24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1504 Oral Abstract Session, Mon, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

Dexrazoxane exposure and risk <strong>of</strong> secondary acute myeloid leukemia in<br />

pediatric cancer patients. Presenting Author: Dana Marie Walker, Children’s<br />

Hospital <strong>of</strong> Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA<br />

Background: Dexrazoxane (DXZ) is an effective cardioprotectant in children<br />

with leukemia and solid tumors. However, the potential risk <strong>of</strong> secondary<br />

acute myeloid leukemia (AML) limits DXZ use. We compared the incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> secondary AML in pediatric cancer patients with and without DXZ<br />

exposure to estimate the risk <strong>of</strong> DXZ-associated secondary AML. Methods:<br />

We conducted a retrospective cohort study <strong>of</strong> anthracycline exposed<br />

pediatric cancer patients (excluding de novo AML) hospitalized from<br />

January 1999 to March 2011 in 43 freestanding children’s hospitals in the<br />

Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. Secondary AML was<br />

defined as an ICD9 code for AML that occurred at least 90 days after first<br />

anthracycline exposure. Proportions <strong>of</strong> patients with secondary AML were<br />

compared between patients with and without an exposure to DXZ after the<br />

initial anthracycline exposure. Results: During the study period <strong>of</strong> interest,<br />

15,532 pediatric cancer patients were exposed to anthracycline, <strong>of</strong> which<br />

1404 (9.04%) subsequently received DXZ. Secondary AML was identified<br />

in 235 (1.51%) patients. Patients � 10 years <strong>of</strong> age, black patients,<br />

patients in New England and the Midatlantic regions, and those with bone<br />

tumors were significantly more likely to have received DXZ. The unadjusted<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> secondary AML in the DXZ exposed and unexposed patients<br />

did not differ significantly (1.21% v. 1.54%, p�0.3308). After adjusting<br />

for these variations in demographics, the incidence <strong>of</strong> secondary AML still<br />

did not significantly differ between DXZ exposed and unexposed patients<br />

(p�0.6224). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that DXZ exposure does not<br />

lead to an increased risk <strong>of</strong> secondary AML in children. These data are<br />

important given the conflicting results from individual clinical trials about<br />

the risk <strong>of</strong> DXZ-associated secondary AML. While subject to well-known<br />

limitations <strong>of</strong> administrative database analyses, these data represent the<br />

largest cohort <strong>of</strong> DXZ exposed patients with available data on the occurrence<br />

<strong>of</strong> secondary AML. Additional multivariate analyses <strong>of</strong> chemotherapeutic<br />

covariates and time to secondary AML are ongoing.<br />

1506 Oral Abstract Session, Mon, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> clinical BRCA1 testing compared with linkage analysis.<br />

Presenting Author: Payal D. Shah, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,<br />

PA<br />

Background: Specific clinical interventions in BRCA mutation carriers<br />

reduces the risk <strong>of</strong> breast and ovarian cancers and may improve survival;<br />

thus,identification <strong>of</strong> mutation carriers is important. The sensitivity <strong>of</strong><br />

current BRCA mutation testing is unclear as a “gold standard” test is<br />

lacking. We assessed the BRCA1 mutation detection rate with current<br />

comprehensive clinical testing using linkage analysis as the comparator.<br />

Methods: 26 families with linkage analyses results available were included<br />

in this analysis. BRCAPRO, BOADICEA, and other risk estimation models<br />

were applied. Maximum-likelihood linkage analyses were performed to<br />

compute two-point and multipoint LOD scores using previously described<br />

BRCA1 –linked genetic markers; scores were classified as linked, not<br />

linked, or suggestive. At least one individual from each family underwent<br />

comprehensive testing. Results: Of 26 families analyzed, 9 demonstrated<br />

linkage and 4 demonstrated suggestive linkage to BRCA1. Of these 13<br />

families, 12 were found to have BRCA1 mutations: a detection rate <strong>of</strong><br />

