24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

336s Gynecologic Cancer<br />

5038 General Poster Session (Board #17F), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Phase Ib study <strong>of</strong> AMG 386 in combination with paclitaxel (P) and carboplatin<br />

(C) in high-risk stage I and stages II-IV epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or<br />

fallopian tube cancers. Presenting Author: Antonio Casado, Hospital Clínico San<br />

Carlos, Madrid, Spain<br />

Background: AMG 386 is a first-in-class investigational peptibody that inhibits<br />

angiopoietin-1/-2 binding to Tie2. We report on an ongoing, 2-part, open-label<br />

phase 1b study <strong>of</strong> AMG 386 � PC as first-line treatment <strong>of</strong> high-risk ovarian<br />

cancer. Methods: <strong>Part</strong> 1 enrolled women, GOG performance status 0/1, with<br />

newly diagnosed, FIGO high-risk stage I or stages II, IIIA-B (primary debulking<br />

surgery; PDS) or IIIC & IV (PDS or interval debulking surgery; IDS) ovarian<br />

cancer. Patients (pts) received AMG 386 at 15 mg/kg QW IV � P at 175 mg/m2 Q3W � C at AUC 6 Q3W for 6 cycles (or until disease progression or<br />

unacceptable toxicity); AMG 386 was withheld 4 weeks pre-/post-debulking. Pts<br />

completing 6 cycles continued AMG 386 QW as maintenance for up to 18<br />

months. <strong>Part</strong> 1: incidence <strong>of</strong> dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) dictated expansion<br />

to 25 pts (part 2). Primary endpoint: DLT incidence; secondary: adverse events<br />

(AEs), PK and efficacy measures. Results: At the time <strong>of</strong> analysis, 16 pts had<br />

received �1 dose <strong>of</strong> AMG 386 � PC and completed �2 cycles <strong>of</strong> therapy (PDS,<br />

n�8; IDS, n�8). No DLTs occurred in part 1. 15 pts continue on-study; 6 pts<br />

have received a median <strong>of</strong> 6 doses <strong>of</strong> maintenance AMG 386. One pt<br />

discontinued due to progression. AEs are tabulated below. One serious AE<br />

(decreased appetite; maintenance phase) required hospitalization. AE incidence<br />

and type were similar for PDS or IDS. Combination therapy did not affect the PK<br />

<strong>of</strong> AMG 386 or PC. Non-neutralizing antibodies against AMG 386 were detected<br />

in 2 pts. Conclusions: AMG 386 at 15 mg/kg QW � PC is tolerable in pts with<br />

high-risk ovarian cancer. AMG 386 maintenance was tolerated and associated<br />

with few AEs. Updated toxicity and efficacy data will be presented.<br />

AEs<br />

Any; n (%)<br />

Of specific interest (grade 3<br />

Neutropenia<br />

Decreased appetite<br />

Localized edema<br />

Syncope<br />

Thrombocytopenia<br />

Anemia<br />

Ascites<br />

Hypertension<br />

Hypokalaemia<br />

Psoriasis<br />

All grade >4<br />

Neutropenia<br />

Thrombocytopenia<br />

Grade 5<br />

AMG 386 � PC<br />

n � 16<br />

16 (100)<br />

1(6)<br />

1(6)<br />

1(6)<br />

8 (50)<br />

5 (31)<br />

0<br />

0<br />

2 (13)<br />

2 (13)<br />

1(6)<br />

1(6)<br />

1(6)<br />

1(6)<br />

1(6)<br />

4 (25)<br />

3 (19)<br />

1(6)<br />

0<br />

AMG 386 maintenance<br />

n � 6<br />

4 (67)<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

2 (33)<br />

0<br />

1 (17)<br />

1 (17)<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

5040 General Poster Session (Board #17H), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

ESA use in women with cancer: Consequences <strong>of</strong> the 2008 FDA clinical<br />

alert. Presenting Author: Kimberly M. Dickinson, Warren Alpert Medical<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Brown University, Providence, RI<br />

