24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

644s Sarcoma<br />

10056 General Poster Session (Board #49A), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Prospective web-based collection <strong>of</strong> sarcoma cases diagnosed and treated<br />

in France: Experience <strong>of</strong> the NetSarc network <strong>of</strong> the French Sarcoma Tumor<br />

Boards. Presenting Author: Francoise Ducimetiere, Centre Léon Berard,<br />

Lyon, France<br />

Background: The management <strong>of</strong> sarcomas, as for all rare tumors, is<br />

hampered by the limited dissemination <strong>of</strong> medical knowledge. Management<br />

within a specialized multidisciplinary sarcoma tumor board (STB)<br />

improves compliance to clinical practice guidelines. Since 2010, a<br />

national network with a dedicated system for referral, gathering the 26<br />

regional STBs, is supported by the French NCI. Its objectives are to monitor<br />

the management <strong>of</strong> sarcomas and give equal access to expertise and<br />

innovative treatments to all patients with sarcoma. We report here the first<br />

experience <strong>of</strong> a web-based data collection from these STBs. Methods: The<br />

expected incidence <strong>of</strong> sarcoma in France is 6.1/105 /year, ie 4000 new<br />

cases per year. A website collecting all files discussed in the 26 STBs was<br />

generated from Jan 2010 (www.netsarc.org). The prospective collection <strong>of</strong><br />

clinical data, STB decision and patient follow-up was implemented in the<br />

national database (40 items). Results: 7472 patients were accrued during<br />

2 years, 6202 (83%) had sarcoma, 2860 (46%) were new cases,<br />

representing 36% <strong>of</strong> expected incident cases. The number <strong>of</strong> new cases<br />

discussed in STB increased between 2010 and 2011 (�38%). Patients<br />

were referred to the STB (2010-2011; % <strong>of</strong> cases) prior 1) to biopsy<br />

(9%-15%), 2) to first surgery (34%-39%), 3) to adjuvant treatment<br />

(35%-34%), after treatment (14%-8%) and at time <strong>of</strong> relapse (8%-4%).<br />

15% had a metastases at initial diagnosis. The R0�R1 resection rates for<br />

primary surgery were 55% vs 42% within vs outside the STB centers <strong>of</strong><br />

NetSarc. 8% <strong>of</strong> declared patients were proposed to inclusion into a clinical<br />

trial. Conclusions: This web-based tool enabled the description <strong>of</strong> the<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> the STB at the national level. <strong>Clinical</strong> practices improved<br />

between 2010 and 2011, but 64% <strong>of</strong> new cases <strong>of</strong> sarcoma were not<br />

discussed in the referent STB prior to surgery. The yearly follow-up <strong>of</strong> the<br />

database will help to monitor evolution <strong>of</strong> clinical practices.<br />

10058 General Poster Session (Board #49C), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with high-risk extremity and truncal<br />

sarcomas: A 10-year follow-up study. Presenting Author: Nicole J. Look Hong,<br />

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA<br />

Background: Patients with high-risk extremity and truncal s<strong>of</strong>t tissue sarcomas<br />

(STS) are at considerable risk for recurrence. A regimen <strong>of</strong> preoperative mesna,<br />

doxorubucin hydrochloride (Adriamycin), ifosfamide, and dacarbazine (MAID),<br />

interdigitated with radiotherapy (RT), followed by resection and postoperative<br />

chemotherapy with or without RT, has demonstrated high rates <strong>of</strong> local and<br />

distant control. The goal <strong>of</strong> this series is to study outcomes <strong>of</strong> our most recent<br />

cohort <strong>of</strong> patients treated on this regimen. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed<br />

records <strong>of</strong> 55 consecutive patients with STS <strong>of</strong> the extremity or superficial trunk<br />

who completed all phases <strong>of</strong> treatment at our institution from January 2000–<br />

July 2011. Clinicopathologic characteristics and patient outcomes were analyzed.<br />

Results: Fifty-five patients were analyzed and had a median age <strong>of</strong> 53 years<br />

(range 18-73). The median tumor size was 10.1cm (range 2.5-35.5 cm).<br />

Twenty-seven (49%) and 28 (51%) patients had grade 2 and 3 tumors,<br />

respectively. Margins were negative in 49 (89%) patients, and positive in 6<br />

(11%) patients. At a median follow-up <strong>of</strong> 43 months, there were 7 (13%)<br />

locoregional, and 17 (31%) distant recurrences. The local and distant 5-year<br />

recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 92% and 64%, respectively. The<br />

5-year overall (OS) and disease-specific survival rates were 86% and 89%,<br />

respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths or secondary myelodysplasias.<br />

There were no significant predictors <strong>of</strong> OS or RFS. Conclusions: Outcomes <strong>of</strong><br />

a contemporary cohort <strong>of</strong> patients with extremity and truncal STS treated with an<br />

intense regimen <strong>of</strong> neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery are consistent<br />

with previous reports from our institution and better than reports <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy<br />

alone.<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> interdigitated chemoradiotherapy with adjuvant/neoadjuvant<br />

chemotherapy.<br />

N 5-year OS 5-year distant RFS<br />

Current (2012) 1<br />

55 86 % 64%<br />

Gotzak et al. (2001) 2<br />

134 65% -<br />

DeLaney et al. (2003) 1<br />

48 87% 75%<br />

Sarcoma Meta-Analysis<br />

Collaboration (2007) 3<br />

1568 ~65% ~ 60%<br />

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 9514,<br />

Kraybill et al. (2010) 1<br />

64 71% 64%<br />

Mullen et al. (2011) 1<br />

48 84% 80%<br />

1 2 3<br />

MAID chemoradiotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy.<br />

10057 General Poster Session (Board #49B), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Advanced s<strong>of</strong>t-tissue sarcoma in patients over age 75: Patterns <strong>of</strong> care and<br />

survival. Presenting Author: Delphine Garbay Decoopman, Institut Bergonié,<br />

Bordeaux, France<br />

Background: There are no data regarding the management and the outcome<br />

<strong>of</strong> elderly patients (pts) diagnosed with advanced s<strong>of</strong>t-tissue sarcoma<br />

