24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1024 Poster Discussion Session (Board #16), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

A gene expression signature <strong>of</strong> MEK pathway activation to predict survival<br />

in triple-negative breast cancer. Presenting Author: Justin M. Balko,<br />

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN<br />

Background: Tumor cell proliferation measured by Ki67 in the surgically<br />

removed tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been shown to<br />

predict patient outcome in breast cancer. It is unclear from these studies if<br />

breast cancer subtype may account in part for the predictive ability <strong>of</strong> Ki67.<br />

Thus, we tested whether Ki67 score in the surgically-resected residual<br />

tumor (RT) after NAC predicted outcome in a cohort <strong>of</strong> triple negative<br />

breast cancer (TNBC). Gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>iling was performed to identify<br />

molecular subtype and test the association with gene modules indicative <strong>of</strong><br />

signaling pathway activation. Methods: Ki67 was scored in the RT <strong>of</strong> 89<br />

patients with stage II-III TNBC (ER/PR/HER2 negative by IHC at diagnosis)<br />

that had been treated with NAC. Expression levels for 450 genes were<br />

quantified by Nanostring. Ki67, node and menopause status, age, therapy<br />

type (� taxanes), molecular subtype, and gene expression scores were<br />

tested for association to RFS and OS using univariate and multivariate<br />

CoxPH models. Results: Ki67 score in the post-NAC RT demonstrated a<br />

wide range (1.5-77.7%; median: 36.2%). Twenty seven % <strong>of</strong> RTs were 3�<br />

HER2 by IHC. Molecular subtype in the RT was as follows: 64% Basal-like;<br />

20% HER2-enriched; 6% LumA; 6% LumB; 4% Normal-like. In univariate<br />

analyses to respectively predict RFS and OS, node status (p�0.005 and<br />

p�0.02), number <strong>of</strong> nodes (p�0.003 and p�0.001), and the score <strong>of</strong> a<br />

gene expression module <strong>of</strong> MEK pathway activation (p�0.04 and p�0.01,)<br />

were significant. Basal-like subtype approached significance for RFS<br />

(p�0.1) and OS (p�0.05). In multivariate analyses, node status (p�0.002<br />

for RFS and p�0.001 for OS) and MEK pathway activation score (p�0.04<br />

and p�0.01) were significant predictors. Conclusions: Ki67 in the RT after<br />

NAC was not predictive <strong>of</strong> outcome in a cohort <strong>of</strong> TNBC. However, a gene<br />

expression signature <strong>of</strong> activated MEK was negatively associated with<br />

outcome. These data are consistent with the reported preclinical activity <strong>of</strong><br />

MEK inhibitors against basal-like breast cancer cells and a possible role <strong>of</strong><br />

this signaling pathway in chemotherapy resistance. They also support deep<br />

sequencing studies to identify genetic alterations in the RAS/MEK/MAPK<br />

pathway in TNBC.<br />

1026 Poster Discussion Session (Board #18), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

A phase II study <strong>of</strong> preoperative (preop) bevacizumab (bev) followed by<br />

dose-dense (dd) doxorubicin (A)/cyclophosphamide (C)/paclitaxel (T) in<br />

combination with bev in HER2-negative operable breast cancer (BC).<br />

Presenting Author: Sara M. Tolaney, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston,<br />

MA<br />

Background: Two recent preop studies evaluating bev showed conflicting<br />

results, particularly in hormone receptor (HR)� BC. Identification <strong>of</strong><br />

predictive markers and their relationship to the pharmacodynamic effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> bev would facilitate the identification <strong>of</strong> BCs most likely to benefit from<br />

bev. To accomplish these goals, we conducted a unique preop trial with a<br />

run-in <strong>of</strong> single agent bev followed by ddACT with bev in two cohorts, one<br />

with HR�HER2– BC, and a smaller triple negative (TN) cohort. Methods:<br />

Pts with HR�, HER2– or TN BC were eligible if their tumor (T) was �1.5<br />

cm and high grade, or had axillary LN involvement; or if T�2.5cm and was<br />

low/intermediate grade. Treatment consisted <strong>of</strong> a single dose <strong>of</strong> bev 10<br />

