Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
9138 General Poster Session (Board #50D), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Prospective cohort study <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy-induced alopecia with or without<br />
scalp cooling. Presenting Author: Julie Lemieux, URESP, Centre de<br />
Recherche FRSQ du CHA Universitaire de Québec, Quebec City, QC,<br />
Canada<br />
Background: Scalp cooling can prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia.<br />
Success varies according to the type <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy. A controversy exists<br />
regarding the use <strong>of</strong> scalp cooling because <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> efficacy data with<br />
modern chemotherapy regimen and safety data. We present a prospective<br />
cohort study design to measure alopecia. Methods: The prospective study<br />
was conducted at the Centre des Maladies du Sein Deschênes-Fabia (CMS)<br />
in Quebec City (where scalp cooling is <strong>of</strong>fered routinely and 85% <strong>of</strong> women<br />
use it) and at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montreal (CHUM), in<br />
Montreal (where scalp cooling is not available). Women were eligible if they<br />
were going to receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for breast<br />
cancer. The study involved completion <strong>of</strong> questionnaires (on degree <strong>of</strong><br />
alopecia, hair type, hair care, use <strong>of</strong> head accessories, tolerance to scalp<br />
cooling and questions related to sick leave from work) and having pictures<br />
taken at baseline, cycle 3 and at the last cycle <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy. For the last<br />
43 patients, the EORTC QLQ-C30/BR23 and an adaptation for Hairdex<br />
were added. Results: A total <strong>of</strong> 136 patients were recruited (110 at CMS<br />
over 2 years and 26 at the CHUM over a 9-month period). Preliminary<br />
efficacy results are shown in the Table (data on quality <strong>of</strong> life have not yet<br />
been analyzed). Hair preservation was defined as a SUCCESS for hair loss<br />
(since the beginning <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy) characterized as “not at all”, “a<br />
little” or “moderate” and “FAILURE” when characterized as “a lot” or “all”<br />
or “hair shaved”. Overall, in the scalp cooling group, 34% were considered<br />
a “success” using hairdresser evaluation and 49% using patient evaluation;<br />
for the non scalp-cooling group, these rates were 9% and 4%<br />
respectively. Conclusions: Scalp cooling appears to be efficacious for<br />
preventing chemotherapy-induced alopecia in this exploratory cohort study.<br />
Success <strong>of</strong> scalp cooling as assessed at last cycle <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy.<br />
CMS<br />
CHUM<br />
(n�99 evaluable)<br />
(n�23 evaluable)<br />
Hairdresser evaluation<br />
AC 7 (32%) 1 (25%)<br />
TC 14 (45%) 0 (0%)<br />
FEC-D 6 (20%) 0 (0%)<br />
Other 7 (44%) 1 (9%)<br />
Total 34 (34%) 2 (9%)<br />
Patient evaluation N(%) N(%)<br />
AC 8 (36%) 0<br />
TC 19 (61%) 0<br />
FEC-D 12 (40%) 0<br />
Other 9 (56%) 1 (9%)<br />
Total 48 (49%) 1 (4%)<br />
9140 General Poster Session (Board #50F), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Validation <strong>of</strong> the chemotherapy-induced neuropathy assessment scale.<br />
Presenting Author: Sheeba K. Thomas, University <strong>of</strong> Texas M. D. Anderson<br />
Cancer Center, Houston, TX<br />
Background: Many <strong>of</strong> the assessment tools used to assess peripheral<br />
neuropathy in clinical trials focus on painful neuropathy. However, some<br />
chemotherapy agents cause both painful and non-painful peripheral<br />
neuropathy. The Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Scale<br />
(CINAS) was designed to evaluate the multi-dimensional nature <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy-induced<br />
neuropathy, including non-painful sensory and motor<br />
deficits. This study evaluated the psychometric properties <strong>of</strong> the CINAS in<br />
patients with multiple myeloma (MM) receiving induction chemotherapy<br />
and/or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Methods: We<br />
collected demographic and clinical data and administered 2 items measuring<br />
pain and numbness/tingling at its worst (0-10 scale), and the CINAS. A<br />
total CINAS score was computed by summing all 11 CINAS items. For<br />
reliability and validity analyses, we used the highest total CINAS score for<br />
each patient. Validity was assessed by factor analysis and by correlating<br />
CINAS subscales with the pain and numbness/tingling items. Cronbach<br />
alpha reliability coefficients were computed. To test sensitivity, we compared<br />
change in total CINAS score during induction from baseline to last<br />
total CINAS score in a subset <strong>of</strong> patients (N�20) receiving bortezomib or<br />
thalidomide. We hypothesized that such patients would develop neuropathy.<br />
Results: Ninety patients were enrolled. <strong>Part</strong>icipants were primarily<br />
white (90%) and male (63%). Factor analysis revealed 3 underlying<br />
constructs for the CINAS - sensory, motor functioning, and allodynia -<br />
explaining 74% <strong>of</strong> the common variance. Cronbach alphas were 0.84,<br />
0.85, and 0.83 for the sensory, motor functioning, and allodynia subscales,<br />
respectively, while subscale correlations with the numbness/<br />
tingling item were 0.74, 0.56, and 0.52, respectively. Pain was only<br />
modestly correlated with these subscales (0.21, 0.36, 0.29). Total CINAS<br />
scores <strong>of</strong> patients receiving bortezomib or thalidomide induction worsened<br />
significantly (from 3.4 to 11.9, effect size�0.55, p�.02). Conclusions:<br />
The CINAS demonstrated validity, reliability and sensitivity in patients with<br />
MM during and after chemotherapy and can be used to assess the<br />
