24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3548 General Poster Session (Board #24C), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Plasma concentrations <strong>of</strong> YKL-40 in chemo-naive patients with metastatic<br />

colorectal cancer treated with FLOX with or without cetuximab: Results<br />

from the NORDIC VII study. Presenting Author: Line Schmidt Tarpgaard,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark<br />

Background: KRAS status is presently the best biomarker to select patients<br />

with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) for therapy with EGFR inhibition<br />

even though not confirmed in all phase III studies. In the NORDIC VII study<br />

a survival benefit <strong>of</strong> adding cetuximab to the Nordic FLOX regimen could<br />

not be confirmed. Identification <strong>of</strong> new predictive and prognostic biomarkers<br />

is essential. Plasma concentration <strong>of</strong> YKL-40 is emerging as a new<br />

biomarker in patients with cancer and inflammatory diseases. We tested<br />

the hypothesis that high plasma YKL-40 associates with short progression<br />

free survival (PFS) and short overall survival (OS) in patients included in the<br />

NORDIC VII Study. Methods: 566 patients with mCRC were randomized to:<br />

A) Nordic FLOX; B) FLOX � cetuximab; and C) FLOX for 16 weeks �<br />

cetuximab continuously. Plasma samples were available from 510 patients<br />

(90%). Pretreatment plasma YKL-40 was determined by ELISA (Quidel),<br />

and the plasma YKL-40 concentration was dichotomized according to the<br />

age-corrected 95% YKL-40 level in 3130 healthy subjects. Results: Plasma<br />

YKL-40 was elevated in 204 patients (40%) and the median plasma<br />

YKL-40 was higher in the study group compared to healthy subjects (120<br />

mg/l vs. 40 mg/l, p�0.001). Elevated plasma YKL-40 was associated with<br />

short PFS (HR�1.25, 95% CI 1.04-1.51, p�0.02). This relationship was<br />

demonstrated only in patients treated with FLOX chemotherapy alone<br />

(HR�1.42, 1.02-1.98, p�0.04). High plasma YKL-40 was associated<br />

with short OS in all patients (HR�1.55, 1.25-1.92, p�0.001) and in the<br />

different treatment groups (A: HR�1.54, 1.05-2.26, p�0.03; B:<br />

HR�1.40, 0.97-2.01, p�0.07; C: 1.79, 1.23-2.60, p�0.002). Multivariate<br />

analysis (YKL-40, performance status, number <strong>of</strong> metastatic sites)<br />

demonstrated that elevated plasma YKL-40 was an independent biomarker<br />

<strong>of</strong> short OS (HR�1.46, 1.17-1.81, p�0.001). Conclusions: Plasma<br />

YKL-40 may be a new prognostic biomarker in patients with mCRC treated<br />

with 1st line FLOX chemotherapy, with or without cetuximab. The predictive<br />

value <strong>of</strong> plasma YKL-40 is not yet clarified.<br />

3550 General Poster Session (Board #24E), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in stage II colon cancer (CC) in patients with<br />

Lynch syndrome. Presenting Author: Karsten Schulmann, Ruhr University<br />

Bochum, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Med. Dpt., Bochum, Germany<br />

Background: Previous studies showed conflicting results regarding the value<br />

<strong>of</strong> ACT in MSI-H CC. A recent study reported differential benefits from<br />

5-FU-based ACT comparing suspected sporadic vs suspected hereditary<br />

MSI-H CC. We sought to evaluate the prognostic impact <strong>of</strong> ACT in a large<br />

cohort <strong>of</strong> Lynch syndrome (LS) patients (pts) with stage II CC. Methods: To<br />

minimize selection bias diagnoses �2 years prior to registration in the<br />

database <strong>of</strong> the German HNPCC consortium were excluded. 278 patients<br />

(61% male, mean age 42.9y, 13% stage IIB, 51% with MMR gene<br />

mutation) were eligible. Overall Survival (OS), CC-specific Survival (CSS),<br />

and Disease Free Survival (DFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox<br />

