Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2090^ General Poster Session (Board #18E), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />
The addition <strong>of</strong> bevacizumab to temozolomide and radiation therapy<br />
followed by bevacizumab, temozolomide, and oral topotecan for newly<br />
diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Presenting Author: Henry S.<br />
Friedman, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC<br />
Background: The prognosis for newly-diagnosed GBM is dismal. The<br />
addition <strong>of</strong> temozolomide to radiation therapy improved the median overall<br />
survival (OS) to 14.6 months (mos). GBM’s have the highest levels <strong>of</strong><br />
vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Hypoxia inducing factor-1 alpha<br />
(HIF-1 alpha) is an important regulator <strong>of</strong> VEGF, and topotecan may inhibit<br />
HIF-1 alpha. Methods: We performed a phase II trial in newly diagnosed<br />
GBM by adding bevacizumab and topotecan to standard therapy. 80 newly<br />
diagnosed GBM patients were enrolled between January 2010 and January<br />
2011. Patients received standard radiation therapy and temozolomide.<br />
Bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg every 14 days was added a minimum <strong>of</strong> 4 weeks<br />
post-op. Two weeks after radiation therapy was completed, 12 monthly<br />
cycles <strong>of</strong> temozolomide at 150 mg/m2 /d days 1-5, oral topotecan at 1.5<br />
mg/m2 for patients not on an enzyme inducing anti-epileptic drug (EIAED)<br />
and 2.0 mg/m2 for patients on an EIAED days 2-6, and bevacizumab at 10<br />
mg/kg on days 1 and 15. Results: The addition <strong>of</strong> bevacizumab to standard<br />
radiation therapy and daily temozolomide was safe. Of the 80 patients, 76<br />
completed radiation therapy. Four patients did not complete radiation, two<br />
with clinical decline, one each with a bone flap infection, and a pulmonary<br />
embolus. Fifteen patients came <strong>of</strong>f study for toxicity, five with recurrent<br />
grade IV thrombocytopenia, three with grade III fatigue, two each with<br />
grade 2 CNS hemorrhage, and wound dehiscence requiring surgery and one<br />
each with GI perforation, pulmonary embolism and an aortic thrombus. Of<br />
the 80 patients, 56 have progressed and 37 have died. The median<br />
progression-free survival (PFS) and OS are 11.1 mos (95% CI: 9.4-13.6)<br />
and 17.2 mos (95% CI: 15.2) at a median follow-up <strong>of</strong> 18.4 months. The<br />
two year OS is 45.3%. Conclusions: The addition <strong>of</strong> bevacizumab to<br />
temozolomide and radiation followed by temozolomide, bevacizumab and<br />
oral topotecan is tolerable. The median PFS and OS are encouraging. The<br />
randomized phase III trials with bevacizumab for newly diagnosed GBM<br />
patients are essential.<br />
2092 General Poster Session (Board #18G), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />
Primary central nervous system lymphoma: The Cleveland Clinic experience.<br />
Presenting Author: Manmeet Singh Ahluwalia, Cleveland Clinic,<br />
Cleveland, OH<br />
Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an<br />
uncommon variant <strong>of</strong> extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma that involves the<br />
brain, leptomeninges, eyes, or spinal cord without evidence <strong>of</strong> systemic<br />
disease. Untreated PCNSL has a rapidly fatal course, with survival <strong>of</strong><br />
approximately 1.5 months from the time <strong>of</strong> diagnosis. In this study, we<br />
sought to describe the demographics, diagnoses, management, and outcomes<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients with PCNSL at a single institution. Methods: After<br />
obtaining IRB approval, the Cleveland Clinic Brain Tumor and Neuro-<br />
Oncology Center’s database was used to identify patients with histologically<br />
proven PCNSL at the Cleveland Clinic between 1986 and 2010. Data were<br />
subjected univariate and multivariate analysis followed by recursive partitioning<br />
analysis in order to generate a prognostic model. Results: 153<br />
patients were diagnosed with PCNSL with a median age <strong>of</strong> 61 and<br />
Karn<strong>of</strong>sky performance status (KPS) <strong>of</strong> 70. The progression-free survival<br />
(PFS) was 9.3 months; the overall survival (OS) was 27 months. The<br />
treatment regimen included methotrexate-based chemotherapy (MTX) or a<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> methotrexate-based chemotherapy and whole brain radiation<br />
therapy (WBRT). Patients treated with the MTX regimen had an OS <strong>of</strong><br />
65 months; those treated with the MTX � WBRT regimen had an OS <strong>of</strong> 74<br />
months. The Cox proportional hazards regression identified age and KPS as<br />
the only prognostic indicators to OS and PFS. Recursive partitioning<br />
analysis categorized the patients into three groups according to these<br />
prognostic factors. Patients with KPS � 70 had a favorable outcome<br />
compared to patients with KPS � 70. This held true especially for patients<br />
age 60 and younger, whose median OS was 100 months. Conclusions: The<br />
survival and prognostic indicators approximate those reported previously<br />
and provide independent validation for a simple yet powerful prognostic<br />
model that uses age and KPS to predict survival.<br />
PFS and OS <strong>of</strong> patients in different groups based on age and performance<br />
status.<br />
Outcome PFS (months) OS (months)<br />
All patients 9.3 27<br />
Group 1 17 100<br />
Group 2 18 41<br />
Group 3 2.3 6.0<br />
Group 1: age � 60 years and KPS � 70; group 2: age � 60 years and KPS � 70;<br />
group 3: KPS � 70 (p � 0.0001).<br />
Central Nervous System Tumors<br />
137s<br />
