24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

430s Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, and Transplantation<br />

6556 General Poster Session (Board #16G), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Maintenance therapy with arsenic after induction in an alternative and<br />

long-term case for the prevention <strong>of</strong> recurrence <strong>of</strong> acute promyelocytic<br />

leukemia during the period between November 2005 and December 2011.<br />

Presenting Author: Mozaffar Aznab, Kermanshah University <strong>of</strong> Medicine,<br />

Kermanshah, Iran<br />

Background: Arsenic trioxide has been used in the first line treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

acute promyelocytic leukemia and also for recurrence after ATRA and<br />

chemotherapy. In this study, it we used it in induction <strong>of</strong> remission and<br />

maintenance therapy Methods: Between November 2005 to December<br />

2011, 42 patients admitted in our department with APL diagnosis. There<br />

were 27 male and 15 women with a median age <strong>of</strong> 28 years. Arsenic<br />

trioxide started at 0.15 mg/kg intravenous infusion till patient’s bone<br />

marrows achieve to complete remission. Then, after 28 days rest, we did<br />

consolidation with Arsenic trioxide with the same dosage for 28 more days.<br />

We continued treatment with 14 days courses <strong>of</strong> Arsenic trioxide every 3-4<br />

months for 2 years, as maintenance therapy Results: Four patients died<br />

during the first 20 days <strong>of</strong> treatment. Thirty-eight patients achieved to<br />

remission. Two patients refused to continue treatment after achieving to<br />

remission and excluded from this study. Thirty-six patients finished whole<br />

treatment. After a median follow-up <strong>of</strong> 54 months, 4 patients died due to<br />

disease relapse and one patient relapsed and initiated treatment with<br />

Arsenic and ATRA. Five patients faced leukocytosis over 100,000/ml. In<br />

these cases we were obligated to discontinue Arsenic for 3-4 days and did<br />

chemotherapy by Danourobicin for 2 days. Totally 8 patients died during<br />

remission induction and long-term follow up. One year, 3 and 5 years RFS<br />

were 97%, 87.1% and 79.4 respectively and we didn’t observe any relapse<br />

for patients who remained in remission after 5 years. Finally, 31 patients<br />

are alive and free <strong>of</strong> disease. The overall survival was 79.5% for our cohort.<br />

Conclusions: Arsenic trioxide is an effective treatment as the first line<br />

therapy for new cases <strong>of</strong> APL and long term therapy with will reduce the risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> diseases recurrence without any major toxicity in long time.<br />

6558 General Poster Session (Board #17A), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Response rates in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia<br />

with FLT3-ITD mutation using 5-azacitadine plus sorafenib. Presenting<br />

Author: Mona Lisa Alattar, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Houston Health Science<br />

Center, Houston, TX<br />

Background: The outcome <strong>of</strong> patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia<br />

(AML) with FLT3-ITD mutation is poor. Sorafenib is an inhibitor <strong>of</strong> FLT-3<br />

kinase activity in nanomolar concentrations. We conducted this phase II<br />

study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability <strong>of</strong> the combination <strong>of</strong><br />

Sorafenib and 5-Aza for the treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with refractory or<br />

relapsed AML with the particular emphasis on those with FLT3-ITD<br />

mutation. Methods: Patients were eligible if they had relapsed or refractory<br />

AML and were 18 years <strong>of</strong> age or older. They received 5-Aza 75 mg/m2 daily<br />

x 7 together with Sorafenib 200 mg BID X 28 days; cycles were repeated in<br />

approximately 1-month intervals. Responses were assessed after first cycle<br />

and then at the discretion <strong>of</strong> the treating physician at the time <strong>of</strong> the best<br />

peripheral blood response. Results: 32 patients with AML with a median age<br />

<strong>of</strong> 61 years (range, 24-87) were enrolled. They included 13 (41%) with<br />

