24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

84s Breast Cancer—Triple-Negative/Cytotoxics/Local Therapy<br />

TPS1142 General Poster Session (Board #36C), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

NSABP B-47: A phase III trial <strong>of</strong> adjuvant therapy comparing chemotherapy<br />

alone (six cycles <strong>of</strong> docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide or four cycles<br />

<strong>of</strong> doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by weekly paclitaxel) to<br />

chemotherapy plus trastuzumab in women with node-positive or high-risk,<br />

node-negative, HER2-low invasive breast cancer. Presenting Author: Louis<br />

Fehrenbacher, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project and<br />

Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Vallejo, CA<br />

Background: Adjuvant studies utilizing trastuzumab in early HER2� breast<br />

cancer demonstrated a large reduction in recurrence and death. Postenrollment<br />

central testing showed HER2 non-amplified participants derived<br />

similar benefit. Methods: Selection <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the two chemotherapy<br />

regimens is by physician choice: The non-anthracycline regimen is TC<br />

(docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) administered IV<br />

every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; the anthracycline regimen is AC followed by WP<br />

(doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 administered<br />

IV either every 3 weeks or every 2 weeks [per investigator discretion] for 4<br />

cycles followed by paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV weekly for 12 doses). Patients<br />

are randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab<br />

therapy. For patients receiving the TC chemotherapy regimen,<br />

trastuzumab is given every 3 weeks during and following chemotherapy<br />

until 1 year after the first trastuzumab dose (8 mg/kg loading dose; 6 mg/kg<br />

for the remaining doses). For patients receiving the AC followed by WP<br />

chemotherapy regimen, trastuzumab begins with the first dose <strong>of</strong> weekly<br />

paclitaxel and will be given weekly for 12 doses (4 mg/kg loading dose; 2<br />

mg/kg for the remaining weekly doses). Following completion <strong>of</strong> WP,<br />

trastuzumab therapy continues with 6 mg/kg doses given every 3 weeks for<br />

a total <strong>of</strong> 1 year. Eligibility: Eligibility includes: node positive or high risk<br />

node negative female breast cancer patients; HER2 IHC 1� or 2� scores,<br />

but non amplified by FISH Statistical Design: The primary aim is to<br />

determine whether the addition <strong>of</strong> trastuzumab to chemotherapy improves<br />

invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). 3260 patients will be enrolled to<br />

provide statistical power <strong>of</strong> 0.9 to detect a 33% reduction in the hazard rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> IDFS using a one-sided alpha level <strong>of</strong> 0.025. Progress: Protocol was<br />

activated in January 2011. As <strong>of</strong> January 27, 2012, 486 <strong>of</strong> 3260 patients<br />

have been enrolled. Supported by NCI U10-12027, -37377, 69651,<br />

69974, and Genentech, Inc.<br />

TPS1144 General Poster Session (Board #36E), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

ARTemis: Randomized trial with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients<br />

with early breast cancer. Presenting Author: Helena Margaret Earl, Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Oncology, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical<br />

Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom<br />

Background: Bevacizumab is a new humanised monoclonal antibody which<br />

targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and thereby the neoangiogenic<br />

process in cancer. Bevacizumab has shown promising anti-tumour<br />

effect when given concurrently with taxane-based chemotherapy in breast<br />

cancer. However two neoadjuvant breast cancer trials have produced<br />

conflicting results. The NSABP-B40 study showed significant benefit for<br />

bevacizumab only in the ER�ve patients (pathological complete response<br />

(pCR) in ER�ve population 15.2% vs 23.3%, p�0.008). Whereas the<br />

GEPARQUINTO trial reported significant benefit only in the triple negative<br />

patients (pCR 27.8% vs 36.4% p�0.021). Methods: ARTemis is a phase<br />

III randomised trial to determine whether the addition to neo-adjuvant<br />

chemotherapy <strong>of</strong> bevacizumab is more effective than standard chemotherapy<br />

alone in patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer. A total <strong>of</strong><br />

400 patients will be randomised into each <strong>of</strong> the two treatment arms which<br />

will allow an absolute difference in the pCR rates in excess <strong>of</strong> 10% to be<br />

detected at the 5% (2-sided) level <strong>of</strong> significance with an 85% power.<br />

Primary outcome is pathological complete response rates after neoadjuvant<br />

chemotherapy, i.e. no residual invasive carcinoma in the breast,<br />

and no evidence <strong>of</strong> metastatic disease within the lymph nodes. Secondary<br />

outcomes are disease free survival, overall survival, complete pathological<br />

response rates in breast alone, radiological response after 3 and 6 cycles <strong>of</strong><br />

chemotherapy and rate <strong>of</strong> breast conservation and toxicities. Results:<br />

Recruitment into ARTemis began in April 2009 and as <strong>of</strong> January 2012<br />

had recruited 469 (59%). ARTemis is due to complete recruitment by Dec<br />

2012 and the first planned interim analysis <strong>of</strong> the primary outcome will be<br />

Dec 2013. Conclusion: The IDSMC reviewed the trial in June 2011 and<br />

recommended continuation <strong>of</strong> recruitment to this important trial given<br />

there were no safety concerns, and results from the other neoadjuvant<br />

studies (NSABP-B40 and GEPARQUINTO) are conflicting.<br />

TPS1143 General Poster Session (Board #36D), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

