAE v3.0). Blood was collected d.1, 2,<br />
and 23 (to assess immune function), and tumor biopsies were obtained (to<br />
assess protein kinase activity and melanoma cell proliferation). Results:<br />
Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 5 and 1 patients,<br />
respectively; 1 patient developed reversible leukoencephalopathy. In 16<br />
patients evaluable for clinical response, best overall response was a partial<br />
response (PR) in 3 patients (19%), stable disease at 8 weeks (SD) in 9<br />
patients (56%), and progressive disease in 4 patients. Thus, disease<br />
control rate (DCR � PR � SD) was 75%. Ten <strong>of</strong> the patients had BRAF<br />
wild-type (BRAFwt ) melanomas: these accounted for the 3 PRs (30%), and<br />
a DCR <strong>of</strong> 100%. Maximal response duration has exceeded 3 years for a<br />
BRAFwt patient. mTOR signaling was inhibited in melanoma metastases,<br />
based on decreased phospho-S6 kinase after 24h temsirolimus. Ki67� melanoma cells in tumor biopsies decreased significantly by day 23 (p �<br />
0.007, F-test), most notably in clinical responders. There was no significant<br />
alteration <strong>of</strong> T cell and NK function with combination treatment, by<br />
ELIspot and cytotoxicity assays. Conclusions: Combination therapy with<br />
temsirolimus and bevacizumab is well-tolerated in patients with advanced<br />
melanoma and has intriguing clinical activity. The most notable responses<br />
were in patients with BRAFwt tumors, a population with no accepted<br />
effective targeted therapy. Decreases in Ki67� melanoma cells may be<br />
associated with clinical response. The lack <strong>of</strong> immunologic dysfunction<br />
supports future combination with immune therapies.<br />
Melanoma/Skin Cancers<br />
547s<br />
8529 Poster Discussion Session (Board #18), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />
4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />
The NIBIT-M1 trial: Activity <strong>of</strong> ipilimumab plus fotemustine in patients<br />
with melanoma and brain metastases. Presenting Author: Michele Maio,<br />
Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital <strong>of</strong> Siena,<br />
Siena, Italy<br />
Background: Patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (MM) <strong>of</strong>ten develop<br />
treatment-resistant brain metastases (mets). Treatment includes fotemustine<br />
(FTM), which crosses the blood-brain barrier. Ipilimumab (ipi) has<br />
shown activity in pts with MM and asymptomatic brain mets (Heller et al.<br />
ASCO 2011; abs 8581). In the phase II NIBIT-M1 trial, MM pts with<br />
asymptomatic brain mets were eligible for treatment with ipi plus FTM.<br />
Here, data from this pt subset are reported. Methods: Eligible pts received<br />
induction therapy with ipi 10 mg/kg every 3 wks (Q3W) x4 and FTM 100<br />
mg/m2 weekly for 3 wks, followed by ipi Q12W from Week (W) 24 and FTM<br />
Q3W from W9. The primary objective was the immune-related (ir) disease<br />
control rate (irDCR: complete/partial response [CR/PR] or stable disease<br />
[SD] using the ir response criteria). Secondary objectives included ir<br />
objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS); overall<br />
survival (OS), and safety. Tumor assessments were performed Q8W from<br />
W12 to W36 and Q12W thereafter. Results: Among 86 enrolled pts, 20 had<br />
brain mets. Of these, 7 had prior whole brain radiotherapy (n�4) or<br />
radiosurgery (n�3). As <strong>of</strong> December 2011, the irDCR was 50% (10/20;<br />
95% CI, 27.2–72.8%) with an irORR <strong>of</strong> 40% (95% CI, 19.1–63.9%: 2<br />
CRs and 6 PRs). Pts with irDC also had stability/reduction (n�5) or<br />
disappearance (n�5) <strong>of</strong> brain mets. Among pts with progressive disease, all<br />
but one had progression in the brain. With median follow-up <strong>of</strong> 8.3 months<br />