Regression analyses. Results: 5y OS, CSS and DFS were 95%, 95% and<br />

93% respectively. Right-sided CC was independently associated with lower<br />

DFS in stage II and IIA. Increasing age was associated with lower OS, CSS<br />

and DFS in stage IIA, however we observed only trends in the multivariate<br />

analysis. Surgery alone (without ACT) was associated with a slightly lower<br />

OS in stage IIA (univariate HR 3,659; 95% CI 0,81-16,5; P�0.092); but<br />

not with lower DFS and CSS. Prognosis was not different comparing<br />

FOLFOX vs. 5-FU-based ACT. Conclusions: Our data suggest that LS pts<br />

with stage II CC do not benefit from ACT. FOLFOX was not superior to<br />

5-FU-based ACT. If our results are confirmed, LS pts with stage IIA CC<br />

should not receive ACT. The group <strong>of</strong> stage IIB CC was too small to make<br />

definite conclusions.<br />

OS<br />

Univariate<br />

CSS DFS<br />

HR 95% CI HR 95% CI HR 95% CI<br />

Stage II<br />

(n�278)<br />

Age Per 10y 1,034 0,993-1,08 1,034 0,993-1,08 1,039 0,997-1,08 &<br />

Localization Right<br />

Left 1,58 0,64-3,90 1,58 0,64-3,890 2,78 1,10-6,98 *<br />

T-stage T3<br />

T4 2,12 0,69-6,51 2,12 0,69-6,51 2,66 0,85-8,37 &&<br />

ACT No<br />

Yes 1,37 0,50-3,70 1,37 0,50-3,70 0,99 0,35-2,78<br />

ACT 5-FU<br />

FOLFOX<br />

0,04 0-887 0,04 0-887 1,82 0,33-9,93<br />

Stage IIA<br />

(n�242)<br />

Age Per 10y 1,049 1,000-1,100 ** 1,067 1,000-1,139 *** 1,052 1,003-1,104 §<br />

Localization Right<br />

Left 1,474 0,526-4,131 2,730 0,760-9,805 3,039 1,069-8,683 #<br />

ACT No<br />

Yes 3,659 0,808-16,562 ## 3,974 0,477-33,070 1,566 0,415-5,908<br />

ACT 5-FU<br />

FOLFOX 0,046 0.000-.... 0,045 0.000-.... 1,871 0,169-20,668<br />

*p�0.03; ** p�0.051; *** p� 0.052; § p�0.039; # p� 0.037; ## p�0.092; & p�0.07; && p�0.081.<br />

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer<br />

215s<br />

3549 General Poster Session (Board #24D), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Primary side <strong>of</strong> origin affects the outcome <strong>of</strong> mCRC patients treated with<br />

first-line FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab independently <strong>of</strong> BRAF status and<br />

mucinous histology. Presenting Author: Fotios Loupakis, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA<br />

Background: Several studies tried to address the question <strong>of</strong> whether<br />

primary site <strong>of</strong> CRC could affect the outcome. Those analyses were limited<br />

by small sample size numbers and/or high degree <strong>of</strong> heterogeneity in stage<br />

and received treatments and/or limited information regarding molecular<br />

and pathologic features. Mucinous histology and BRAF mutations are more<br />

frequent in right-sided tumors and are both associated with worse outcome<br />

in the metastic setting. Methods: the analysis was conducted on a database<br />

<strong>of</strong> 455 mCRC prospectively enrolled in a pharmacogenetic translational<br />

study. Patients (pts) were treated with FOLFIRI/bevacizumab. Pts were<br />

excluded if data regarding mucinous histology and/or BRAF mutational<br />

status were lacking or if affected by synchronous right and left-sided<br />

tumors. Results: 200 pts were identified and included in the study.<br />

Mucinous histology, BRAF mutation and right-side primary were found in<br />

35 (17.5%), 14 (7%) and 56 (28%) patients respectively. Right-side<br />

tumors were more frequently BRAF mutated (p�0.001) and the association<br />

was still significant when adjusting for mucinous histology (p�0.001).<br />

There was a trend in the association between mucinous and side (p�0.082).<br />

At a multivariate analysis, pts with right-side primary were at higher risk <strong>of</strong><br />