2091 General Poster Session (Board #18F), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> fractionated and single session radiosurgery for radiation<br />
resistant brain metastases. Presenting Author: Eric Karl Oermann, University<br />
<strong>of</strong> North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC<br />
Background: Melanoma and renal cell carcinoma are commonly called<br />
radiation resistant tumors due to the decreased response rate to traditional<br />
radiation (1.8-2 Gy /Fraction). Large brain metastases from radioresistant<br />
primaries are clinical challenges. This study examines the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
fractionation on the treatment <strong>of</strong> intracranial metastases from radiation<br />
resistant tumors. Methods: Patients with a primary diagnosis <strong>of</strong> melanoma<br />
or renal cell carcinoma and intracranial metastases who completed<br />
treatment at The University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina with frameless robotic<br />
radiosurgery between 2007-2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients<br />
were treated with either single or 3-5 fractions depending on volume. The<br />
study’s primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and local control (LC),<br />
and its secondary endpoint was patient steroid requirements. Outcomes<br />
data and pre-treatment variables were analyzed for significance using<br />
appropriate non-parametric tests. Results: 25 patients were included in the<br />
single fraction arm and 13 patients in the multi-fraction arm, and both had<br />
equivalent pre-treatment characteristics with the exception <strong>of</strong> tumor<br />
volume which was larger in the multi-fraction arm (p�0.01). At a median<br />
follow-up <strong>of</strong> 4.7 months (range, 1.8-11.6), the median OS for all patients<br />
was 6.2 months. One year survival was 35.1% and 5 patients (13%) had<br />
local failures at a median time to local failure <strong>of</strong> 5.5 months. Patients in the<br />
multi-fraction arm failed at a higher rate (10.5%) than patients in the<br />
single fraction arm (2.6%) (p�0.04), but there was no difference in OS<br />
(p�0.34). There was no difference between pre-treatment and posttreatment<br />
steroid requirements between the two arms (p�0.351).<br />
Conclusions: Fractionation is intended to facilitate radiosurgery in large<br />
tumors by limiting high doses <strong>of</strong> radiation to a large portion <strong>of</strong> normal brain.<br />
In our study <strong>of</strong> radioresistant intracranial metastases, large tumors receiving<br />
multi-fraction radiosurgery had decreased local control with no difference<br />
in toxicity or OS. These results suggest a need for either dose<br />
escalation, or combination therapy designed to reduce tumor size (resection<br />
or aspiration) in order to facilitate single fraction treatment.<br />
2093 General Poster Session (Board #18H), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />
Low-grade gliomas in older patients. Presenting Author: Adewale Alade<br />
Fawole, Fairview Hospital, Cleveland, OH<br />
Background: Low grade gliomas account for 10-20% <strong>of</strong> all primary brain<br />
tumors. The outcomes <strong>of</strong> older patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) are not<br />
well known. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, the Cleveland Clinic<br />
Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center’s database was used to identify<br />
older patients defined as those �55 years <strong>of</strong> age with histologically<br />
confirmed grade 2 glioma at the time <strong>of</strong> diagnosis. Multivariable analysis<br />
was conducted with use <strong>of</strong> a Cox proportional hazards model and a stepwise<br />
selection algorithm that used p�.10 as the criteria for entry and p�0.05 as<br />
retention in the model to identify independent predictors <strong>of</strong> survival.<br />
Results: Chart records <strong>of</strong> 61 patients diagnosed between 1991 and 2010<br />
were included for final analysis. In contrast to patients �55 years, older<br />
patients are more likely to be male (p�.06), have poorer performance<br />
status at presentation (p�.0001), more comorbid conditions (p�.0001),<br />
present with more neurologic symptoms (p�.0001), have a prior history <strong>of</strong><br />
cancer (p�.0001). They are more likely to have astrocytic histology<br />
(p�.008) and present with multifocal tumors more frequently (p�.001).<br />
Older patients received radiation (RT) upfront more frequently (p�.07) and<br />
undergo gross total resection less frequently (p�.003). Median Progression<br />
free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) was 1.9 and 4.3 years,<br />
respectively in these patients. On univariate analysis, patients with poor<br />
performance status have worse PFS (p�.01) and OS (p�.003). Patients<br />
with memory impairment have worse PFS (p�.009) and OS (p�.0001).<br />
Patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy had better OS (p�.01).<br />
Tumor related characteristics associated with poor survival included, �pure�<br />
or mixed astrocytoma histology (OS, p�.06), multifocal tumors (OS,<br />
p�.08), left-sided tumors (p�.07). In multivariable analysis, performance<br />
status was the only independent predictor <strong>of</strong> either PFS or OS. Conclusions:<br />
Older patients with low grade gliomas have less favorable outcomes as<br />
compared to younger patients. They have more comorbid conditions and<br />
symptoms at presentation. Use <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy in this patient group was<br />
associated with improved survival. Performance status was the only<br />
independent predictor <strong>of</strong> either PFS or OS.<br />
Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.