24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Lung Cancer—Non-small Cell Local-Regional/Small Cell/Other Thoracic Cancers<br />

7048 General Poster Session (Board #35G), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Breath analysis for early detection <strong>of</strong> lung cancer. Presenting Author:<br />

Geetha D. Vallabhaneni, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University,<br />

Atlanta, GA<br />

Background: Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause <strong>of</strong> cancer death<br />

worldwide. Early detection is critical to reduce LC related mortality. Breath<br />

analysis can be used as a non invasive diagnostic tool in conjunction with<br />

CT screening. We assessed the diagnostic value <strong>of</strong> breath volatile organic<br />

compounds (BVOCs) in the alveolar breath <strong>of</strong> female non-small cell lung<br />

cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods: This is a prospective case-control study<br />

that enrolled newly diagnosed NSCLC and cancer-free female controls. The<br />

study aims: 1) To compare the BVOC signature in female NSCLC patients to<br />

a control group without LC 2) To compare the BVOC signature between<br />

NSCLC and breast cancer (BC) patients. The study was restricted to women<br />

because the pilot data was generated from female subjects with BC.<br />

Consenting eligible patients provided a total <strong>of</strong> five deep breath samples<br />

into a proprietary breath sampler developed at the Georgia Tech Research<br />

Institute (GTRI) for collecting alveolar breath. Breath samples were<br />

collected five minutes apart from each subject. The collected samples were<br />

analyzed for BVOCs using thermal desorption/gas chromatographic/mass<br />

spectrometric (TD/GC/MS) technique. Statistical differences in BVOCs in<br />

breath samples from cases and controls were assessed using this technique.<br />

Support vector machine classification method was employed to<br />

compare the BVOCs pattern between LC and BC patients. Results: We<br />

enrolled 25 NSCLC and 25 cancer-free subjects. TD/GC/MS analysis<br />

identified a total <strong>of</strong> 422 BVOCs among the controls and NSCLC subjects.<br />

75 unique BVOCs that were significantly different between cases and<br />

controls were employed for statistical modeling. This 75 BVOCs signature<br />

has a sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 0.75, a specificity <strong>of</strong> 0.75 and a classification accuracy<br />

<strong>of</strong> 75% for NSCLC and controls. Statistical analysis on the full BVOCs data<br />

set from NSCLC and previously collected BVOCs data from BC patients<br />

achieved a classification accuracy <strong>of</strong> 88%. Conclusions: Unique BVOCs<br />

pattern can identify patients with established NSCLC. Future studies in<br />

at-risk patients will assess the utility <strong>of</strong> this approach as a less invasive and<br />

minimal risk screening tool for early detection <strong>of</strong> NSCLC. Supported by the<br />

Kennedy Seed Grant awarded by the Winship Cancer Institute <strong>of</strong> Emory<br />

University.<br />

7050 General Poster Session (Board #36A), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Case-control study <strong>of</strong> prophylactic cranial irradiation in nonmetastatic<br />

non-small cell lung cancer. Presenting Author: Simon Cheng, Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY<br />

Background: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) reduces the incidence <strong>of</strong><br />

brain metastases in NSCLC patients after primary therapy, but its impact<br />

on survival is uncertain. We report on the largest study <strong>of</strong> survival in<br />

patients treated with and without PCI for non-small cell lung cancer<br />

(NSCLC). Methods: We reviewed 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End<br />

Results (SEER) registries for a retrospective study on patients who had PCI<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> their primary treatment for NSCLC from 1988 - 97. Cases were<br />

limited to those with non-metastatic (Stage I-III) NSCLC. To balance the<br />

cohorts, we matched each PCI patient with four non-PCI patients on stage,<br />

histology, race and sex. Associations between treatment type, clinical<br />

factors, and demographics were assessed using the Chi-squared test.<br />

Survival time was calculated as the number <strong>of</strong> months from diagnosis to the<br />

date <strong>of</strong> death. Survival was censored as <strong>of</strong> the last month when patients<br />

were known to be alive. Overall (OS) and cancer cause-specific survival<br />

(CSS) were investigated using the Kaplan-Meier, competing risks, Cox<br />

proportional hazards, and log-rank tests. Results: We found 472 PCI<br />

matched to 1,888 non-PCI patients. Characteristics were balanced across<br />

groups: race (p � 1.00), sex (p � 0.95), histology (p � 1.00), stage (p �<br />

1.00), and surgery (p � 0.81). PCI group was younger, median age 64 vs<br />

68 (p � 0.01). PCI vs no PCI median OS was 8 vs 10 months (p � 0.01).<br />

OS was 14% vs 28% at 2 years and 5% vs 12% at 5 years, PCI vs no PCI<br />

respectively (p � 0.01). Stage III OS was also different; 10% vs 21% at 2<br />

years, PCI vs no PCI respectively (p � 0.01). Median CSS was the same at 9<br />

months in both groups. Median follow-up was 14 years. Conclusions: PCI<br />

was not associated with improved OS or CSS in these NSCLC patients, and<br />

PCI may have a detrimental effect on OS. In limited-stage small cell lung<br />

cancer, a retrospective SEER analysis during the 1988 – 97 period showed<br />

a survival benefit in treated patients with PCI, which has been confirmed<br />

with prospective studies. To date, 4 prospective trials examining PCI for<br />

NSCLC have shown a reduced incidence <strong>of</strong> brain metastases, but the effect<br />

on survival is unclear. Further investigation is needed to determine whether<br />

PCI for NSCLC increases the risk <strong>of</strong> other causes <strong>of</strong> death.<br />

