Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
110s Cancer Prevention/Epidemiology<br />
1600^ General Poster Session (Board #9B), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />
Correlation <strong>of</strong> high body mass index and circulating tumor cell positivity in<br />
patients with early-stage breast cancer. Presenting Author: Uta Ortmann,<br />
Heinrich Heine University , Duesseldorf, Germany<br />
Background: The prognostic relevance <strong>of</strong> both body mass index (BMI) and<br />
circulating tumor cells (CTC) has been confirmed in different trials for<br />
patients with early breast cancer. This analysis evaluates the correlation<br />
between high BMI and CTC positivity as risk factors for reduced disease free<br />
and overall survival. Methods: Data <strong>of</strong> 3658 patients <strong>of</strong> the SUCCESS A trial<br />
have been analyzed. CTC count and BMI were documented before (N �<br />
2026) and after (N � 1504) chemotherapy. Within this trial patients with<br />
early breast cancer were randomized to two chemotherapy regimens and<br />
received either 3 cycles <strong>of</strong> fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide<br />
followed by 3 cycles <strong>of</strong> docetaxel (FE100C-Doc) or 3 cycles <strong>of</strong> fluorouracil,<br />
epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by 3 cycles <strong>of</strong> docetaxel and<br />
gemcitabine(FE100C-DG). In addition, patients were randomized to zoledronic<br />
acid either for 2 or 5 years. CTC were analyzed using the CellSearch<br />
System (Veridex, USA). Different groups <strong>of</strong> bodyweight were classified<br />
according to the WHO’s international definition: Underweight (BMI � 18,5<br />
kg/m2 ), normal range (BMI � 18,5- � 25), overweight (BMI �25- � 30),<br />
obesity (BMI � 30). Correlation between CTC count and BMI was analyzed<br />
using frequency-table methods. Results: At study entry 24 (1.2%) patients<br />
were underweight, 952 (47%) patients were normal weight, 658 (32.5%)<br />
patients were overweight and 392 (19.4%) patients were obese. Before the<br />
start <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy, CTC were detected in 435 (21.5%) patients. We did<br />
not find a correlation between CTC positivity and BMI (p�0.94). After<br />
chemotherapy CTC were detected in 330 (16,3%) patients. Again, there<br />
was no statistically significant correlation between BMI and CTC positivity<br />
(p�0.86). In particular, CTC positivity was not observed more frequently in<br />
obese patients neither before (p�0.70) nor after chemotherapy (p�0.95)<br />
compared to patients with a BMI � 30 kg/m2 . Conclusions: As compared to<br />
patients with normal BMI, there was no significant difference in the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> CTC in underweight, overweight and obese patients, respectively,<br />
neither before nor after chemotherapy. The risk factors obesity and<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> CTC seem to be independent prognostic factors.<br />
1602 General Poster Session (Board #9D), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />
Correlation <strong>of</strong> BMI with tumor stage in early breast cancer patients (pts):<br />
Pooled analysis <strong>of</strong> the German SUCCESS A, B, and C trials. Presenting<br />
Author: Carola Anna Melcher, Department <strong>of</strong> Gynecology and Obstetric,<br />
Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany<br />
Background: Independent from known prognostic factors, e.g., tumor size<br />
and nodal status, obesity is a risk factor for poor disease free, distant<br />
disease free, and overall survival in breast cancer. The aim <strong>of</strong> this analysis<br />
was to examine the correlation <strong>of</strong> the body mass index (BMI) with tumor<br />
characteristics in early breast cancer. Methods: We analyzed the data <strong>of</strong><br />
7,997 pts with early, node positive or high risk node negative primary<br />
breast cancer treated with adjuvant taxan-based chemotherapy within the<br />
German multicenter phase III SUCCESS A, B, or C trials. The pts’ tumor<br />
stage at primary diagnosis was classified according to the UICC tumor-nodemetastasis<br />
(TNM) classification. Additionally, the tumor’s hormonereceptor<br />
status and HER2/neu status were determined. Before enrollment<br />
into the study each patient was grouped according to the WHO global<br />
database on BMI. Contingency table methods were used to analyze the<br />
correlation <strong>of</strong> BMI and tumor characteristics. Results: Among the 7,997 pts<br />
100 (1.3%) pts were underweight, 3,556 (44.5%) pts were normal weight,<br />
2,569 (32.1%) pts were overweight and 1,772 (22.2%) were obese. Of all<br />
pts 4,508 pts (56.4%) suffered from a pT2-4 tumor, 4830 (60.4%)<br />
showed lymph node involvement (pN1-3) and 7509 (93.9%) had G2-3<br />
tumors. 5839 pts (73.0%) showed positivity for ER or PR and 935 (11.7%)<br />
for HER2/neu. Overweight and obese pts had significantly larger tumors<br />
compared to pts with normal BMI (p�0.0001; p�0.0001). Furthermore,<br />
overweight and obesity were associated with a significantly higher rate <strong>of</strong><br />
lymph node involvement (p�0.0001; p�0.0003) respectively. In contrast<br />
neither grading, tumor histology, ER/PR-status nor HER2/neu-overexpression<br />
were correlated with BMI. Conclusions: These data are the first to show<br />
in a large number <strong>of</strong> pts that both obese and overweight women suffering<br />
from primary breast cancer have significantly larger tumors and more <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
