24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2090^ General Poster Session (Board #18E), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

The addition <strong>of</strong> bevacizumab to temozolomide and radiation therapy<br />

followed by bevacizumab, temozolomide, and oral topotecan for newly<br />

diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Presenting Author: Henry S.<br />

Friedman, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC<br />

Background: The prognosis for newly-diagnosed GBM is dismal. The<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> temozolomide to radiation therapy improved the median overall<br />

survival (OS) to 14.6 months (mos). GBM’s have the highest levels <strong>of</strong><br />

vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Hypoxia inducing factor-1 alpha<br />

(HIF-1 alpha) is an important regulator <strong>of</strong> VEGF, and topotecan may inhibit<br />

HIF-1 alpha. Methods: We performed a phase II trial in newly diagnosed<br />

GBM by adding bevacizumab and topotecan to standard therapy. 80 newly<br />

diagnosed GBM patients were enrolled between January 2010 and January<br />

2011. Patients received standard radiation therapy and temozolomide.<br />

Bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg every 14 days was added a minimum <strong>of</strong> 4 weeks<br />

post-op. Two weeks after radiation therapy was completed, 12 monthly<br />

cycles <strong>of</strong> temozolomide at 150 mg/m2 /d days 1-5, oral topotecan at 1.5<br />

mg/m2 for patients not on an enzyme inducing anti-epileptic drug (EIAED)<br />

and 2.0 mg/m2 for patients on an EIAED days 2-6, and bevacizumab at 10<br />

mg/kg on days 1 and 15. Results: The addition <strong>of</strong> bevacizumab to standard<br />

radiation therapy and daily temozolomide was safe. Of the 80 patients, 76<br />

completed radiation therapy. Four patients did not complete radiation, two<br />

with clinical decline, one each with a bone flap infection, and a pulmonary<br />

embolus. Fifteen patients came <strong>of</strong>f study for toxicity, five with recurrent<br />

grade IV thrombocytopenia, three with grade III fatigue, two each with<br />

grade 2 CNS hemorrhage, and wound dehiscence requiring surgery and one<br />

each with GI perforation, pulmonary embolism and an aortic thrombus. Of<br />

the 80 patients, 56 have progressed and 37 have died. The median<br />

progression-free survival (PFS) and OS are 11.1 mos (95% CI: 9.4-13.6)<br />

and 17.2 mos (95% CI: 15.2) at a median follow-up <strong>of</strong> 18.4 months. The<br />

two year OS is 45.3%. Conclusions: The addition <strong>of</strong> bevacizumab to<br />

temozolomide and radiation followed by temozolomide, bevacizumab and<br />

oral topotecan is tolerable. The median PFS and OS are encouraging. The<br />

randomized phase III trials with bevacizumab for newly diagnosed GBM<br />

patients are essential.<br />

2092 General Poster Session (Board #18G), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Primary central nervous system lymphoma: The Cleveland Clinic experience.<br />

Presenting Author: Manmeet Singh Ahluwalia, Cleveland Clinic,<br />

Cleveland, OH<br />

Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an<br />

uncommon variant <strong>of</strong> extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma that involves the<br />

brain, leptomeninges, eyes, or spinal cord without evidence <strong>of</strong> systemic<br />

disease. Untreated PCNSL has a rapidly fatal course, with survival <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 1.5 months from the time <strong>of</strong> diagnosis. In this study, we<br />

sought to describe the demographics, diagnoses, management, and outcomes<br />

<strong>of</strong> patients with PCNSL at a single institution. Methods: After<br />

obtaining IRB approval, the Cleveland Clinic Brain Tumor and Neuro-<br />

Oncology Center’s database was used to identify patients with histologically<br />

proven PCNSL at the Cleveland Clinic between 1986 and 2010. Data were<br />

subjected univariate and multivariate analysis followed by recursive partitioning<br />

analysis in order to generate a prognostic model. Results: 153<br />

patients were diagnosed with PCNSL with a median age <strong>of</strong> 61 and<br />

Karn<strong>of</strong>sky performance status (KPS) <strong>of</strong> 70. The progression-free survival<br />

(PFS) was 9.3 months; the overall survival (OS) was 27 months. The<br />

treatment regimen included methotrexate-based chemotherapy (MTX) or a<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> methotrexate-based chemotherapy and whole brain radiation<br />

therapy (WBRT). Patients treated with the MTX regimen had an OS <strong>of</strong><br />

65 months; those treated with the MTX � WBRT regimen had an OS <strong>of</strong> 74<br />

months. The Cox proportional hazards regression identified age and KPS as<br />

the only prognostic indicators to OS and PFS. Recursive partitioning<br />

analysis categorized the patients into three groups according to these<br />

prognostic factors. Patients with KPS � 70 had a favorable outcome<br />

compared to patients with KPS � 70. This held true especially for patients<br />

age 60 and younger, whose median OS was 100 months. Conclusions: The<br />

survival and prognostic indicators approximate those reported previously<br />

and provide independent validation for a simple yet powerful prognostic<br />

model that uses age and KPS to predict survival.<br />

PFS and OS <strong>of</strong> patients in different groups based on age and performance<br />

status.<br />

Outcome PFS (months) OS (months)<br />

All patients 9.3 27<br />

Group 1 17 100<br />

Group 2 18 41<br />

Group 3 2.3 6.0<br />

Group 1: age � 60 years and KPS � 70; group 2: age � 60 years and KPS � 70;<br />

group 3: KPS � 70 (p � 0.0001).<br />

Central Nervous System Tumors<br />

137s<br />

2091 General Poster Session (Board #18F), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> fractionated and single session radiosurgery for radiation<br />

resistant brain metastases. Presenting Author: Eric Karl Oermann, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC<br />

