24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4008 Oral Abstract Session, Sat, 3:00 PM-6:00 PM<br />

A randomized controlled phase II study <strong>of</strong> the prophylactic effect <strong>of</strong><br />

urea-based cream on the hand-foot skin reaction associated with sorafenib<br />

in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Presenting Author: Zhenggang Ren,<br />

Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China<br />

Background: Sorafenib (SOR) has become the standard treatment for<br />

advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR)<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> the most common adverse events associated with SOR and its<br />

occurrence can impact patient quality <strong>of</strong> life and lead to dose modification<br />

or interruption, both <strong>of</strong> which may negatively impact clinical outcomes.<br />

This randomized controlled trial is the first large prospective study to<br />

investigate the prophylactic effect <strong>of</strong> urea-based creams on HFSR associated<br />

with SOR. Methods: Patients with advanced HCC treated with SOR<br />

were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive prophylactic urea-based cream (Arm<br />

A) or best supportive care (BSC) following development <strong>of</strong> HFSR (Arm B).<br />

SOR was administered 800 mg daily. Urea-based cream was given twice<br />

daily for up to 12 weeks starting on Day 1. BSC was at the physician’s<br />

discretion and excluded urea-based creams. The primary endpoint was the<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> all-grade HFSR in the first12 weeks. Results: Eight hundred<br />

sixty eight patients were enrolled; 439 patients in Arm A and 432 patients<br />

in Arm B. There was no difference <strong>of</strong> baseline characteristics between two<br />

arms. Over the 12 week period <strong>of</strong> study, the incidence <strong>of</strong> all-grade HFSR<br />

was significantly lower in Arm A compared to Arm B; n�246 (56.0%)<br />

patients in Arm A versus n�318 (73.6%) patients in Arm B, p�0.0001.<br />

The incidence <strong>of</strong> grade �2 HFSR tended to be lower in Arm A compared to<br />

Arm B, but did not reach statistical significance; n�96 (21.9%) patients<br />

Arm A versus n�126 (29.2%) patients in Arm B, p�0.1638. The median<br />

time to the first HFSR event was 2.5 fold longer in Arm A compared to Arm<br />

B; 84 days (95% CI 45-93 days) in Arm A and 34 days (95% CI 29-43<br />

days) in Arm B (p�0.001). Conclusions: This is the first large prospective,<br />

randomized control trial examining the prophylactic use <strong>of</strong> urea-based<br />

creams for treatment <strong>of</strong> HFSR associated with a multikinase inhibitor.<br />

Compared to BSC, prophylactic topical use <strong>of</strong> a urea-based cream appears<br />

to be effective in preventing and/or delaying the incidence <strong>of</strong> HFSR<br />

associated with SOR treatment in patients with advanced HCC.<br />

4010 Poster Discussion Session (Board #2), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> HER2 gene amplification in adenocarcinomas <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stomach or gastroesophageal junction in the INT-0116/SWOG9008 clinical<br />

trial. Presenting Author: Michael Alexander Gordon, Keck School <strong>of</strong><br />

Medicine <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Southern California, Norris Comprehensive<br />

Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA<br />

Background: Trastuzumab has been approved for treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with<br />

HER2-positive metastatic gastric carcinoma; however, relatively little is<br />

known about the role <strong>of</strong> HER2 in the natural history <strong>of</strong> this disease.<br />

Methods: Patients enrolled in the INT-0116/SWOG9008 phase III gastric<br />

cancer clinical trial (n�559) were retrospectively evaluated for HER2 gene<br />

amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)(n�258), overexpression<br />

by immunohistochemistry (IHC)(n�148) and HER2 amplification<br />

by silver-enhanced in situ hybridization (n�77) based on availability <strong>of</strong><br />

tissue specimens. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the original clinical trial was to evaluate<br />

the benefit <strong>of</strong> post-operative 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus radiation therapy<br />

compared to surgery alone. Results: HER2 gene amplification rate by FISH<br />

was 10.9% in tumor tissue from 258 patients evaluated. HER2 status<br />

determined by FISH was 92% concordant with SISH. HER2 overexpression<br />

rate by IHC was 12.2% among 148 patients evaluated, with 90%<br />

agreement between FISH and IHC. There was a significant interaction<br />

between HER2 status by FISH and treatment with respect to both OS<br />

(p�0.034) and DFS (p�0.020). Among patients with HER2 non-amplified<br />

cancers, treated patients had a median OS <strong>of</strong> 44 months compared to 24<br />

months for patients in the surgery only arm (34 and 17 months respectively<br />

for DFS, p�0.003). Among 28 patients with HER2 amplified cancers, the<br />

medians for OS were 16 months in the treated arm, and 22 months in the<br />

surgery arm (p�0.55) (13 and 11 months respectively for DFS, p�0.87).<br />

We were unable to detect a statistically significant treatment benefit in this<br />

small subset <strong>of</strong> patients with HER2 amplification. HER2 amplification<br />

status was not an independent prognostic marker <strong>of</strong> OS among patients<br />

who received no postoperative chemotherapy or radiation therapy (p�0.76).<br />

Conclusions: Patients lacking HER2 amplification responded significantly<br />

to treatment as indicated by both OS and DFS.<br />

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer<br />

241s<br />

4009 Poster Discussion Session (Board #1), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Adverse prognostic impact <strong>of</strong> heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification in<br />

patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Presenting Author: Harry<br />