positive axillary lymph nodes. As there are no differences in tumor biology,<br />
the advanced tumor stage might be due to more difficult and delayed<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> breast cancer and lymph node lesions in these women.<br />
1601 General Poster Session (Board #9C), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />
Evolution and landscape <strong>of</strong> clinical trials for breast cancer patients.<br />
Presenting Author: Semih Dogan, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France<br />
Background: Recent advances in cancer research are expected to have<br />
dramatically changed the way clinical trials are being done. In an effort to<br />
outline new trends <strong>of</strong> clinical research in the breast cancer area, we have<br />
evaluated the evolution <strong>of</strong> clinical trials started between 2006 and 2011.<br />
Methods: 622 clinical trials, started during the first semester 2006, the<br />
second semester 2008 and the first semester 2011, were analyzed. The<br />
data source was <strong>Clinical</strong>trials.gov. 30 items were included in the database.<br />
Results: The overall number <strong>of</strong> patients included in prospective clinical<br />
trials increased over these periods (n�67,820, n�91,429, n�98,417).<br />
However, when large epidemiological cohorts are excluded, a significant<br />
fall in the number <strong>of</strong> patients is seen (n�67,820, n�44,554, n�37,417).<br />
The absolute number <strong>of</strong> therapeutic trials also decreased during this time<br />
(n�93, n�99, n�78), mainly related to the dramatic fall in the number <strong>of</strong><br />
trials testing conventional treatments (n�40, n�24, n�20). In the<br />
meantime, the number <strong>of</strong> trials testing targeted agents remained similar<br />
(n�46, n�67, n�50). Interestingly, in the same time, the number <strong>of</strong> trials<br />
testing a targeted agent in a population defined by a biomarker increased<br />
(n�1, n�6, n�14). At the opposite, prospective studies aimed at<br />
validating biomarkers did not increase, and remained only driven by large<br />
consortiums. As illustration, when we exclude RxPONDER trial, the<br />
biomarker-validation studies opened in 2011 planned to include only 2<br />
493 patients, representing 2% <strong>of</strong> the breast cancer research field.<br />
Prospective trials testing social sciences and supportive care (n� 70,<br />
n�72, n�70) tend to become as important as therapeutic trials. Finally,<br />
large epidemiological cohorts opened in 2011 will represent more than<br />
60% <strong>of</strong> the patients included in clinical trials. Conclusions: The part <strong>of</strong><br />
cohorts and social sciences in breast cancer research is increasing and<br />
represents now the majority <strong>of</strong> the clinical research activity. When the<br />
analysis focuses on therapeutic trials, the breast cancer field recently<br />
shifted to targeted agents and early data suggest that therapeutic research<br />
is increasingly incorporating companion biomarker. Analysis on all 2,762<br />
clinical trials done between 2006 and 2011 will be presented.<br />
1603 General Poster Session (Board #9E), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> gender on age-specific effects for ulcerated malignant melanomas.<br />
Presenting Author: Blakely S. Richardson, University Hospitals Case<br />
Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine,<br />
Cleveland, OH<br />
Background: Gender, age at diagnosis, and ulceration are all independent<br />
prognostic factors for melanoma. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to further<br />
examine the interactions among gender, age, and melanoma ulceration.<br />
Methods: Using the NCI’s SEER 17 Registries Database (2004-2008), we<br />
assessed ulceration status among White men and women with malignant<br />
melanoma, stratified by younger (ages 10-39 years) and older (ages 40-84<br />
years) ages at diagnosis as well as by tumor depth. The analysis was<br />
restricted to melanomas common to both age groups, i.e. superficial<br />
spreading, nodular, and unclassified melanomas. There were 2905 older<br />
men, 301 younger men, 1624 older women and 276 younger women that<br />
fit our criteria. Relative risks were expressed as incidence rate ratios (IRR)<br />
with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: At every tumor depth, IRRs for<br />
ulcerated melanomas were significantly higher for older than younger<br />
persons (IRR�1.0). The trend, however, was different in men as compared<br />
to women. In men, the IRR (older to younger) rose continuously with<br />
increasing depth [�1.0mm: IRR 7.81 (CI 6.18-9.98), 1.01mm-�2.0mm:<br />
IRR 9.71 (CI 7.55-12.68), 2.01mm-�4.0mm: IRR 11.04 (CI 8.78-<br />
14.06); and �4.01mm: IRR 12.26 (CI 9.60-15.87)]. On the other hand,<br />
in women, IRR (older to younger) was stable for all depths �4.0mm then<br />
nearly doubled for melanomas �4.01mm [�4.01mm: IRR 8.00 (CI<br />
5.85-11.20)]. The IRR trend analysis was statistically significant for men<br />
(p � 0.01) but not for women (p � 0.34). Conclusions: Our study confirms<br />
that older age at diagnosis is associated with higher incidence rates <strong>of</strong><br />
ulcerated malignant melanomas. This large-scale population-based analysis<br />
also shows an effect modification by gender and tumor thickness,<br />
suggesting different biologic behavior in melanoma in younger and older<br />
men and women. Future studies should further investigate tumor biology<br />
differences in these populations and the interactions among gender, age at<br />
diagnosis, and ulceration in melanoma.<br />
Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.