92.3%. In 3 <strong>of</strong> these 12 families, genetic mutation testing performed prior<br />

to large genomic rearrangement (LGR) testing was negative, demonstrating<br />

an improved detection rate with LGR testing which in this series was 23%.<br />

The 12 families with higher LOD scores and positive mutation testing had<br />

high mean prior probabilities by all models. Families which were not linked<br />

and who tested negative for mutations had lower mean prior probabilities.<br />

In one family, disease demonstrated linkage with a two-point LOD score <strong>of</strong><br />

1.59 and multipoint LOD <strong>of</strong> 0.85 and all risk estimation models yielded<br />

high prior probabilities. Despite this, mutation testing was negative by full<br />

sequencing and MLPA analysis. Conclusions: When evaluated in a sample<br />

<strong>of</strong> families from high-risk clinics, current comprehensive testing compares<br />

well to linkage data. The inclusion <strong>of</strong> LGR testing has improved the<br />

mutation detection capability <strong>of</strong> clinical testing; however, some mutations<br />

may still be missed. Negative mutation testing results should be interpreted<br />

in the context <strong>of</strong> family history and prior probability during<br />

counseling. Despite recent advances, further improvements in genetic<br />

testing are warranted.<br />

Cancer Prevention/Epidemiology<br />

87s<br />

CRA1505 Oral Abstract Session, Mon, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

Quality <strong>of</strong> cancer family history and referral for genetic counseling and<br />

testing among oncology practices: A pilot test <strong>of</strong> quality measures as part <strong>of</strong><br />

the ASCO Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI). Presenting Author:<br />

Marie Wood, University <strong>of</strong> Vermont, Burlington, VT<br />

The full, final text <strong>of</strong> this abstract will be available at<br />

abstract.asco.org at 12:01 AM (EDT) on Monday, June 4,<br />

2012, and in the <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong> online<br />

supplement to the June 20, 2012, issue <strong>of</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> Oncology. Onsite at the <strong>Meeting</strong>, this abstract will<br />

be printed in the Monday edition <strong>of</strong> ASCO Daily News.<br />

1507 Oral Abstract Session, Mon, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

The APC I1307K polymorphism as a significant risk factor for CRC in<br />

average-risk Ashkenazi Jews. Presenting Author: Ben Boursi, Sheba Medical<br />

Center, Ramat Gan, Israel<br />

Background: The I1307K adenomatous polyposis coli gene variant, prevalent<br />

among Ashkenazi Jews, may increase risk for colorectal neoplasia. We<br />

studied the clinical importance <strong>of</strong> screening for this polymorphism in 3305<br />

Israelis undergoing colonoscopic assessment. Methods: Blood samples and<br />

risk factor information were collected from individuals undergoing colonoscopic<br />

examination at our medical center. Germline genetic analysis for the<br />

APC I1307K variant was performed using real-time PCR for DNA extracted<br />

from peripheral mononuclear cells. Results: The overall prevalence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

I1307K polymorphism was 8.0% (10.1% among Ashkenazi while only<br />

2.7% among Sephardic Jews, p�0.001). The overall adjusted odds ratio<br />

(OR) for CR neoplasia among carriers was 1.51(95% CI, 1.16 –1.98).<br />

Among average risk Ashkenazi Jews, the OR was 1.76 (95% CI 1.26-2.45).<br />

On the contrary, among Sephardi subjects the OR was 0.996 (95% CI,<br />

0.51-1.93). A multiplicative interaction was identified between Ashkenazi<br />

ethnicity and APC I1307K carrier status (PINTERACTION�0.055). The<br />

histopathological features <strong>of</strong> adenomas and cancers did not differ between<br />

carriers and non-carriers. Conclusions: The APC I1307K gene variant is an<br />

important risk factor for CRC in average risk Ashkenazi jews and should be<br />

considered for screening in this population.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!