24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9138 General Poster Session (Board #50D), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Prospective cohort study <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy-induced alopecia with or without<br />

scalp cooling. Presenting Author: Julie Lemieux, URESP, Centre de<br />

Recherche FRSQ du CHA Universitaire de Québec, Quebec City, QC,<br />

Canada<br />

Background: Scalp cooling can prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia.<br />

Success varies according to the type <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy. A controversy exists<br />

regarding the use <strong>of</strong> scalp cooling because <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> efficacy data with<br />

modern chemotherapy regimen and safety data. We present a prospective<br />

cohort study design to measure alopecia. Methods: The prospective study<br />

was conducted at the Centre des Maladies du Sein Deschênes-Fabia (CMS)<br />

in Quebec City (where scalp cooling is <strong>of</strong>fered routinely and 85% <strong>of</strong> women<br />

use it) and at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montreal (CHUM), in<br />

Montreal (where scalp cooling is not available). Women were eligible if they<br />

were going to receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for breast<br />

cancer. The study involved completion <strong>of</strong> questionnaires (on degree <strong>of</strong><br />

alopecia, hair type, hair care, use <strong>of</strong> head accessories, tolerance to scalp<br />

cooling and questions related to sick leave from work) and having pictures<br />

taken at baseline, cycle 3 and at the last cycle <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy. For the last<br />

43 patients, the EORTC QLQ-C30/BR23 and an adaptation for Hairdex<br />

were added. Results: A total <strong>of</strong> 136 patients were recruited (110 at CMS<br />

over 2 years and 26 at the CHUM over a 9-month period). Preliminary<br />

efficacy results are shown in the Table (data on quality <strong>of</strong> life have not yet<br />

been analyzed). Hair preservation was defined as a SUCCESS for hair loss<br />

(since the beginning <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy) characterized as “not at all”, “a<br />

little” or “moderate” and “FAILURE” when characterized as “a lot” or “all”<br />

or “hair shaved”. Overall, in the scalp cooling group, 34% were considered<br />

a “success” using hairdresser evaluation and 49% using patient evaluation;<br />

for the non scalp-cooling group, these rates were 9% and 4%<br />

respectively. Conclusions: Scalp cooling appears to be efficacious for<br />

preventing chemotherapy-induced alopecia in this exploratory cohort study.<br />

Success <strong>of</strong> scalp cooling as assessed at last cycle <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy.<br />

CMS<br />

CHUM<br />

(n�99 evaluable)<br />

(n�23 evaluable)<br />

Hairdresser evaluation<br />

AC 7 (32%) 1 (25%)<br />

TC 14 (45%) 0 (0%)<br />

FEC-D 6 (20%) 0 (0%)<br />

Other 7 (44%) 1 (9%)<br />

Total 34 (34%) 2 (9%)<br />

Patient evaluation N(%) N(%)<br />

AC 8 (36%) 0<br />

TC 19 (61%) 0<br />

FEC-D 12 (40%) 0<br />

Other 9 (56%) 1 (9%)<br />

Total 48 (49%) 1 (4%)<br />

9140 General Poster Session (Board #50F), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Validation <strong>of</strong> the chemotherapy-induced neuropathy assessment scale.<br />

Presenting Author: Sheeba K. Thomas, University <strong>of</strong> Texas M. D. Anderson<br />

Cancer Center, Houston, TX<br />

Background: Many <strong>of</strong> the assessment tools used to assess peripheral<br />

neuropathy in clinical trials focus on painful neuropathy. However, some<br />

chemotherapy agents cause both painful and non-painful peripheral<br />

neuropathy. The Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Scale<br />

(CINAS) was designed to evaluate the multi-dimensional nature <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy-induced<br />

neuropathy, including non-painful sensory and motor<br />

deficits. This study evaluated the psychometric properties <strong>of</strong> the CINAS in<br />

patients with multiple myeloma (MM) receiving induction chemotherapy<br />

and/or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Methods: We<br />

collected demographic and clinical data and administered 2 items measuring<br />

pain and numbness/tingling at its worst (0-10 scale), and the CINAS. A<br />

total CINAS score was computed by summing all 11 CINAS items. For<br />

reliability and validity analyses, we used the highest total CINAS score for<br />

each patient. Validity was assessed by factor analysis and by correlating<br />

CINAS subscales with the pain and numbness/tingling items. Cronbach<br />

alpha reliability coefficients were computed. To test sensitivity, we compared<br />

change in total CINAS score during induction from baseline to last<br />

total CINAS score in a subset <strong>of</strong> patients (N�20) receiving bortezomib or<br />

thalidomide. We hypothesized that such patients would develop neuropathy.<br />

Results: Ninety patients were enrolled. <strong>Part</strong>icipants were primarily<br />

white (90%) and male (63%). Factor analysis revealed 3 underlying<br />

constructs for the CINAS - sensory, motor functioning, and allodynia -<br />

explaining 74% <strong>of</strong> the common variance. Cronbach alphas were 0.84,<br />

0.85, and 0.83 for the sensory, motor functioning, and allodynia subscales,<br />

respectively, while subscale correlations with the numbness/<br />

tingling item were 0.74, 0.56, and 0.52, respectively. Pain was only<br />

modestly correlated with these subscales (0.21, 0.36, 0.29). Total CINAS<br />

scores <strong>of</strong> patients receiving bortezomib or thalidomide induction worsened<br />

significantly (from 3.4 to 11.9, effect size�0.55, p�.02). Conclusions:<br />

The CINAS demonstrated validity, reliability and sensitivity in patients with<br />

MM during and after chemotherapy and can be used to assess the<br />

multidimensional aspects <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy-induced neuropathy.<br />