multidimensional aspects <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy-induced neuropathy.<br />
Patient and Survivor Care<br />
601s<br />
9139 General Poster Session (Board #50E), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Advance care planning (ACP) among hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT)<br />
patients and bereaved caregivers. Presenting Author: Elizabeth T. Loggers,<br />
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA<br />
Background: HCT remains a high risk, potentially curative treatment<br />
typically <strong>of</strong>fered to young, otherwise healthy patients with hematologic<br />
malignancies. Given this, patients and caregivers may not have considered<br />
end-<strong>of</strong>-life ACP. This study investigated the effect <strong>of</strong> pre-transplant ACP in<br />
surviving patients or bereaved caregivers. Methods: A retrospective, mixedmethods,<br />
audio-taped telephone survey adapted from validated instruments<br />
was conducted by a trained interviewer with English-speaking HCT<br />
survivors (n�18) and bereaved caregivers (n�11), 6-12 months post-HCT.<br />
Subjects were identified via HCT databases at two high-volume, tertiary<br />
centers between 2001-2003. Analysis included percentages from quantitative<br />
sections and qualitative transcripts coding by 2 investigators, with<br />
differences resolved by consensus. Results: HCT survivors [median age 47<br />
years (range 33-67); 50% college-educated; all white] were interviewed a<br />
median <strong>of</strong> 13 months after HCT for acute leukemia (7), lymphoma (5), or<br />
other (6). Twelve (67%) had discussed mortality risk pre-HCT with the<br />
medical team; <strong>of</strong> these, 83% felt hope was increased or unchanged (I/U)<br />
and 100% felt clinician commitment to transplant was I/U by the<br />
conversation. Regardless <strong>of</strong> whether mortality was discussed, 50% had<br />
living wills and �75% had a formal proxy, yet 67% didn’t discuss mortality<br />
with family members pre-HCT. “Ignorance is bliss” was expressed by 6<br />
survivors while 2 survivors regretted not discussing mortality risk. Bereaved<br />
caregivers [73% spouses; all W] were interviewed a median <strong>of</strong> 10 months<br />
after their loved one’s death, which occurred a median <strong>of</strong> 31 days (range<br />
13-152) post-HCT. 100% were the patient’s proxy. Nine (82%) had<br />
discussed mortality risk pre-HCT with the medical team; <strong>of</strong> these, 78% felt<br />
hope was I/U, 100% felt clinician commitment to transplant was I/U, and<br />
78% discussed EOL preferences with the patient pre-HCT, with 67%<br />
feeling ACP reduced burden. Four expressed appreciation for “the straight<br />
story.” Conclusions: Discussions <strong>of</strong> potential mortality with patients and<br />
caregivers before HCT did not affect hope, and supported confidence in<br />
medical teams.<br />
9141 General Poster Session (Board #50G), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Physical and functional well-being in women with breast cancer taking<br />
gabapentin for hot flashes. Presenting Author: Kavita Dayal Chandwani,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY<br />
Background: Hot flashes reduce quality <strong>of</strong> life (QOL) in women with breast<br />
cancer. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial <strong>of</strong> gabapentin<br />
for hot flashes, 900 mg <strong>of</strong> the drug was found to reduce hot flashes in<br />
women with breast cancer; however, their QOL <strong>of</strong> has not been studied. We<br />
conducted secondary analyses to study two domains <strong>of</strong> QOL: physical<br />
(PWB) and functional well-being (FWB) in women in this trial. Methods: A<br />
nationwide sample <strong>of</strong> women with breast cancer and hot flashes � 2/day<br />
was studied at baseline (T1), 4 weeks (T2), and 8 weeks (T3) <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
with gabapentin 300mg/day (G300) and 900mg/day (G900) in divided<br />
doses, and a matching placebo (PL). PWB and FWB were assessed via<br />
subscales <strong>of</strong> the Functional Assessment <strong>of</strong> Cancer Therapy-Breast. Linear<br />
mixed model analyses <strong>of</strong> PWB and FWB were conducted, adjusted for<br />
demographic and treatment variables. Results: The mean age <strong>of</strong> women<br />
(N�384) was 54.9 years � 8.07 (range: 31-81, 72% �50 years); 76%<br />
were married; 71% had more than high school education; 95% were<br />
Caucasian and 3% African-<strong>American</strong>; 10% were undergoing chemotherapy,<br />
and 9% radiotherapy (RT). PWB showed significant time effect<br />
(p�.0001) and interaction <strong>of</strong> time and treatment (p�.0001). There was an<br />
improvement in PWB in the G300 by T2 with no change at T3, while the<br />
improvement in PL and G900 was more modest at T2 and continued at T3<br />
(PL - T1 20.7, T2 21.2, T3 21.6; G300 - T1 20.9, T2 22.2, T3 22.2; and<br />
G900 - T1 21.2, T2 21.5, T3 21.7). FWB also showed a significant time<br />
effect (p�.001) and interaction <strong>of</strong> time and treatment (p�.002). FWB in<br />
G300 improved by T2, with no additional improvement at T3; it was<br />
unchanged in G900 at T2 with a slight reduction at T3; PL showed a<br />
modest improvement at T2 followed by a modest worsening at T3 (PL - T1<br />
17.8, T2 18.1, T3 17.9; G300 - T1 17.9, T2 18.6, T3 18.6; G900 - T1<br />
18.6, T2 18.6, T3 18.5). Conclusions: As reported previously, G900 is<br />
effective in reducing hot flashes. In this analysis, however, PWB and FWB<br />
showed different patterns <strong>of</strong> change over time between the two gabapentin<br />
and placebo groups with G900 showing minimal effects on PWB and FWB.<br />
Future trials to further study the changes in physical and functional<br />
well-being <strong>of</strong> women with breast cancer taking gabapentin for hot flashes<br />
are needed.<br />
Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.