(range: 0.4–16.9), median irPFS was 4.6 months (95% CI, 0.7–12.3).<br />
The 1-year OS rate was 52.9% (95% CI, 26.6–79.2); median OS was not<br />
reached. Induction with ipi and FTM was completed by 55% and 85% pts,<br />
respectively. Grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 60%<br />
pts; most commonly myelotoxicity (50%), increased ALT/AST (5%) and<br />
gastrointestinal (5%). AEs were generally manageable and reversible per<br />
protocol guidance. CNS AEs <strong>of</strong> any grade (i.e., haemorrhage, headache and<br />
seizure) occurred in 25% pts (grade 3/4 in 2 pts) and were attributed to<br />
disease progression. Conclusions: The combination <strong>of</strong> ipi plus FTM is active<br />
and safe in pts with MM and brain mets, regardless <strong>of</strong> prior treatment, and<br />
will be further explored in the phase III NIBIT-M2 trial.<br />
8531 Poster Discussion Session (Board #20), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />
4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />
Activity <strong>of</strong> cabozantinib (XL184) in metastatic melanoma: Results from a<br />
phase II randomized discontinuation trial (RDT). Presenting Author:<br />
Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ<br />
Background: MET and VEGF signaling are implicated in angiogenesis,<br />
invasion, and metastasis. Cabozantinib (cabo) is an oral, potent inhibitor <strong>of</strong><br />
MET and VEGFR2. A RDT evaluated activity and safety in 9 tumor types.<br />
Here we report on the metastatic melanoma cohort, including the ocular<br />
subtype. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) were required to have progressive<br />
measurable disease per RECIST. Pts received cabo at 100 mg qd over a 12<br />
wk Lead-in stage. Tumor response (mRECIST) was assessed q6 wks.<br />
Treatment � wk 12 was based on response: pts with PR continued<br />
open-label cabo, pts with SD were randomized to cabo vs placebo, and pts<br />
with PD discontinued. Primary endpoint in the randomized phase was<br />
progression free survival (PFS). Results: Enrollment to this cohort is<br />
complete (n � 77); all pts are unblinded. Baseline characteristics: median<br />
age 66 years; melanoma subtype: cutaneous/mucosal 70% and ocular<br />
30%; known BRAF mutation 32%; LDH � 1.1 x upper limit normal 35%;<br />
bone metastases 19%; median prior lines <strong>of</strong> therapy 1 (range 0-5). Median<br />
follow-up was 2.8 months (range 0.3 - 25). 35 pts (45%) completed the<br />
open-label Lead-in stage with 25 pts randomized to continue cabo (n�12)<br />
or to placebo (n�13). Median PFS from randomization was 5.7 months for<br />
cabo vs. 3 months for placebo (HR�0.3, p �0.055). Median PFS from<br />
Study Day 1 was 4.4 months. The estimate <strong>of</strong> PFS at month 6 (PFS6) is<br />
44%. Evidence <strong>of</strong> objective tumor regression was observed in 39/65 pts<br />
(60%) with � 1 post-baseline tumor assessment including 11/23 pts<br />
(48%) with ocular melanoma. Two bone scan evaluable pts demonstrated<br />
partial resolution <strong>of</strong> bone lesions at wk 6 accompanied by pain relief. Most<br />
common Grade 3/4 AEs were fatigue (14%), HTN (9%), constipation (4%),<br />
and diarrhea (3%); one related Grade 5 AE <strong>of</strong> diverticular perforation and<br />
peritonitis reported during Lead-in stage. Conclusions: Cabo demonstrates<br />
activity in metastatic melanoma pts, regardless <strong>of</strong> subtypes or BRAF<br />
mutation status, with improvement in PFS relative to placebo, and high<br />
rates <strong>of</strong> PFS6 and objective tumor regression. The safety pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> cabo was<br />
comparable to that <strong>of</strong> other VEGFR TKIs.<br />
Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.