Background: Erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA) are used clinically as<br />

an alternative to blood transfusions in cancer patients suffering from<br />

symptoms <strong>of</strong> anemia. However, more recent randomized controlled trials <strong>of</strong><br />

ESA usage concluded that its use is associated with an increased risk <strong>of</strong><br />

tumor progression and death. As a result, in July 2008 the FDA issued a<br />

clinical alert restricting the use <strong>of</strong> ESA. A reduction in the prescribing <strong>of</strong><br />

ESA was immediately seen but changes in blood transfusion rates have not<br />

been examined. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted<br />

drawing from patients under treatment in the Program in Women’s<br />

Oncology at Women and Infant’s Hospital from one year before the clinical<br />

alert (August 2007-July 2008) to one year afterward (August 2008-July<br />

2009). The primary outcomes were blood transfusion and ESA administration<br />

rates compared across the two time periods. Results: The study<br />

population (n�776) included patients with a cancer diagnosis who<br />

received chemotherapy during one or both time periods. 165 (21.3%)<br />

patients received ESA treatment. The total number <strong>of</strong> ESA treatments<br />

administered in the study period <strong>of</strong> interest was 1,277, with the majority<br />

(60%) given prior to the FDA alert. The mean number <strong>of</strong> ESA treatments in<br />

the first time period was 6.39 per person as compared to 0.61 per person in<br />

the second time period. Of the study population, 186 (23.8%) patients<br />

received at least one blood transfusion. A total <strong>of</strong> 463 blood transfusions<br />

were administered during the entire study period but a significant difference<br />

was not observed in the proportion <strong>of</strong> those delivered prior to the FDA<br />

alert (52%) versus after the FDA alert (48%). The average number <strong>of</strong><br />

transfusions given in the first time period was 2.34 per person, as<br />

compared to 2.17 per person in the second period. Conclusions: Our results<br />

indicate that despite a steep decline in the use <strong>of</strong> ESA for chemotherapyinduced<br />

anemia, blood transfusion rates were not significantly different<br />

between the two periods. Interestingly, a slight downward trend was<br />

observed from before the FDA alert to after the alert. While more work is<br />

needed to understand the implications <strong>of</strong> these findings, it suggests that<br />

resource utilization did not increase despite the reduction in ESA use.<br />

5039 General Poster Session (Board #17G), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

The combination <strong>of</strong> intravenous bevacizumab and metronomic oral cyclophosphamide<br />

for recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Presenting<br />

Author: Emma L. Barber, Northwestern University, Department <strong>of</strong> Gynecologic<br />

Oncology, Chicago, IL<br />

Background: This study was undertaken to determine the progression free<br />

survival and overall survival in heavily pre-treated patients with recurrent<br />

ovarian carcinoma treated with bevacizumab and metronomic oral cyclophosphamide.<br />

Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective review was performed<br />

for all patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube or primary<br />

peritoneal carcinomas treated with intravenous bevacizumab 10mg/kg<br />

every 14 days and oral cyclophosphamide 50mg daily between January<br />

2006 and December 2010. Response to treatment was determined by<br />

change in disease status according to RECIST criteria and/or CA-125<br />

levels. Results: Sixty-six eligible patients were identified with a median age<br />

<strong>of</strong> 58 years. Fifty-five patients (83%) originally had optimal cytoreduction<br />

and all were platinum resistant. Median time from diagnosis to beginning<br />

bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide was 36 months. Median number <strong>of</strong><br />

prior chemotherapy treatments was 7.5 (range 3-16). Eight patients<br />

(12.1%) had side effects which required discontinuing bevacizumab and<br />

cyclophosphamide, most common were hypertension, proteinuria, and<br />

fatigue. There was one bowel perforation (1.5%). A complete response was<br />

noted in 7 patients (10.6%), partial response was seen in 21 patients<br />

(31.8%) with an overall response rate <strong>of</strong> 42.4%. Fifteen patients (22.7%)<br />

