24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9122 General Poster Session (Board #48D), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

A prospective longitudinal study <strong>of</strong> cancer-related fatigue in patients undergoing<br />

breast-conserving surgery and radiation with or without chemotherapy<br />

for breast cancer. Presenting Author: Mylin Ann Torres, Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA<br />

Background: We prospectively evaluated risk factors for persistent cancerrelated<br />

fatigue in women with breast cancer undergoing lumpectomy with<br />

or without chemotherapy (CTX) prior to whole breast radiotherapy (XRT).<br />

We assessed the potential role <strong>of</strong> inflammatory mediators, demographic<br />

characteristics, and treatment history including CTX. Methods: Following<br />

lumpectomy, 60 women received a definitive course <strong>of</strong> whole breast XRT<br />

(50 Gy plus a 10 Gy boost). Prior to XRT, at week 6 <strong>of</strong> XRT, and 6 weeks<br />

post XRT, subjects completed the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory<br />

(MFI) and underwent blood draws for inflammatory mediators (protein and<br />

mRNA). Results: Independent multivariate analyses <strong>of</strong> clinical and demographic<br />

factors revealed that CTX (p�.001) , given neoadjuvantly or<br />

adjuvantly, and age �50 (p�.03) were significant predictors <strong>of</strong> higher<br />

fatigue scores post XRT. Mean MFI scores in patients treated with CTX<br />

(n�24) were 20 points higher than patients not treated with CTX (p�.001)<br />

with a clinically meaningful difference in scores being 10 points on the<br />

MFI. Gene ontology analysis <strong>of</strong> differentially expressed genes indicated<br />

increased activation <strong>of</strong> genes involved in immune and inflammatory<br />

responses in fatigued vs. non-fatigued patients (p�.001). Of the inflammatory<br />

mediators, plasma IL-6 prior to XRT was the strongest predictor <strong>of</strong> post<br />

XRT fatigue (p�.02). Moreover, plasma IL-6 concentrations prior to XRT<br />

were significantly higher in patients who received CTX (mean 4.96 vs.<br />

2.53, p�.01). Patients who received CTX also had significantly higher<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> NF Kappa B DNA binding 6 weeks post XRT (p�.001), and<br />

transcription factor binding analysis revealed a greater representation <strong>of</strong><br />

genes with the NF Kappa B DNA binding motif in fatigued vs. non-fatigued<br />

patients (p �.05). Conclusions: Collectively, these data suggest an interaction<br />

between CTX and XRT leading to inflammation and fatigue several<br />

weeks post XRT. This relationship was independent <strong>of</strong> whether CTX was<br />

given pre or post-operatively. Treatments targeting inflammation before<br />

XRT may reduce fatigue post therapy, particularly in patients previously<br />

treated with CTX.<br />

9124 General Poster Session (Board #48F), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

A national survey <strong>of</strong> support and information needs <strong>of</strong> Australian women<br />

living with advanced breast cancer. Presenting Author: Linda R. Mileshkin,<br />

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia<br />

Background: Improved treatments mean women with advanced breast<br />

cancer (ABC) are living longer, sometimes for many years. As a result, these<br />

women may experience chronic needs that are different from those with<br />

early breast cancer. We aimed to assess the support and information needs<br />

<strong>of</strong> women living with ABC. Methods: A national postal survey was sent to<br />

2,345 women with ABC registered as members <strong>of</strong> the consumer organizations<br />

BCNA and/or BreaCan. Women were asked about their disease,<br />

treatment, experiences <strong>of</strong> care, and to complete the Supportive Care Needs<br />

Survey. Results: The response rate was 34% (792 valid responses). Mean<br />

age was 57 (range 25-99) with 21% living alone and 27% working. 18%<br />

reported living with ABC for �7 years. 656 (85%) were having current<br />

treatment: chemotherapy (43%), hormonal therapy (46%), bisphosphonates<br />

(49%), and/or trastuzumab (Herceptin) (19%) respectively. 49% <strong>of</strong><br />

women reported having access to a Breast Care Nurse (BCN) since<br />

diagnosis <strong>of</strong> ABC but only 3% cited a BCN or cancer nurse as their main<br />

contact. The majority (76%) cited their medical oncologist as their main<br />

contact, 8% cited their family doctor. Women wanted information about:<br />

treatment options (84.2%), new treatments (79.2%), symptoms/side<br />

effects (78.9%), clinical trials (60.8%), managing pain (57.2%) and<br />

financial assistance (38%). Women � 65 had significantly higher levels <strong>of</strong><br />

unmet needs than those �65 for the 7 items below, including all items<br />

from the sexual domain. Conclusions: Women with ABC have many unmet<br />

needs with younger women particularly needing more support with sexual<br />

needs and anxiety. Women are heavily reliant on their medical oncologist,<br />

who may not be equipped or best placed to meet these needs. Models <strong>of</strong><br />

care need to be developed to address the unmet supportive care needs <strong>of</strong><br />

women living with ABC.<br />

Moderate-high Moderate-high<br />

Item<br />

need < 65<br />

need > 65 P value<br />

Uncertainty about the future 50% 39% 0.009<br />

Concerns about the worries <strong>of</strong><br />

those close to you<br />

48% 35% 0.002<br />

Worry that the results <strong>of</strong><br />

treatment are beyond your control<br />

37% 27% 0.026<br />

Changes in sexual relationships 28% 15% 0.001<br />

Changes in sexual feelings 27% 15% 0.001<br />

Being given information about<br />

sexual relationships<br />

21% 9% �0.0001<br />

More choice about cancer specialists 17% 8% 0.002<br />

Patient and Survivor Care<br />

597s<br />

9123 General Poster Session (Board #48E), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

The relationship among age, anxiety, and depression in older adults with<br />

cancer. Presenting Author: Talia Weiss, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer<br />