diploid cytogenetics, 9 (28%) with complex cytogenetics, and 10 (31%)<br />

with miscellaneous chromosomal abnormalities. FLT-3-ITD was detected<br />

prior to the initiation <strong>of</strong> treatment in 30/32 patients. Patients had received<br />

a median <strong>of</strong> 2 prior treatments (range, 1-6). 12 (38%) patients had<br />

received �3 prior regimens and 11 had failed therapy with a FLT3 kinase<br />

inhibitor (6 with AC220, 1 with PKC412, and 5 with sorafenib, either as<br />

monotherapy or with plerixafor); 2 had failed 2 prior FLT3 inhibitors. 10<br />

patients were inevaluable as they never received therapy or discontinued it<br />

before response assessment at one month. The overall CR/CRi rate among<br />

the 22 evaluable patients is 50%, including 9 (41%) with CRi and 2 (9%)<br />

with CR; with a median <strong>of</strong> 3 (range, 1-9) treatment cycles. The median time<br />

to achieving CR/CRi was 3 months (range, 1-4) and the median duration <strong>of</strong><br />

CR/CRi was 3 months (range, �1–5.5). Three patients proceeded to<br />

allogeneic stem cell transplant. The most common study drug-related<br />

adverse events were rash and fatigue with no deaths attributable to study<br />

medications. Conclusions: Combination <strong>of</strong> 5-Aza and Sorafenib is promising<br />

for the treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with relapsed and refractory AML with<br />

FLT-3-ITD mutation and may allow them to proceed to stem cell transplant.<br />

6557 General Poster Session (Board #16H), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> ROR1-targeting small molecules on chronic lymphocytic leukemia<br />

(CLL) cells. Presenting Author: Hakan Mellstedt, Karolinska University<br />

Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden<br />

Background: There is a great interest to develop targeting drugs for CLL,<br />

both MAbs and small molecules, to improve the outcome for the disease.<br />

ROR1, a receptor tyrosine kinase, is overexpressed on CLL cells but not on<br />

normal cells. ROR1 is constitutively phosphorylated and siRNA transfection<br />

induces leukemic cell death. The aim <strong>of</strong> the study is to produce small<br />

molecules inhibiting the cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase activity <strong>of</strong> ROR1,<br />

which could induce specific killing <strong>of</strong> leukemic cells. Methods: A highthroughput<br />

screening assay in 384-format has been developed measuring<br />

phosphorylation <strong>of</strong> a substrate peptide by human recombinant intracellular<br />

ROR-1 kinase domain. A collection <strong>of</strong> 80.000 small molecules has been<br />

screened generating two chemical series. Novel leads have been synthesized<br />

and structure-activity-relationship has been developed using the<br />

assay. Results: Three compounds were selected (KAN0173631,<br />

KAN0438063, KAN0438175T). Freshly isolated leukemic CLL cells were<br />

used as targets in addition to PBMC from healthy donors to test cytotoxicity.<br />

The three compounds induced specific apoptosis <strong>of</strong> CLL cells (Annexin V/PI<br />

and MTT) both at 24 and 48h. Efficacy index (EI), i.e. killing <strong>of</strong> leukemic<br />

cells in relation to normal PBMC was favourable. The most promising drug<br />

KAN0438063 had an EI <strong>of</strong> 40 i.e. killed 40 times more CLL cells than<br />

PBMC at an IC50 <strong>of</strong> 10�M. The compounds induced PARP cleavage and<br />

cleavage <strong>of</strong> caspases 8 and 9 as well as down regulation <strong>of</strong> Mcl-1 and Bcl-xl<br />