Background: Melanoma and renal cell carcinoma are commonly called<br />

radiation resistant tumors due to the decreased response rate to traditional<br />

radiation (1.8-2 Gy /Fraction). Large brain metastases from radioresistant<br />

primaries are clinical challenges. This study examines the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

fractionation on the treatment <strong>of</strong> intracranial metastases from radiation<br />

resistant tumors. Methods: Patients with a primary diagnosis <strong>of</strong> melanoma<br />

or renal cell carcinoma and intracranial metastases who completed<br />

treatment at The University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina with frameless robotic<br />

radiosurgery between 2007-2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients<br />

were treated with either single or 3-5 fractions depending on volume. The<br />

study’s primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and local control (LC),<br />

and its secondary endpoint was patient steroid requirements. Outcomes<br />

data and pre-treatment variables were analyzed for significance using<br />

appropriate non-parametric tests. Results: 25 patients were included in the<br />

single fraction arm and 13 patients in the multi-fraction arm, and both had<br />

equivalent pre-treatment characteristics with the exception <strong>of</strong> tumor<br />

volume which was larger in the multi-fraction arm (p�0.01). At a median<br />

follow-up <strong>of</strong> 4.7 months (range, 1.8-11.6), the median OS for all patients<br />

was 6.2 months. One year survival was 35.1% and 5 patients (13%) had<br />

local failures at a median time to local failure <strong>of</strong> 5.5 months. Patients in the<br />

multi-fraction arm failed at a higher rate (10.5%) than patients in the<br />

single fraction arm (2.6%) (p�0.04), but there was no difference in OS<br />

(p�0.34). There was no difference between pre-treatment and posttreatment<br />

steroid requirements between the two arms (p�0.351).<br />

Conclusions: Fractionation is intended to facilitate radiosurgery in large<br />

tumors by limiting high doses <strong>of</strong> radiation to a large portion <strong>of</strong> normal brain.<br />

In our study <strong>of</strong> radioresistant intracranial metastases, large tumors receiving<br />

multi-fraction radiosurgery had decreased local control with no difference<br />

in toxicity or OS. These results suggest a need for either dose<br />

escalation, or combination therapy designed to reduce tumor size (resection<br />

or aspiration) in order to facilitate single fraction treatment.<br />

2093 General Poster Session (Board #18H), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Low-grade gliomas in older patients. Presenting Author: Adewale Alade<br />

Fawole, Fairview Hospital, Cleveland, OH<br />

Background: Low grade gliomas account for 10-20% <strong>of</strong> all primary brain<br />

tumors. The outcomes <strong>of</strong> older patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) are not<br />

well known. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, the Cleveland Clinic<br />

Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center’s database was used to identify<br />

older patients defined as those �55 years <strong>of</strong> age with histologically<br />

confirmed grade 2 glioma at the time <strong>of</strong> diagnosis. Multivariable analysis<br />

was conducted with use <strong>of</strong> a Cox proportional hazards model and a stepwise<br />

selection algorithm that used p�.10 as the criteria for entry and p�0.05 as<br />

retention in the model to identify independent predictors <strong>of</strong> survival.<br />

Results: Chart records <strong>of</strong> 61 patients diagnosed between 1991 and 2010<br />

were included for final analysis. In contrast to patients �55 years, older<br />

patients are more likely to be male (p�.06), have poorer performance<br />

status at presentation (p�.0001), more comorbid conditions (p�.0001),<br />

present with more neurologic symptoms (p�.0001), have a prior history <strong>of</strong><br />

cancer (p�.0001). They are more likely to have astrocytic histology<br />

(p�.008) and present with multifocal tumors more frequently (p�.001).<br />

Older patients received radiation (RT) upfront more frequently (p�.07) and<br />

undergo gross total resection less frequently (p�.003). Median Progression<br />

free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) was 1.9 and 4.3 years,<br />

respectively in these patients. On univariate analysis, patients with poor<br />

performance status have worse PFS (p�.01) and OS (p�.003). Patients<br />

with memory impairment have worse PFS (p�.009) and OS (p�.0001).<br />

Patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy had better OS (p�.01).<br />

Tumor related characteristics associated with poor survival included, �pure�<br />

or mixed astrocytoma histology (OS, p�.06), multifocal tumors (OS,<br />

p�.08), left-sided tumors (p�.07). In multivariable analysis, performance<br />

status was the only independent predictor <strong>of</strong> either PFS or OS. Conclusions:<br />

Older patients with low grade gliomas have less favorable outcomes as<br />

compared to younger patients. They have more comorbid conditions and<br />

symptoms at presentation. Use <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy in this patient group was<br />

associated with improved survival. Performance status was the only<br />

independent predictor <strong>of</strong> either PFS or OS.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!