progression (HR�1.88 [95%CI: 1.25-2.84], p�0.0026) and death<br />

(HR�2.07 [95%CI: 1.23-3.49], p�0.006). At a prespecified analysis in<br />

the subgroup <strong>of</strong> non-mucinous and BRAF wild-type tumors, pts with<br />

right-side primary achieved median PFS and OS <strong>of</strong> 10.0 and 28.9 mos<br />

compared to 13.0 and 47.6 mos <strong>of</strong> left-side (PFS, right vs left: HR�1.87<br />

[95%CI: 1.19-2.91], p�0.003; OS: HR�1.91 [95%CI: 1.07-3.39],<br />

p�0.022). This was again confirmed in a multivariate model. Conclusions:<br />

These data underline a possible strong impact <strong>of</strong> side on the outcome <strong>of</strong><br />

mCRC treated with first-line FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. To give a biological<br />

explanation for these results, a GWAS on germinal DNA and geneexpression<br />

analyses on tumors are ongoing. In order to clarify the prognostic<br />

vs predictive role to antiangiogenic treatments <strong>of</strong> this feature analyses from<br />

2 phase III randomized trials have been planned.<br />

3551 General Poster Session (Board #24F), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

An 18-gene blood-based IVD test for colorectal cancer early detection with<br />

high sensitivity and specificity. Presenting Author: Ye Xu, Fudan University<br />

Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China<br />

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is <strong>of</strong>ten curable particularly diagnosed<br />

at early stages. Different screening strategies are in place in various<br />

counties. However, the compliance rate with current CRC screening<br />

recommendations remains poor. A simple blood-based IVD test would<br />

represent an interesting alternative. We previously reported a 100-gene<br />

signature for early detection <strong>of</strong> CRC using microarray technology. Based on<br />

this result, we have developed a new blood test with real-time PCR<br />

technology. Methods: 144 CRC cases and 153 Controls were enrolled. A<br />

total <strong>of</strong> 52 genes were selected as candidate markers to be transferred from<br />

microarray to real-time PCR. The gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>iles from 100 CRC<br />

cases and 100 Controls were used as a training set for signature discovery.<br />

Signature identification process was conducted by Minimum Redundancy<br />

Maximum Relevance (mRMR) feature selection method and Support Vector<br />

Machine (SVM) classification algorithm under the Leave-One-Out Cross<br />

Validation (LOOCV) framework. The optimal size <strong>of</strong> signature was determined<br />

by a stepwise inclusion selection procedure which started with one<br />

gene and repeatedly added genes one by one until all genes were included.<br />

The performance <strong>of</strong> each N-gene signature by the LOOCV was estimated<br />

and used to determine the best size <strong>of</strong> signature. Results: The gene<br />

expression pr<strong>of</strong>iles measured by microarray and real-time PCR technology<br />

were highly comparable and resulted in a significant correlation in term <strong>of</strong><br />

fold change ratio between CRC cases and Controls (Pearson’s Correlation<br />

Coefficient � 0.95). An 18-gene signature was identified and validated in<br />

an independent validation set with 44 CRC cases and 53 Controls. The<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> 18-gene signature in the validation set reached 88.7%<br />

accuracy (95%CI: 0.80-0.94), 88.6% sensitivity (95%CI: 0.75-0.96),<br />

and 88.7% specificity (95%CI: 0.76-0.95). Conclusions: Our new results<br />

demonstrated the feasibility <strong>of</strong> technology transfer from microarray to<br />

real-time PCR. The blood test could be <strong>of</strong>fered to individuals who are<br />

unwilling or unable to undergo colonoscopy to increase the CRC screening<br />

compliance rate. Meanwhile, its high specificity could also help to avoid<br />

unnecessary colonoscopies.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!