24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1064 General Poster Session (Board #22G), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Low-dose, short-course sunitinib may normalize tumor vasculature and<br />

improve tumor blood flow to enhance chemotherapy efficacy in breast<br />

cancers. Presenting Author: Soo-Chin Lee, National University Cancer<br />

Institute, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore<br />

Background: Small molecule VEGFR inhibitors (VEGFR-I) have failed to<br />

improve outcome with chemotherapy in most solid tumors. Continuous<br />

administration <strong>of</strong> a potent VEGFR-I may destroy vasculature and impede<br />

drug delivery; in contrast, low-dose, short-course VEGFR-I before chemotherapy<br />

may normalize tumor vasculature and enhance drug delivery.<br />

Methods: We conducted a phase Ib followed by phase II randomized study<br />

in patients with measurable primary breast tumors using low-dose sunitinib<br />

(Su) for 1 week prior to doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) and measured<br />

tumor blood flow with DCE-MRI and microvessel density and pericyte<br />

recoverage with CD31 and �-smooth muscle actin (SMA) staining on tumor<br />

biopsies, at baseline, after 1 week <strong>of</strong> Su, and 2 weeks after cycle 1 AC.<br />

Patients in phase Ib received 12.5-25mg Su prior to AC; in phase II,<br />

patients were randomized to AC�/-12.5mg Su. Results: 21 patients have<br />

been enrolled, including 3 patients on 25mg Su�AC, 11 on 12.5mg<br />

Su�AC, and 7 on AC alone. After 1 week <strong>of</strong> 25mg Su, 2/3 patients had<br />

reduced tumor blood flow on DCE-MRI indicating anti-angiogenic effects.<br />

After 1 week <strong>of</strong> 12.5mg Su, significant increase in tumor fractional plasma<br />

volume (Vp) occurred (�28%�28%, p�0.025) suggesting increased<br />

perfusion, followed by decrease 2 weeks after AC (-33%�26%,p�0.035)<br />

corresponding to mean tumor size change <strong>of</strong> -17�15%, while no significant<br />

Vp changes occurred with AC alone (p�0.823); CD31 expression<br />

reduced (20.7 vs 15.7, p�0.173) while SMA/CD31 double staining<br />

increased (2.45 vs 7.34, p�0.046) indicating lower microvessel density<br />

and normalization <strong>of</strong> residual vasculature, which was not seen with AC<br />

alone (CD31, p�0.434; CD31/SMA, p�0.605). The main toxicity <strong>of</strong><br />

Su�AC and AC alone was febrile neutropenia (29% vs 43%). 14 patients<br />

had surgery with pathological complete response in 1/6 patients who<br />

received 12.5mg Su�AC. Conclusions: 25mg Su for 1 week can reduce<br />

tumor blood flow, suggesting that concomitant standard dose Su may<br />

compromise drug delivery. Low dose 12.5mg Su for 1 week is sufficient to<br />

normalize tumor vasculature and increase tumor fractional plasma volume,<br />

and may potentially improve drug delivery and treatment outcome.<br />

1066 General Poster Session (Board #23A), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Early changes in angiogenesis and hypoxia following bevacizumab therapy<br />

in primary breast cancer. Presenting Author: Shaveta Mehta, University<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Oxford, United Kingdom<br />

Background: Bevacizumab (BV), a monoclonal antibody directed against<br />

vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is an approved anti-angiogenic<br />

agent, but despite its widespread use, little is known about how tumours<br />

develop resistance to BV. We have conducted a window-<strong>of</strong>-opportunity<br />

study in which BV is administered as a short-term first-line treatment for<br />

primary breast cancer (PBC) patients, and assessed histological markers <strong>of</strong><br />

tumour angiogenesis and hypoxia before and after therapy. Methods: 47<br />

patients with locally advanced breast cancer were prospectively enrolled.<br />

Informed consent was obtained from all patients. A single infusion <strong>of</strong> BV<br />

(15 mg/kg) was given 2 weeks before starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy.<br />

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and<br />

core biopsies for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis were performed<br />

immediately prior to and 2 weeks after BV. 36 patients with invasive ductal<br />

carcinoma and good quality MRI scans and core biopsies were included in<br />

this analysis. Wilcoxon rank test and Spearman’s correlation test were used<br />

for statistical analysis. Results: IHC revealed a significant upregulation <strong>of</strong><br />

carbonic anhydrase 9 (P � 0.04) and hypoxia inducible factor-1a (P �<br />

0.001) following BV therapy along with a significant reduction in plasmalemma<br />

vesicle associated protein (PLVAP) (p�0.01) and Ki67 (p� 0.006).<br />

DCE-MRI analysis revealed a significant reduction in vessel permeability<br />

and blood flow following BV, as measured by a decrease in the forward<br />

transfer constant Ktrans (P � 0.0001) and the reverse rate constant kep (P �<br />

0.0001). In addition, we found a significant negative correlation between<br />

CA9 levels and median Ktrans at baseline (Spearman’s rho � -0.46; P �<br />

0.01). Conclusions: Using combined DCE-MRI and IHC analysis, we found<br />

that PBC patients treated with single-agent BV showed a decrease in<br />

markers <strong>of</strong> tumour angiogenesis, together with a corresponding increase in<br />

tumour hypoxia. Our results suggest that tumour hypoxia may be a key<br />

mechanism governing the early onset <strong>of</strong> resistance to BV therapy, and argue<br />

for the use <strong>of</strong> suitable combination therapies to overcome the resistance<br />

and ultimately improve patient survival.<br />

Breast Cancer—Triple-Negative/Cytotoxics/Local Therapy<br />

65s<br />

1065 General Poster Session (Board #22H), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Efficacy <strong>of</strong> low-dose capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer. Presenting<br />