(STS). Methods: The charts <strong>of</strong> pts aged � 75 years and diagnosed with<br />

metastatic and/or unresectable STS between 1990 and 2011 at Memorial<br />

Sloan Kettering (New York) and Institut Bergonié (Bordeaux, France) were<br />

reviewed. Results: 189pts were included.Median age was 79 years (range<br />

75-93).160 pts (84.5%) had metastatic disease. The most frequent<br />

histological subtype was leiomyosarcoma (n�57, 30%). The median<br />

age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity score was 10 (range 5-17). 120 pts<br />

(63.5%) received systemic therapy whereas 69 pts (36.5%) were managed<br />

with best supportive care (BSC) only. Pts who received BSC only were more<br />

likely � 80 years old (58% versus 38%, p�0.01) and with performance<br />

status (PS) � 2 (35% versus 14%, p�0.01). Single agent and combination<br />

therapy were delivered in 87 (72.5%) and 33 (27.5%) cases respectively.<br />

67 pts (56%) received a 1st-line anthracycline-containing regimen. The<br />

median progression-free survival <strong>of</strong> pts treated with systemic therapy was 4<br />

months (95% CI: 2.5-5.5). 21 pts (17.5%) had to stop 1st line treatment<br />

because <strong>of</strong> toxicity. On multivariate analysis, age � 80 years, PS � 2, and<br />

single-agent therapy were significantly associated with poor PFS. 51 pts<br />

received one or more further lines <strong>of</strong> therapies. At the time <strong>of</strong> analysis, 170<br />

pts (90%) had died. 96% <strong>of</strong> deaths were related to the disease. The median<br />

OS for the entire cohort <strong>of</strong> pts was 9.6 months (95% CI: 7.3-12). The<br />

1-year and 2-year OS rates were 43% (95% CI: 36–50), and 22% (95% CI:<br />

16–28), respectively. The median OS <strong>of</strong> pts managed with systemic<br />

therapy and BSC were 12.5 months (95% CI: 8.4-16.6) and 5.1 months<br />

(95% CI: 3.7-6.5), respectively (p�0.02). However, on multivariate<br />

analysis, PS � 2 and age-adjusted Charlson score � 10 were the sole<br />

independent factors significantly associated with OS. Conclusions: A high<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> elderly pts with advanced STS were considered unfit for<br />

chemotherapy. The OS <strong>of</strong> STS pts � 75 years who were managed with<br />

systemic therapy seems similar to that <strong>of</strong> younger pts. Further efforts are<br />

needed to better define the optimal care for fit and unfit elderly pts with<br />

advanced STS.<br />

10059 General Poster Session (Board #49D), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Risk factors leading to grading changes within 300 low-grade s<strong>of</strong>t tissue<br />

sarcomas. Presenting Author: Tanja Koshrawipour, BG University Hospital<br />

Plastic Surgery, Bochum, Germany<br />

Background: S<strong>of</strong>t tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare, mesenchymal derived<br />

tumors. Based on malignancy, three grades are distinguished with G1<br />

equaling low grade, G2 intermediate grade and G3 high grade, respectively.<br />

Studies have shown that some G1 tumors which underwent complete<br />

surgical resection reoccurred as lesions with a grading shift from G1 to<br />

higher malignancy. This grading change is referred to as up grading.<br />

Patients with grading changes were thoroughly examined in our study. Our<br />

aim was to find possible risk factors for up gradings, such as age,<br />

localization <strong>of</strong> tumor and tumor type. Methods: This retrospective case<br />

control study evaluated 333 Patients, who, between 1996 to 2011 were<br />

treated for G1 STS at Bergmannsheil Bochum, university clinic. These<br />

patients received complete initial surgical resection. Among our 333<br />

patients, 9.9% (n�33) developed up gradings <strong>of</strong> their STS. These were<br />

then reviewed more closely in the aim <strong>of</strong> finding possible risk factors. We<br />

did not exclude any patients from our data or deliberately pick any grading<br />

changers and regard our collective as randomly sampled. The processed<br />

data includes age, gender, tumor type, tumor localization, occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

recidive and grading change. Results: Patients with up gradings were found<br />

to have a higher mean age <strong>of</strong> 4, 5 years than reference collective. The tumor<br />

type has a strong, statistically significant effect on grading change as<br />

patients with fibrosarcomas have a threefold risk <strong>of</strong> developing up gradings<br />

when compared to patients with other G1 STS. Conclusions: Our results<br />

indicate that age and tumor type play the key role in the development <strong>of</strong> up<br />

gradings in low malignant STS .Patients aged 60 and above diagnosed with<br />

fibrosarcomas are at a 3 times higher risk <strong>of</strong> developing a grading change as<br />

opposed to patients younger than 60 with other low grade STS than<br />

fibrosarcoma. We discussed the significance <strong>of</strong> these risk factors and<br />

argued whether, in addition to wide tumor resection, a short term<br />

postoperative radiotherapy should be applied for these patients to improve<br />

therapeutical outcome.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!