24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LBA3500^ Oral Abstract Session, Sun, 9:45 AM-12:45 PM<br />

Bevacizumab (Bev) with or without erlotinib as maintenance therapy,<br />

following induction first-line chemotherapy plus Bev, in patients with<br />

metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Efficacy and safety results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

international GERCOR DREAM phase III trial. Presenting Author: Christophe<br />

Tournigand, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France<br />

The full, final text <strong>of</strong> this abstract will be available at<br />

abstract.asco.org at 12:01 AM (EDT) on Sunday, June 3,<br />

2012, and in the <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong> online<br />

supplement to the June 20, 2012, issue <strong>of</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> Oncology. Onsite at the <strong>Meeting</strong>, this abstract will<br />

be printed in the Sunday edition <strong>of</strong> ASCO Daily News.<br />

3502 Oral Abstract Session, Sun, 9:45 AM-12:45 PM<br />

Phase III CORRECT trial <strong>of</strong> regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).<br />

Presenting Author: Eric Van Cutsem, Digestive Oncology Unit, Leuven Cancer<br />

Institute, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium<br />

Background: Regorafenib (REG) is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor. The CORRECT<br />

trial was conducted to evaluate REG in patients (pts) with mCRC who had<br />

progressed after all approved standard therapies. Methods: Enrollment criteria<br />

included documented mCRC and progression during or �3 months after last<br />

standard therapy. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive best supportive care plus<br />

either REG (160 mg od po, 3 wks on/1 wk <strong>of</strong>f) or placebo (PL). The primary<br />

endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progressionfree<br />

survival (PFS), overall response rate, disease control rate, safety and quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> life (QoL). Efficacy analyses across prespecified subgroups were evaluated<br />

using univariate Cox regression. Results: 760 pts were randomized (REG: 505;<br />

PL: 255). The OS primary endpoint was met at a preplanned interim analysis. OS<br />

and PFS were significantly improved in REG arm compared to PL arm: hazard<br />

ratio (HR) for OS 0.77 (95% CI 0.64-0.94, 1-sided p�0.0052), median OS 6.4<br />

vs 5.0 mos; HR for PFS 0.49 (95% CI 0.42-0.58, 1-sided p�0.000001),<br />

median PFS 1.9 vs 1.7 mos. Comparable OS and PFS benefits were observed in<br />

exploratory subgroup analyses by region, age, time from diagnosis <strong>of</strong> mCRC to<br />

randomization, prior lines <strong>of</strong> treatment, and KRAS status (shown in table). The<br />

most common grade 3� AEs related to REG were hand-foot skin reaction<br />

(16.6%), fatigue (9.6%), hypertension (7.2%), diarrhea (7.2%) and rash/<br />

desquamation (5.8%). QoL data will be presented. Conclusions: REG demonstrated<br />

statistically significant improvement in OS and PFS over PL, as well as<br />

comparable efficacy benefits across pt subgroups analyzed.<br />

OS PFS<br />

Subgroups N HR 95% CI HR 95% CI<br />

Region*<br />

North America, Western EU, 632 0.77 0.62-0.95 0.50 0.42-0.60<br />

Israel and Australia<br />

Asia 104 0.79 0.43-1.46 0.43 0.28-0.68<br />

Age<br />

< 65 yrs 475 0.72 0.56-0.91 0.42 0.34-0.51<br />

> 65 yrs 285 0.86 0.61-1.19 0.65 0.50-0.86<br />

Time from Dx <strong>of</strong> mCRC to randomization<br />

< 18 mo 140 0.82 0.53-1.25 0.58 0.41-0.84<br />

> 18 mo 620 0.76 0.61-0.95 0.48 0.40-0.58<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> prior treatment lines on or after metastatic disease<br />

< 3 395 0.79 0.60-1.04 0.53 0.43-0.67<br />

> 3 365 0.75 0.56-0.99 0.47 0.37-0.59<br />

KRAS ^<br />

WT 299 0.65 0.48-0.90 0.48 0.36-0.62<br />

MUT 430 0.87 0.67-1.12 0.53 0.43-0.65<br />

* 24 pts from other regions not shown. ^ Historical record.<br />

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer<br />

203s<br />

LBA3501 Oral Abstract Session, Sun, 9:45 AM-12:45 PM<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> the X-PECT study: A phase III randomized double-blind<br />

placebo-controlled study <strong>of</strong> perifosine plus capecitabine (P-CAP) versus<br />

placebo plus capecitabine (CAP) in patients (pts) with refractory metastatic<br />

colorectal cancer (mCRC). Presenting Author: Johanna C. Bendell, SCRI/<br />

Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN<br />

The full, final text <strong>of</strong> this abstract will be available at<br />

abstract.asco.org at 12:01 AM (EDT) on Sunday, June 3,<br />

2012, and in the <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong> online<br />

supplement to the June 20, 2012, issue <strong>of</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> Oncology. Onsite at the <strong>Meeting</strong>, this abstract will<br />

be printed in the Sunday edition <strong>of</strong> ASCO Daily News.<br />

CRA3503 Oral Abstract Session, Sun, 9:45 AM-12:45 PM<br />

Bevacizumab (BEV) plus chemotherapy (CT) continued beyond first progression<br />

in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously<br />

treated with BEV plus CT: Results <strong>of</strong> a randomized phase III intergroup<br />

study (TML study). Presenting Author: Dirk Arnold, Hubertus Wald Tumor<br />

Center, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany<br />

The full, final text <strong>of</strong> this abstract will be available at<br />

abstract.asco.org at 12:01 AM (EDT) on Sunday, June 3,<br />

2012, and in the <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong> online<br />

supplement to the June 20, 2012, issue <strong>of</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> Oncology. Onsite at the <strong>Meeting</strong>, this abstract will<br />

be printed in the Sunday edition <strong>of</strong> ASCO Daily News.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!