H. Yoon, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN<br />

Background: HER2 expression in upper digestive cancer is reported to be<br />

heterogeneous, which substantially affects interpretation <strong>of</strong> HER2 positivity<br />

in the clinic. Yet the frequency and prognostic impact <strong>of</strong> HER2 genetic<br />

heterogeneity and polysomy 17 (poly17) are unknown in EAC. Methods:<br />

HER2 amplification (fluorescence in situ hybridization) and protein expression<br />

were examined in untreated surgical EAC specimens (N � 661) at<br />

Mayo Clinic. HER2 genetic heterogeneity was defined per ASCO/CAP as<br />

amplification (HER2/CEP17 ratio � 2) in 5-50% <strong>of</strong> cancer cells; poly17<br />

refers to � 3 copies <strong>of</strong> chromosome 17. Most tumors were T3-4 (68%) or<br />

lymph node (LN)-positive (73%). Cox models were used to assess diseasespecific<br />

(DSS) and overall survival (OS). Results: HER2 amplification was<br />

detected in 117 <strong>of</strong> 661 EACs (18%), <strong>of</strong> which 20 (17%) showed HER2<br />

heterogeneity. HER2 heterogeneous tumors had a significantly higher<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> poly17 and high tumor grade. HER2 heterogeneity by<br />

amplification vs expression were correlated. Since heterogeneity was<br />

limited to HER2-amplified tumors, survival analysis was stratified by<br />

amplification status. In multivariable analysis, only HER2 heterogeneity<br />

and metastatic LN number were prognostic (Table). Conclusions: Among<br />

HER2 amplified EACs, 17% show HER2 heterogeneity, which is associated<br />

with increased poly17 and independently predicts 2-fold higher risk <strong>of</strong><br />

cancer-specific death. Among HER2-nonamplified cases, poly17 is independently<br />

associated with worse survival. These novel findings demonstrate<br />

aggressive subgroups in HER2-amplified and -nonamplified EACs that have<br />

important implications for HER2 analysis and evaluation <strong>of</strong> benefit from<br />

HER2 targeted therapy.<br />

DSS<br />

Variable<br />

a OS a<br />

HR p HR p<br />

HER2-amplified N � 117<br />

Heterogeneity, yes vs no 2.0b 0.025 2.0c 0.026<br />

Grade, 4 v 1-3 1.1 0.7 1.1 0.8<br />

T stage, 3-4 v 1-2<br />

No. LN<br />

1.3 0.2 1.3 0.3<br />

d 1.1 �.001 1.4 �.001<br />

Poly17, yes v no<br />

HER2-nonamplified N � 544<br />

0.7 0.1 0.7 0.1<br />

Heterogeneity None<br />

Grade, 4 v 1-3 1.3 0.01 1.3 0.007<br />

T stage, 3-4 v 1-2<br />

No. LN<br />

2.0 �.001 1.9 �.001<br />

d 1.1 �.001 1.1 �.001<br />

Poly17, yes v no 1.4 0.012 1.3 0.023<br />

a Adjusted for all covariates; b 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 – 3.8; c 95% CI 1.1 – 3.7; d Per metastatic LN.<br />

HR, hazard ratio.<br />

4011 Poster Discussion Session (Board #3), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>iling <strong>of</strong> activated receptor tyrosine kinases in advanced gastric cancers<br />

identifies patients with poor prognosis. Presenting Author: Phillip Sangwook<br />

Kim, Prometheus Laboratories Inc., San Diego, CA<br />

Background: Metastatic gastric cancer (GCA) remains a therapeutic challenge<br />

due to its poor prognosis. Trastuzumab is the only known targeted<br />

therapy that has demonstrated a survival benefit in a small subset <strong>of</strong><br />

metastatic GCAs. Addition <strong>of</strong> molecular diagnostics for predicting prognosis<br />

and therapeutic outcomes can significantly enhance the clinical<br />

management <strong>of</strong> GCAs. Herein, we identify activated receptor tyrosine<br />

kinases (RTKs) in distinct GCA subsets that correlate with disease-free<br />

survival post-curative GCA surgery. Methods: Fresh frozen GCA tissues from<br />

434 stage I to IV GCA patients were pr<strong>of</strong>iled for HER1, HER2, HER3,<br />

p95HER2, c-MET and IGF1R RTKs using the multiplexed Collaborative<br />

Enzyme Enhanced Reactive (CEER) immunoassay. CEER is a highly<br />

sensitive and specific proximity assay that relies on the formation <strong>of</strong> a triple<br />

antibody complex surrounding the target protein. Results: p95HER2, a<br />

known trastuzumab resistance mechanism, was identified for the first time<br />

in 79% <strong>of</strong> IHC/FISH-based HER2(�) GCAs. Full-length HER2 expression<br />

was heterogeneous with ~20% <strong>of</strong> HER2(-) GCAs still expressing the HER2<br />

protein. 232/434 GCAs expressed at least one activated RTK analyzed in<br />

our study. Of these 232 patients, 121 patients that presented with stage II<br />

or III disease at the time <strong>of</strong> surgery; demonstrated a worse progression-free<br />

survival as compared to those where none <strong>of</strong> the analyzed RTKs were<br />

activated (32.6 months vs 76.5 months, p�0.0318). HER axis members<br />

were the most commonly activated RTKs with 64% <strong>of</strong> such GCAs.<br />

Approximately 71% <strong>of</strong> activated cMET tumors demonstrated a coactivation<br />

with a HER axis member with a preference for HER1 in ~61% <strong>of</strong><br />

cMET-activated GCAs. Patients with p-MET(�):p-HER1(�) GCAs had a<br />

worse prognosis as compared to those with p-MET(�):p-HER1(-) GCAs<br />

(46.2 months vs 82.8 months, p�0.0184). Conclusions: CEER-based RTK<br />

characterization revealed concomitantly activated signaling pathways in<br />

GCAs which could predict disease recurrence. Comprehensive molecular<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> GCA tumors can allow for the implementation <strong>of</strong> these companion<br />

biomarkers in GCA therapeutic clinical trials.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!