Author: Caitlin Bertelsen, Keck School <strong>of</strong> Medicine <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong><br />

Southern California, Los Angeles, CA<br />

Background: The FDA-approved dose <strong>of</strong> capecitabine (cape) <strong>of</strong> 1250mg/m2 twice daily (BID) is associated with treatment-limiting toxicities. Published<br />

reports suggest that lower starting doses <strong>of</strong> cape can be as effective as the<br />

approved dose in treating metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We compared<br />

the efficacy <strong>of</strong> lower than previously published doses <strong>of</strong> cape with results <strong>of</strong><br />

registrational Phase III trials using the approved dose. Methods: We<br />

performed a retrospective analysis <strong>of</strong> patients treated at the University <strong>of</strong><br />

Southern California hospitals who received cape as the first, second, or<br />

third line <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy for MBC to determine the progression-free<br />

survival (PFS) associated with low starting doses. The primary endpoint was<br />

PFS among patients with measurable disease, and secondary aims were to<br />

analyze the relationships between PFS and various clinical characteristics<br />

for all patients. Results: Patients (n�84) received a median cape dose <strong>of</strong><br />

565 mg/m2 BID, <strong>of</strong>ten administered as a flat dose (not adjusted for body<br />

surface area) <strong>of</strong> 1000 mg BID. Median PFS among patients with measurable<br />

disease (n�62) was 4.1 months (95% confidence interval or CI �<br />

2.9-5.7), which was similar to the median PFS values <strong>of</strong> 4.4 months (95%<br />

CI � 4.14-5.42, n�480) (Sparano et al. JCO 2010;28:3256) and 4.2<br />

months (95% CI � 3.81-4.50, n�377) (Thomas et al. JCO 2008;25:<br />

5210) for single-agent cape reported in the major trials with similar<br />

eligibility criteria. Among all patients, PFS was shorter in measurable<br />

disease, triple negative and HER2� subtypes, and was similar in all lines <strong>of</strong><br />

therapy. Only two patients (2.4%) discontinued cape due to toxicity.<br />

Conclusions: These data support the efficacy <strong>of</strong> very low doses <strong>of</strong> cape for<br />

MBC. Prospective randomized controlled trials testing lower starting doses<br />

<strong>of</strong> cape are needed to optimize the benefit/risk ratio.<br />

Variable Median PFS (mo) Multivariate PFS OR p value<br />

Entire cohort 4.4<br />

Non-measurable; measurable 19.7; 4.1 Ref; 1.6 0.13<br />

ER or PR�/HER2-; triple negative; HER2� 8.5; 3.0; 6.0 Ref; 3.2; 2.5 0.011<br />

DFI � 0; >0-5yr 3.0; 4.4; 8.5 Ref; 0.42; 0.36 0.031<br />

No trastuzumab; trastuzumab in HER2� 4.1; 9.6 Ref; 0.31 0.079<br />

OR � odds ratio; DFI � disease free interval; Ref � reference; yr � year.<br />

1067 General Poster Session (Board #23B), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Accuracy <strong>of</strong> MRI, mammography (MG), and 2D and 3D ultrasound<br />

(2DUS/3DUS) in determining the pathologic tumor response after neoadjuvant<br />

chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer patients. Presenting Author:<br />

Markus Hahn, University Hospital Tuebingen, Department <strong>of</strong> Gynecology<br />

and Obstetrics, Tuebingen, Germany<br />

Background: The pathological tumor response in patients with locally<br />

advanced breast cancer to NACT is essential for survival and for surgical<br />

strategies. Therapy monitoring based on German recommendations is<br />

routinely performed by clinical examination, MG and 2DUS. The clinical<br />

value <strong>of</strong> MRI and 3DUS has not been established yet. The aim <strong>of</strong> the study<br />

was to determine the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive<br />

value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) between the different imaging<br />

techniques in predicting postoperative histological tumor response after<br />

NACT. Methods: Patients with primary breast cancer (cT1-T4, cN0-1, M0)<br />

undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2005 and 2010 were<br />

eligible for this prospective trial. The response was measured by MRI, MG,<br />

2DUS and 3DUS for complete or partial remission versus stable disease<br />

after the last cycle <strong>of</strong> treatment and compared with the final pathological<br />

response. Patients with progressive disease were excluded from the study.<br />

Statistical analysis was done by calculating the accuracy <strong>of</strong> each imaging<br />

technique and the size difference between imaging and histological tumor<br />

size. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated for complete or<br />

partial pathological response. The study was approved by the local ethic<br />

committee (BCD001 194/2004). Results: 103 patients with the mean age<br />

<strong>of</strong> 47.7 (range 24.5 – 71.4) years were evaluated. The accuracy was 0.680<br />

(95%CI: 0.580 -0.768) for MRI, 0.563 (95%CI: 0.453-0.669) for MG,<br />

0.724 (95%CI: 0.618 -0.815) for 2DUS and 0.710 (95%CI: 0.588-<br />

0.813) for 3DUS. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 78%, 47%,<br />

75% and 52% for MRI, 61%, 45%, 69% and 36% for MG, 93%, 23%,<br />

74% and 60% for 2DUS, 94%, 19%, 73% and 57% for 3DUS. The mean<br />

(standard deviation) size difference was -1.8 mm (14.8) on MRI, 1.5 mm<br />

(26.0) on MG, -9.1mm (19.1) on 2DUS and for the volume difference<br />

-6916mm3 (15831) on 3DUS. Conclusions: The data suggest that 2DUS is<br />

sufficient in predicting tumor response between NACT treatment. MRI and<br />

MG are more accurate the 2DUS in predicting the tumor size for surgical<br />

planning.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!