24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7520 Poster Discussion Session (Board #10), Tue, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Overall survival (OS) results from OPTIMAL (CTONG0802), a phase III trial<br />

<strong>of</strong> erlotinib (E) versus carboplatin plus gemcitabine (GC) as first-line<br />

treatment for Chinese patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced<br />

non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Presenting Author: Caicun Zhou,<br />

Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine,<br />

Shanghai, China<br />

Background: The OPTIMAL study demonstrated significant superiority for E<br />

versus GC in terms <strong>of</strong> progression-free survival (PFS), objective response<br />

rate, tolerability and quality <strong>of</strong> life (QoL) in first-line advanced NSCLC<br />

patients with EGFR activating mutations (Act Mut�). Here we report OS<br />

data from OPTIMAL (<strong>Clinical</strong>Trials.gov NCT00874419). Methods: Chemotherapy-naive<br />

Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC and EGFR Act<br />

Mut�, ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2 and measurable disease were<br />

randomized to E (150 mg/day), or GC, and stratified by histology, smoking<br />

status and mutation type. OS at final data cut-<strong>of</strong>f (15 Nov 2011) was<br />

evaluated for the entire intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Subgroup analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> OS by gender, histology, smoking status, PS, presence <strong>of</strong> skin rash and<br />

type <strong>of</strong> mutation was performed. Details <strong>of</strong> second- or later-line therapy<br />

were also documented for each patient. Results: A total <strong>of</strong> 165 patients<br />

were randomized to treatment and 154 patients received at least one dose<br />

<strong>of</strong> study drug (ITT population; E, n�82; GC, n�72). A total <strong>of</strong> 7 patients<br />

are still responding to erlotinib in the E arm. Post-study therapy included<br />

chemotherapy (doublet, n�38, or mono, n�8), or experimental drugs in<br />

clinical trials (n�10) in the E arm, and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)<br />

therapy (n�49) or chemotherapy (n�7) in the GC arm. Post-study<br />

treatment was not received by 26 and 16 patients in the E and GC arms,<br />

respectively. A total <strong>of</strong> 84 deaths were reported (E, n�47; GC, n�37). OS<br />

did not differ significantly between the two treatment arms (HR�1.065,<br />

p�0.6849), and no significant difference in OS was observed in the<br />

different subgroups. Conclusions: The lack <strong>of</strong> a statistically significant<br />

difference in OS in the OPTIMAL study was possibly due to a high level <strong>of</strong><br />

cross-over to EGFR TKI therapy in the GC arm. However, the significant<br />

benefits reported with E in terms <strong>of</strong> PFS, QoL and tolerability in this study<br />

suggest that E should be considered as one <strong>of</strong> the standard first-line<br />

treatments for patients with advanced EGFR Act Mut� NSCLC.<br />

7522 Poster Discussion Session (Board #12), Tue, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

EGFR compound mutants and survival on erlotinib in non-small cell lung<br />

cancer (NSCLC) patients (p) in the EURTAC study. Presenting Author:<br />

Rafael Rosell, Catalan Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Pangaea<br />

Biotech, USP Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain<br />

Background: When EGFR compound mutants (exon 19 deletions or L858R<br />

plusT790M) are present at the time <strong>of</strong> clinical resistance to erlotinib,<br />

patients attain longer overall survival (OS) (Oxnard et al. CCR 2011). The<br />

H1975 cell line, harboring L858R plus T790M prior to treatment, is<br />

sensitive to gefitinib (Sordella et al. Science 2004; Faber et al. Cancer<br />

Discovery 2011), though the compound mutant may become dominant<br />

after multiple passages in vitro, leading to resistance (Pao et al. PLoS Med<br />

2005). Methods: The EURTAC trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00446225)<br />

randomized 174 p with EGFR exon 19 deletions or L858R mutations to<br />

receive erlotinib or chemotherapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.7<br />

months (m) vs 5.2 m, respectively (P�0.0001). No differences in OS were<br />

observed.123 p with remaining available pre-treatment tumor tissue were<br />

re-analyzed for the concomitant presence <strong>of</strong> the T790M mutation with an<br />

allelic discrimination Taqman assay in the presence <strong>of</strong> a PNA clamp<br />

designed to inhibit the amplification <strong>of</strong> the exon 20 wild-type (wt) allele.<br />

This assay is capable <strong>of</strong> detecting the T790M allele at a ratio <strong>of</strong> 1:5000 wt<br />

alleles. Results: The T790M mutation was detected in 21/64 (32.8%) p in<br />

the erlotinib arm and 26/59 (44.1%) in the chemotherapy arm. PFS was<br />

12.1 m for p with mutant T790M in the erlotinib arm, 8.8 m for p with wt<br />

T790M in the erlotinib arm, 6.3 m for p with mutant T790M in the<br />

chemotherapy arm, and 4.5 m for p with wt T790M in the chemotherapy<br />

arm (P�0.0001). OS was not reached for p with mutant T790M in the<br />

erlotinib arm, 16.1 m for p with wt T790M in the erlotinib arm, 22.6 m for<br />

p with mutant T790M in the chemotherapy arm, and 18.4 m for p with wt<br />

T790M in the chemotherapy arm (P�0.04). Conclusions: Our unexpected<br />

finding that p with EGFR compound mutants attain the maximum benefit<br />

from erlotinib suggests a need for more sensitive assays to detect EGFR<br />

compound mutants and for studies <strong>of</strong> inhibitors targeting the EGFR T790M<br />

mutation. Whole genome sequencing may provide greater understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

the genetic factors involved in the differences in OS.<br />

Lung Cancer—Non-small Cell Metastatic<br />

485s<br />

7521 Poster Discussion Session (Board #11), Tue, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Updated overall survival results <strong>of</strong> WJTOG 3405, a randomized phase III<br />

trial comparing gefitinib (G) with cisplatin plus docetaxel (CD) as the<br />

first-line treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring<br />

mutations <strong>of</strong> the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Presenting<br />