Patient and Survivor Care<br />

601s<br />

9139 General Poster Session (Board #50E), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Advance care planning (ACP) among hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT)<br />

patients and bereaved caregivers. Presenting Author: Elizabeth T. Loggers,<br />

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA<br />

Background: HCT remains a high risk, potentially curative treatment<br />

typically <strong>of</strong>fered to young, otherwise healthy patients with hematologic<br />

malignancies. Given this, patients and caregivers may not have considered<br />

end-<strong>of</strong>-life ACP. This study investigated the effect <strong>of</strong> pre-transplant ACP in<br />

surviving patients or bereaved caregivers. Methods: A retrospective, mixedmethods,<br />

audio-taped telephone survey adapted from validated instruments<br />

was conducted by a trained interviewer with English-speaking HCT<br />

survivors (n�18) and bereaved caregivers (n�11), 6-12 months post-HCT.<br />

Subjects were identified via HCT databases at two high-volume, tertiary<br />

centers between 2001-2003. Analysis included percentages from quantitative<br />

sections and qualitative transcripts coding by 2 investigators, with<br />

differences resolved by consensus. Results: HCT survivors [median age 47<br />

years (range 33-67); 50% college-educated; all white] were interviewed a<br />

median <strong>of</strong> 13 months after HCT for acute leukemia (7), lymphoma (5), or<br />

other (6). Twelve (67%) had discussed mortality risk pre-HCT with the<br />

medical team; <strong>of</strong> these, 83% felt hope was increased or unchanged (I/U)<br />

and 100% felt clinician commitment to transplant was I/U by the<br />

conversation. Regardless <strong>of</strong> whether mortality was discussed, 50% had<br />

living wills and �75% had a formal proxy, yet 67% didn’t discuss mortality<br />

with family members pre-HCT. “Ignorance is bliss” was expressed by 6<br />

survivors while 2 survivors regretted not discussing mortality risk. Bereaved<br />

caregivers [73% spouses; all W] were interviewed a median <strong>of</strong> 10 months<br />

after their loved one’s death, which occurred a median <strong>of</strong> 31 days (range<br />

13-152) post-HCT. 100% were the patient’s proxy. Nine (82%) had<br />

discussed mortality risk pre-HCT with the medical team; <strong>of</strong> these, 78% felt<br />

hope was I/U, 100% felt clinician commitment to transplant was I/U, and<br />

78% discussed EOL preferences with the patient pre-HCT, with 67%<br />

feeling ACP reduced burden. Four expressed appreciation for “the straight<br />

story.” Conclusions: Discussions <strong>of</strong> potential mortality with patients and<br />

caregivers before HCT did not affect hope, and supported confidence in<br />

medical teams.<br />

9141 General Poster Session (Board #50G), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Physical and functional well-being in women with breast cancer taking<br />

gabapentin for hot flashes. Presenting Author: Kavita Dayal Chandwani,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY<br />

Background: Hot flashes reduce quality <strong>of</strong> life (QOL) in women with breast<br />

cancer. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial <strong>of</strong> gabapentin<br />

for hot flashes, 900 mg <strong>of</strong> the drug was found to reduce hot flashes in<br />

women with breast cancer; however, their QOL <strong>of</strong> has not been studied. We<br />

conducted secondary analyses to study two domains <strong>of</strong> QOL: physical<br />

(PWB) and functional well-being (FWB) in women in this trial. Methods: A<br />

nationwide sample <strong>of</strong> women with breast cancer and hot flashes � 2/day<br />

was studied at baseline (T1), 4 weeks (T2), and 8 weeks (T3) <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

with gabapentin 300mg/day (G300) and 900mg/day (G900) in divided<br />

doses, and a matching placebo (PL). PWB and FWB were assessed via<br />

subscales <strong>of</strong> the Functional Assessment <strong>of</strong> Cancer Therapy-Breast. Linear<br />

mixed model analyses <strong>of</strong> PWB and FWB were conducted, adjusted for<br />

demographic and treatment variables. Results: The mean age <strong>of</strong> women<br />

(N�384) was 54.9 years � 8.07 (range: 31-81, 72% �50 years); 76%<br />

were married; 71% had more than high school education; 95% were<br />

Caucasian and 3% African-<strong>American</strong>; 10% were undergoing chemotherapy,<br />

and 9% radiotherapy (RT). PWB showed significant time effect<br />

(p�.0001) and interaction <strong>of</strong> time and treatment (p�.0001). There was an<br />

improvement in PWB in the G300 by T2 with no change at T3, while the<br />

improvement in PL and G900 was more modest at T2 and continued at T3<br />

(PL - T1 20.7, T2 21.2, T3 21.6; G300 - T1 20.9, T2 22.2, T3 22.2; and<br />

G900 - T1 21.2, T2 21.5, T3 21.7). FWB also showed a significant time<br />

effect (p�.001) and interaction <strong>of</strong> time and treatment (p�.002). FWB in<br />

G300 improved by T2, with no additional improvement at T3; it was<br />

unchanged in G900 at T2 with a slight reduction at T3; PL showed a<br />

modest improvement at T2 followed by a modest worsening at T3 (PL - T1<br />

17.8, T2 18.1, T3 17.9; G300 - T1 17.9, T2 18.6, T3 18.6; G900 - T1<br />

18.6, T2 18.6, T3 18.5). Conclusions: As reported previously, G900 is<br />

effective in reducing hot flashes. In this analysis, however, PWB and FWB<br />

showed different patterns <strong>of</strong> change over time between the two gabapentin<br />

and placebo groups with G900 showing minimal effects on PWB and FWB.<br />

Future trials to further study the changes in physical and functional<br />

well-being <strong>of</strong> women with breast cancer taking gabapentin for hot flashes<br />

are needed.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!