(Western Blot). ROR1 was dephosphorylated (Western Blot). The selective<br />

apoptotic effect was compared to other small molecules targeting non-<br />

ROR1 structures in CLL (PCI-32765, CAL-101, R406, R788, STK-<br />

156485, STK-156133) and our compounds were significantly more<br />

effective (EI) (p�0.001). Conclusions: We have developed effective and<br />

selective series <strong>of</strong> compounds targeting ROR1 with promising ADMET<br />

properties. ROR1 targeting small molecules might also be effective for<br />

other tumor cells expressing ROR1 as has been noted for e.g. pancreatic<br />

carcinoma cells. Our model molecules will be further optimized and tested<br />

in animal tumor models. These molecules represent the first small<br />

molecules targeting ROR1 – a “survival factor” in CLL.<br />

6559 General Poster Session (Board #17B), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Post hoc analysis <strong>of</strong> relationship between baseline white blood cell count<br />

and survival outcome in a randomized phase III trial <strong>of</strong> decitabine in older<br />

patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Presenting Author:<br />

Chris Arthur, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, Australia<br />

Background: In a large phase III trial (N�485), patients (pts) �65y with<br />

newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) received 1-h IV infusion <strong>of</strong><br />

decitabine (DAC) 20 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days every 4 wk or treatment<br />

choice (TC) with supportive care or cytarabine 20 mg/m2 subcutaneous<br />

injection for 10 consecutive days every 4 wk (NCT00260832; Kantarjian et<br />

al. JCO, in press). Enrolled pts had white blood cell (WBC) count �40<br />

x109 /L; baseline WBC counts were relatively low (median [range] DAC: 3.1<br />

x109 /L [0.3-127.0]; TC: 3.7 x109 /L [0.5-80.9]). This post hoc analysis<br />

assessed baseline WBC count and survival outcome. Methods: Overall<br />

survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were summarized by<br />

baseline WBC subgroups (�1, 1-5, �5 x109 /L). Results: Mature survival<br />

data (2010) were based on intent-to-treat (ITT) population (446 deaths:<br />

TC, n�227; DAC, n�219). OS was 5.0 mo for TC vs 7.7 mo for DAC<br />

(nominal P�.037). For each WBC subgroup, differences in OS for TC vs<br />

DAC were not significant (NS), but hazard ratios (HR) favored DAC for all<br />

subgroups (Table). There was a significant difference in PFS in favor <strong>of</strong> DAC<br />

for patients with baseline WBC 1–5 x109 /L (P�.005; HR�0.67) and �5<br />

x109 /L (P�.027; HR�0.71). Conclusions: These data are consistent with<br />

overall results, with a trend toward improved outcome with DAC regardless<br />

<strong>of</strong> baseline WBC count in older pts with newly diagnosed AML. Further<br />

analyses are warranted.<br />

Outcome WBC x10 9 /L<br />

TC<br />

Median, a mo<br />

Event/n<br />

OS All pts 5.0<br />

227/243<br />

�1 4.9<br />

20/22<br />

1-5 5.9<br />

106/115<br />

�5 4.3<br />

94/99<br />

PFS All pts 2.1<br />

221/243<br />

�1 2.2<br />

20/22<br />

1-5 2.9<br />

110/115<br />

�5 2.1<br />

98/99<br />

DAC<br />

Median, a mo<br />

Event/n<br />

7.7<br />

219/242<br />

8.6<br />

22/25<br />

9.5<br />

104/119<br />

6.3<br />

88/93<br />

3.7<br />

221/242<br />

5.5<br />

24/25<br />

3.8<br />

111/119<br />

3.4<br />

89/93<br />

Nominal P value b<br />

HR (95% CI) c<br />

P�.037<br />

HR�0.82 (0.68, 0.99)<br />

P�NS<br />

HR�0.85 (0.42, 1.70)<br />

P�NS<br />

HR�0.78 (0.58, 1.03)<br />

P�NS<br />

HR�0.82 (0.60, 1.10)<br />

P�.003<br />

HR�0.75 (0.62, 0.91)<br />

P�NS<br />

HR�1.05 (0.56, 1.97)<br />

P�.005<br />

HR�0.67 (0.51, 0.89)<br />

P�.027<br />

HR� 0.71 (0.53, 0.97)<br />

a Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates. b 2-sided log-rank test. c Stratified Cox regression<br />

model (age and cytogenetic risk as strata; treatment group as covariate). HR �1 means<br />

advantage for DAC.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!