IBL2001: Phase (ph) I/II study <strong>of</strong> a novel dose-dense (dd) schedule <strong>of</strong><br />

indibulin for the treatment <strong>of</strong> metastastic breast cancer. Presenting Author:<br />

Tiffany A. Traina, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY<br />

Background: Indibulin (Zybulin, ZIO-301) is a new, synthetic agent that<br />

inhibits tumor cell growth at the G2/M phase through destabilization <strong>of</strong><br />

microtubule dynamics. It binds tubulin at a different site than taxanes and<br />

vinca alkaloids. Indibulin does not interact with acetylated (neuronal)<br />

tubulins and has not exhibited the neurotoxicity associated with other<br />

tubulin binders. Indibulin has potent antitumor activity in human cancer<br />

cell lines, including multidrug-, taxane-, and vinblastine-resistant lines.<br />

Norton-Simon modeling based on cell line data suggested that dd administration<br />

could optimize efficacy while limiting toxicity. Methods: Eligible are<br />

patients (pts) with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced breast<br />

cancer, measurable or non-measurable disease, and any number <strong>of</strong> prior<br />

therapies. The objective <strong>of</strong> the Ph I portion is to determine the maximum<br />

tolerated dose (MTD) <strong>of</strong> indibulin when given in a dd fashion (5 days<br />

treatment, 9 days rest (14 total) using standard 3�3 dose escalation<br />

schema. Ph II will seek to estimate the proportion <strong>of</strong> pts progression free at<br />

4 months when treated with indibulin at the dose determined in the Ph I.<br />

Secondary endpoints are overall response rate, proportion <strong>of</strong> subjects with<br />

stable disease �6 months and toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> indibulin. Optimal Simon<br />

two-stage design with an unpromising rate <strong>of</strong> pts who have not progressed<br />

at four months as 20% and a promising rate <strong>of</strong> 40% with a type I error <strong>of</strong><br />

5% and power <strong>of</strong> 80% will be used. 13 pts will initially enter the 1st stage <strong>of</strong><br />

the ph II portion. If there are 3 or fewer pts who do not experience disease<br />

progression at 4 months in the first stage <strong>of</strong> ph II, the study will be<br />

terminated and declared to have a negative result. If 4 or more pts do not<br />

progress at 4 months, enrollment in the ph II <strong>of</strong> the study will be extended<br />

to 43 pts. A total <strong>of</strong> 45 pts will be enrolled to allow for a 5% drop out rate to<br />

account for pts who may not be evaluable for the primary endpoint due to<br />

toxicity or study withdrawal rather than progression <strong>of</strong> disease or death prior<br />

to 4 months. If �13 out <strong>of</strong> 43 pts are progression-free at 4 months, the<br />

study will be considered to have a positive result and indibulin would be<br />

considered worthy <strong>of</strong> further testing in this disease.<br />

TPS1145 General Poster Session (Board #37A), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

A phase II, single-arm, feasibility study <strong>of</strong> dose-dense doxorubicin and<br />

cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by eribulin mesylate for the adjuvant<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> early-stage breast cancer (EBC). Presenting Author: Tiffany A.<br />

Traina, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY<br />

Background: Randomized trials have confirmed the benefit <strong>of</strong> the combination<br />

<strong>of</strong> an anthracycline (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) for the adjuvant<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> EBC. The addition <strong>of</strong> taxane therapy to AC therapy has further<br />

improved survival. Despite the improvement in adjuvant therapies for BC,<br />

new approaches for improving outcomes are <strong>of</strong> significant importance and<br />

may involve developing improved combination regimens. Eribulin mesylate<br />

has demonstrated antitumor activity and significant improvement in overall<br />

survival (OS) in patients with heavily pretreated locally advanced or<br />

metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and may improve outcomes in EBC as well.<br />

Methods: This study will determine the feasibility <strong>of</strong> eribulin as adjuvant<br />

therapy following dose-dense AC for HER2 normal EBC. A completion rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> �80% was set as a threshold for feasibility as established adjuvant<br />

regimens have shown feasibility rates ranging from ~65% for trastuzumab<br />

to �80%. This is a phase 2, single-center, feasibility study <strong>of</strong> dose-dense<br />

adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with EBC. Dose-dense AC (Doxorubicin<br />

60 mg/m2 IV plus C 600 mg/m2 IV) on day 1 <strong>of</strong> every 14-day cycle is given<br />

for 4 cycles, followed by 4 cycles <strong>of</strong> eribulin mesylate at 1.4 mg/m2 over<br />

2-5 minutes IV on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Growth factors are given on<br />

day 2 <strong>of</strong> AC cycles and only for neutropenia events with eribulin treatment.<br />

Feasibility is determined by the ability to complete the eribulin portion <strong>of</strong><br />

the regimen without a dose delay or reduction. Exploratory objectives<br />

include efficacy endpoints <strong>of</strong> 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and OS.<br />

Patients have histologically confirmed HER2 normal stage I-III invasive<br />

disease and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function. Thirty two <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 80 planned patients are currently enrolled. Feasibility rates<br />

will be calculated with growth factor support (ie, the successful use <strong>of</strong><br />

growth factor support following a neutropenia event is not considered a<br />

dose delay)and without growth factor support (ie, where need for growth<br />

factors is considered a delay). Secondary endpoints include DFS and OS<br />

and will be estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!