had stable disease and 23 (34.8%) had disease progression. Median<br />

progression free survival (PFS) for responders was 5 months (range 2-14)<br />

and 11 months (range 4-14) for those with a complete response. Median<br />

overall survival (OS) from start <strong>of</strong> bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide for<br />

responders was 20 months (range 2-56) and 9 months (range 1-51) for<br />

nonresponders. Conclusions: Bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide is an<br />

effective, well-tolerated chemotherapy regimen in heavily pre-treated<br />

patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma which significantly improves PFS<br />

and OS in responders. Response rates were significantly better than the<br />

rates we have reported in this same group <strong>of</strong> patients receiving topotecan<br />

(22%) or liposomal doxorubicin (25%) and were superior to reported rates<br />

for single agent bevacizumab (18%) in patients with only 2-3 prior<br />

regimens.<br />

5041 General Poster Session (Board #18A), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Carboplatin dosing in the treatment <strong>of</strong> epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC): A<br />

Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study. Presenting Author: Roisin Eilish<br />

O’Cearbhaill, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY<br />

Background: Optimal carboplatin dosing (CPRx) for patients (pts) with renal<br />

dysfunction or low creatinine (Cr) values in the setting <strong>of</strong> malnutrition and<br />

ascites is unknown. Multiple methods have been utilized to estimate Cr<br />

clearance (CrCl) but these perform differently in pts with abnormal Cr<br />

values. We sought to determine 1) the relationship between adverse events<br />

(AE) and baseline CrCl used for CPRx; 2) the effect on CPRx <strong>of</strong> using<br />

Cockcr<strong>of</strong>t-Gault (CG) �/- the NCI/CTEP recommended limits (CGL), Modification<br />

<strong>of</strong> diet in renal disease (MDRD) or Jelliffe Formula (J) renal function<br />

estimates. Methods: Retrospective data were drawn from pts treated on<br />

GOG 182, a phase III trial <strong>of</strong> carboplatin doublet vs triplet or sequential<br />

doublet combinations in stage III/IV EOC. For patient safety, the protocol<br />

was amended to assign the lower limit <strong>of</strong> Cr at 0.6mg/dl for CPRx. Area<br />

under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to<br />

describe associations between CrClJ and various AE. Sensitivity and<br />

positive predictive values (PPV) described the AE rate in pts with CrClJ �60ml/min. CPRx for each pt was calculated using J, CG, CGL and MDRD.<br />

Results: 3830 evaluable pts had a mean age 58.7yrs, mean BMI 26.8kg/m2 and mean baseline CrClJ 81.9ml/min (range 23.4-239). The AUC statistics<br />

(range 0.52-0.64) show that the log(CrClJ) was not a good predictor <strong>of</strong><br />

grade �3 AE (anemia, thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, auditory,<br />

renal, metabolic, neurologic). A cut<strong>of</strong>f value <strong>of</strong> CrClJ �60 ml/min would<br />

have deemed 15% <strong>of</strong> pts treated on GOG182 ineligible. The range <strong>of</strong> PPV<br />

for the above AEs in pts with CrClJ �60 ml/min was 1.8-15%. Using CG,<br />

CGL, MDRD instead <strong>of</strong> J for CPRx would have resulted in �10% decrease<br />

in CPRx in 21%, 32% and 12% <strong>of</strong> pts, respectively. Using CG, CGL, MDRD<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> J for CPRx would have resulted in �10% increase in CPRx in<br />

45%, 9.6% and 5.2% <strong>of</strong> pts, respectively. Conclusions: Our data do not<br />

support excluding patients with CrClJ �60ml/min from clinical trials. The<br />

new GOG guidelines replacing J with CGL affect CPRx. The clinical<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> this change with regards to toxicity, particularly in pts with<br />

abnormally low Cr values, is yet to be determined.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!