Author: Tetsuya Mitsudomi, Department <strong>of</strong> Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer<br />

Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan<br />

Background: WJTOG3405 met its primary endpoint <strong>of</strong> progression free<br />

survival (PFS) (9.2 months (mo.) for G vs. 6.3 mo. for CD, hazard ratio (HR)<br />

0.489, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.336-0.710). (Mitsudomi et al.,<br />

Lancet Oncol., 2010). However, the impact on overall survival (OS) was not<br />

clear then because <strong>of</strong> relatively short follow-up period. Methods: Overall<br />

survival (OS) was re-evaluated using updated data (data cut<strong>of</strong>f, 31 July,<br />

2011, median follow-up, 34 months) for 172 patients. Results: Eighty-two<br />

events had occurred (48%). Median survival time (MST) for G arm was 36<br />

mo. (95% CI: 26.3 -) which was not significantly different from 39 mo.<br />

(95% CI: 31.2 -) for CD arm (HR 1.185, 95% CI 0.767-1.829).<br />

Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model revealed that<br />

none <strong>of</strong> covariates (treatment arm, smoking status, sex, age, postoperative<br />

recurrence or IIIB/IV, and mutation type) significantly affected OS. In the G<br />

arm, MST <strong>of</strong> patients with exon 19 deletion (36 mo.) was comparable to<br />

that <strong>of</strong> patients with L858R (35 mo.). In the CD arm, 78 patients (91%)<br />

received EGFR-TKI as the 2nd or later line treatment, whereas in the G arm,<br />

52 patients (61%) received platinum doublet. Accordingly, 130 patients<br />

received both platinum doublet and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)<br />

and 34 patients received EGFR-TKI without platinum doublet in their<br />

whole courses <strong>of</strong> therapy. MST for the former and the latter group were 36<br />

months (95% CI: 31.2-45.7) and 45 months (95% CI: 25.6-), without<br />

significant difference. Conclusions: This update OS analysis revealed that G<br />

for advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation <strong>of</strong>fers distinct survival benefit <strong>of</strong><br />

3 years. There was no difference in OS whether the first-line treatment was<br />

G or CD, in accordance with the precedent studies. The reason why PFS<br />

difference was not translated into OS difference is probably due to high<br />

cross over rate to EGFR-TKI. However, it was noteworthy that 40% <strong>of</strong><br />

patients in the G arm could be managed without platinum doublet and yet<br />

had similar outcome.<br />

7523 Poster Discussion Session (Board #13), Tue, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors based on location <strong>of</strong> EGFR exon 20 insertion<br />

mutations within the tyrosine kinase domain <strong>of</strong> EGFR. Presenting Author:<br />

Daniel Botelho Costa, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard<br />

Medical School, Boston, MA<br />

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (M) define<br />

an important subgroup <strong>of</strong> non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Most<br />

patients whose tumors harbor exon 19 deletions or L858R EGFR M have<br />

responses to reversible ATP-mimetic EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors<br />

(TKIs), gefitinib and erlotinib. Exon 20 insertion M comprise ~5% <strong>of</strong> EGFR<br />

M, occur at the N-lobe <strong>of</strong> EGFR after its C-helix (AA M766), and nearly all<br />

NSCLCs with EGFR exon 20 insertion M display lack <strong>of</strong> responses to EGFR<br />

TKIs (Yasuda H. Lancet Oncol 2011). Methods: We have 1) compiled<br />

genotype-clinical outcomes <strong>of</strong> EGFR exon 20 insertion M NSCLCs to EGFR<br />

TKIs, 2) generated a comprehensive panel <strong>of</strong> exon 20 EGFR M constructs<br />

using site-directed mutagenesis and introduced them into Ba/F3 cells for in<br />

vitro analysis, and 3) compared NSCLC cell lines with EGFR M to a novel<br />

malignant pleural effusion-derived cell line. Results: The disease control<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> gefitinib or erlotinib was significantly higher in EGFR exon 20<br />

insertion M located within the C-helix (3/3,100%) when compared to M<br />

following the C-helix (1/14, 7%; p�0.00059). The NSCLC with EGFR-<br />

A763_Y764insFQEA (located within the C-helix <strong>of</strong> EGFR) achieved a<br />

partial response to erlotinib that lasted 18 months. Most other exon 20<br />

insertion M-positive NSCLCs did not respond (p�0.07). Eight representative<br />

exon 20 insertion M were studied (including EGFR-<br />

A763_Y764insFQEA, Y764_S765insHH, A767_V769dupASV,<br />

D770_N771insNPG, H773_V774insH). All, but A763_Y764insFQEA,<br />

were resistant to micromolar concentrations (C) <strong>of</strong> EGFR TKIs. Ba/F3 cells<br />

with EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA underwent apoptosis upon exposure to<br />

nanomolar C <strong>of</strong> erlotinib. A patient-derived cell line with EGFR-<br />

A763_Y764insFQEA had phosphorylated EGFR, ERK and AKT inhibited by<br />

nanomolar C <strong>of</strong> erlotinib. Conclusions: Not all EGFR exon 20 insertion<br />

mutations are resistant to EGFR TKIs, and in specific EGFR-<br />

A763_Y764insFQEA is an EGFR TKI-sensitive M. This finding has clinical<br />

implications for the care <strong>of</strong> the 10,000 cases <strong>of</strong> EGFR exon 20 insertion M<br />

NSCLC diagnosed yearly and points towards the need to define the<br />

molecular mechanisms that underlie differential responses to EGFR TKIs.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!