Center, New York, NY<br />

Background: Depression and anxiety are common psychological sequelae <strong>of</strong><br />

cancer, resulting in decreased adherence to treatment regimens and longer<br />

hospital stays. In men with prostate cancer, aging is associated with<br />

reduced anxiety and increased depression. The overall goal <strong>of</strong> this study<br />

was to examine the association among age, anxiety, and depression in a<br />

cohort <strong>of</strong> older adults receiving chemotherapy (chemo). Methods: This is a<br />

secondary analysis <strong>of</strong> a prospective longitudinal study investigating chemotherapy<br />

toxicity in older adults with cancer. Eligibility included: age � 65,<br />

diagnosis <strong>of</strong> cancer, and scheduled to receive a new chemo regimen.<br />

Baseline data (pre-chemotherapy) included: age, sociodemographics, tumor<br />

and treatment factors (including tumor type and stage), geriatric<br />

assessment parameters (functional status, comorbidities, psychological<br />

state, nutritional status, social support). Anxiety and depression were<br />

measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Univariate<br />

and multiple regression analyses were conducted to test the relationship<br />

between age, anxiety, and depression. Results: The average age <strong>of</strong> the 500<br />

patients (56% females) was 73.1 (range 65-91, SD�6.18) with 5% Stage<br />

I, 12% Stage II, 22% Stage III and 61% stage IV. Mean depression and<br />

anxiety scores were: 3.6�3.17; 4.7�3.60. <strong>Clinical</strong>ly significant depression<br />

was reported in 12.6% (n�62). <strong>Clinical</strong>ly significant anxiety was<br />

reported in 20.9% (n�103). In univariate analyses, there was no association<br />

between anxiety and age, or depression and age. In multivariable<br />

analyses, older age (beta� -0.07, p � 0.05) was associated with decreased<br />

anxiety, as well as lack <strong>of</strong> social support (p � 0.01) and increased number<br />

<strong>of</strong> comorbidities (p � 0.01). In multivariable analysis, depression was<br />

associated with lack <strong>of</strong> social support (p � 0.01), increased number <strong>of</strong><br />

comorbidities (p � 0.01), and advanced stage (p � 0.01). Conclusions:<br />

This study supports previous research that anxiety decreases with age in<br />

older adults with cancer. However, depression remained constant with<br />

increasing age. Greater resources and attention to identifying and treating<br />

the psychological sequelae <strong>of</strong> cancer in older adults are warranted.<br />

9125 General Poster Session (Board #48G), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> balugrastim compared with pegfilgrastim in patients<br />

with breast cancer who are receiving chemotherapy. Presenting Author:<br />

Constantin D. Volovat, Centrul de Oncologie Medicala, Iasi, Romania<br />

Background: Patients receiving cancer chemotherapy are at an increased<br />

risk <strong>of</strong> neutropenia. Recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factors<br />

(G-CSFs) have been developed to stimulate proliferation and differentiation<br />

<strong>of</strong> neutrophils. Pegfilgrastim is a pegylated recombinant G-CSF that allows<br />

for once-per-cycle dosing. Balugrastim is a long-acting G-CSF composed <strong>of</strong><br />

a genetic fusion between recombinant human serum albumin and G-CSF.<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to compare the efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong><br />

balugrastim and pegfilgrastim in patients with histologically or cytologically<br />

confirmed breast cancer who were scheduled to receive doxorubicin and<br />

docetaxel. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, active-comparator,<br />

noninferiority trial, patients with �1.5x109 neutrophils/L, and �100x109 platelets/L were randomly assigned to subcutaneous injections <strong>of</strong> balugrastim<br />

40 mg (n�153) or pegfilgrastim 6 mg (n�151) with stratifications for<br />

weight, prior chemotherapy exposure, and global location. The primary<br />

efficacy endpoint was the duration <strong>of</strong> severe neutropenia (days with an<br />

absolute neutrophil count �0.5x109 cells/L) during the cycle 1 for the<br />

population <strong>of</strong> patients who did not have major protocol violations. Results:<br />

Mean duration <strong>of</strong> severe neutropenia in cycle 1 was 1.1 days in the<br />

balugrastim group and 1.0 days in the pegfilgrastim group (95% CI for<br />

difference between groups -0.13 to 0.37). Fifty-eight percent <strong>of</strong> patients in<br />

the balugrastim group and 59% in the pegfilgrastim group had severe<br />

neutropenia during cycle 1 (95% CI for difference between groups<br />

-11.98% to 10.41%). Two and 4 patients, respectively, had febrile<br />

neutropenia during cycle 1; no patients in either group had febrile<br />

neutropenia during cycles 2-4. Twenty percent <strong>of</strong> patients in the balugrastim<br />

group and 19% in the pegfilgrastim group had adverse events that the<br />

investigator considered to be related to study medication. Six and 7<br />

patients, respectively, had serious adverse events. Conclusions: The results<br />

<strong>of</strong> this study support the noninferiority <strong>of</strong> balugrastim versus pegfilgrastim,<br />

demonstrating that both compounds have comparable efficacy. There were<br />

no unexpected safety events.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!