463s<br />

7049 General Poster Session (Board #35H), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Outcomes <strong>of</strong> combined modality treatment in elderly patients with stage III<br />

non-small cell lung cancer. Presenting Author: Ludimila Cavalcante, Mount<br />

Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL<br />

Background: The use <strong>of</strong> combined modality treatment (CMT) has been<br />

demonstrated to improve survival in patients with inoperable, locally<br />

advanced NSCLC. Elderly patients have been traditionally excluded from<br />

prospective clinical trials investigating CMT and thus the optimal treatment<br />

strategy for these patients remains unclear. We retrospectively evaluated<br />

the outcomes <strong>of</strong> elderly patients who received concurrent and sequential<br />

chemoradiation. Methods: All lung cancer patients age 70 or older who<br />

received chemotherapy and radiation treatment at Mt. Sinai Medical Center<br />

for stage III NSCLC between 1997 and 2010 were analyzed from tumor<br />

registry data. Among 282 lung cancer elderly patients diagnosed with stage<br />

III disease, 64 patients (22.7 %) received CMT as part <strong>of</strong> their treatment.<br />

Patients who underwent surgery and palliative radiation were excluded.<br />

Statistical analysis was performed by log-rank, Kaplan-Meier methods, and<br />

t-test. Results: Median age at diagnosis for the CMT group was 75 years<br />

(70-87), male/female: 34/30, TNM: T4N0-1: 12, T3N1: 1, TXN2: 41,<br />

TXN3: 10. Concurrent chemoradiation was delivered in 43 cases and<br />

sequential in 21 cases. RT doses ranged from 50 to 63 Gy. The most<br />

common chemotherapy regimens used were carboplatin and taxol (44 %)<br />

and carboplatin and etoposide (15%). The most common treatment-related<br />

toxicities were esophagitis (42%), anemia (39%), and pneumonia (24%).<br />

Median survival (MST) was 19 months and 11 months in the concurrent<br />

and sequential chemoradiation groups (p�0.67). Observed two, three and<br />

five-year overall survival (OS) in the CMT group was 49.1%, 27.5%, and<br />

12.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Although CMT is not commonly used in<br />

elderly patients with lung cancer, the treatment is feasible and beneficial<br />

for selected patients in the community setting. Interestingly, the MST <strong>of</strong><br />

elderly patients who received CMT in this cohort was comparable to that <strong>of</strong><br />

younger historical controls with CMT. There was also a trend for increased<br />

survival in the concurrent versus sequential chemoradiation group.<br />

7051 General Poster Session (Board #36B), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Correlation <strong>of</strong> pretreatment surgical staging and PET SUVmax with outcomes<br />

in NSCLC. Presenting Author: Giancarlo Moscol, Albert Einstein<br />

Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA<br />

Background: The AJCC staging does not recognize the number <strong>of</strong> involved<br />

mediastinal lymph nodes (LN), nodal stations or PET findings as prognostic<br />

factors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Most clinical studies report<br />

poorer survival with greater number <strong>of</strong> involved LN and maximal tumor<br />

standardized uptake value (SUVmax) � 5. We hypothesized that clinical<br />

outcomes can be predicted by (1) number <strong>of</strong> involved LN, (2) number <strong>of</strong><br />

involved nodal stations, (3) SUVmax <strong>of</strong> primary tumor and (4) SUVmax <strong>of</strong><br />

mediastinum. Methods: Records <strong>of</strong> patients diagnosed with NSCLC stages<br />

I-IIIA from 1/1/99 to 12/31/10 were reviewed. Data collected included age,<br />

type <strong>of</strong> surgery, AJCC stage, number <strong>of</strong> LN/stations sampled and SUVmax<br />

<strong>of</strong> primary tumor/mediastinum. Primary outcomes were tumor recurrence<br />

and death. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographics.<br />

Prognostic factors were analyzed by a multivariate analysis using Cox’s<br />

proportional hazard model. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier<br />

method. Results: There were 369 patients with complete clinical data; 207<br />

underwent surgical staging with mediastinoscopy (62) or VATS/open<br />

thoracotomy (145). The median number <strong>of</strong> LN sampled was 9 (range 1-35)<br />

and the median number <strong>of</strong> stations biopsied was 3 (range 1-9). PET was<br />

performed in 89 patients; 59 scans showed tumor SUVmax � 5. A total <strong>of</strong><br />

65/207 patients received chemotherapy. With median follow-up time <strong>of</strong> 29<br />

months (range 1-116), 73 recurrences and 90 deaths were observed. Cox<br />

analysis showed greater recurrence risk for patients with 4 or more involved<br />

LN (HR� 4.66, CI�1.19-18.18, p�0.027) and higher mortality for<br />

patients with tumor SUVmax � 5 (HR�14.83, CI�2.32-94.9, p�0.004).<br />

Outcomes did not correlate with the number <strong>of</strong> involved nodal stations<br />

(p�0.76 for recurrence, p�0.51 for mortality) or with SUVmax <strong>of</strong> mediastinum<br />

(p�0.17 for recurrence, p�0.93 for mortality). Conclusions: The<br />

number <strong>of</strong> involved LN was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence<br />

but not for mortality. A tumor SUVmax �5 was independently associated<br />

with greater mortality. The number <strong>of</strong> involved stations and the SUVmax <strong>of</strong><br />

mediastinum did not correlate with worse outcomes. Our results are limited<br />

due to the small number <strong>of</strong> cases with PET/CT scans and short follow-up.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!