mg/kg, followed two wks later by A 60 mg/m2 and C 600 mg/m2 with bev 10<br />

mg/kg q2 wks x 4, followed by T 175 mg/m2 with bev 10 mg/kg q2 wks x 3,<br />

followed by T 175 mg/m2 x1. Research core biopsies and interstitial fluid<br />

pressure (IFP) were assessed pre- and post- bev alone. Pathologic response<br />

was confirmed centrally and Miller-Payne (MP) was assessed. Results: 84<br />

pts with HR� and 20 pts with TN breast cancer were enrolled. Amongst<br />

HR� pts, 74 had surgical tissue centrally reviewed, and 6 (8%) had a pCR.<br />

Amongst TN pts, 18 pts had tissue centrally reviewed and 8 (44%) had a<br />

pCR. Grade was found to predict MP response in both HR� and TN pts<br />

(p�0.001). Several biomarkers were evaluated as predictors <strong>of</strong> response to<br />

bev. Baseline sVEGFR1 correlated with MP response to treatment among<br />

TN pts (p�0.015). Single-agent bev reduced the mean vascular density by<br />

18.5% (p�0.049) in HR� patients and the mean IFP in the overall cohort<br />

and HR� patients by 20 (p�0.020) and 24.5% (p�0.001), respectively.<br />

The reductions in IFP correlated with higher levels <strong>of</strong> sVEGFR2 (p�0.003).<br />

The IFP decreased � 50% in 24/65 pts and did not change in others. Gene<br />

expression pr<strong>of</strong>iling by PAM50 is underway. Conclusions: The addition <strong>of</strong><br />

bev to preop chemotherapy is well tolerated. Tumor grade appears to<br />

predict MP response in HR� and TN tumors, and sVEGFR1 may be a<br />

predictor <strong>of</strong> MP response to bev in TN tumors. Further work for biomarker<br />

predictors <strong>of</strong> response to bev is ongoing.<br />

Breast Cancer—Triple-Negative/Cytotoxics/Local Therapy<br />

55s<br />

1025 Poster Discussion Session (Board #17), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

NSABP FB-6: Phase II trial <strong>of</strong> weekly paclitaxel (WP) and pazopanib<br />

following doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) as neoadjuvant therapy<br />

for HER2-negative locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Presenting<br />

Author: Antoinette R. Tan, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel<br />

Project and The Cancer Institute <strong>of</strong> New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ<br />

Background: Pazopanib is an oral, small molecule inhibitor <strong>of</strong> VEGFR-1, -2,<br />

and-3, PDGFR-�, and -�, and c-kit tyrosine kinases. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this<br />

trial was to determine the activity and safety pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> pazopanib when<br />

added to neoadjuvant WP following AC in LABC. The primary endpoint was<br />

pathologic complete response in the breast and nodes (pCR-BN). Methods:<br />

Women with HER2-negative stage IIIA-IIIC breast cancer were treated with<br />

AC (60 mg/m2 /600 mg/m2 ) for 4 cycles every 3 weeks followed by WP 80<br />

mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for 4 cycles concurrently with<br />

pazopanib 800 mg orally daily prior to surgery. Postoperatively, pazopanib<br />

was given for 6 months. The regimen would be considered active if �14<br />

responses (16% pCR rate in breast and nodes) were observed in 87<br />

evaluable patients. Patients were considered evaluable if they received at<br />

least 1 dose <strong>of</strong> pazopanib. Results: Between July 2009 and March 2011,<br />

101 pts (median age 51 yrs, range 30-71) were enrolled; 56% had stage<br />

IIIA, 34% stage IIIB, and 10% stage IIIC disease. 74 pts (73%) had<br />

ER-and/or PR-positive tumors and 27 pts (27%) were triple negative. 8<br />

patients did not begin pazopanib. The pCR-BN rate in evaluable patients<br />

for whom surgical information was known was 18% (16/89). The pCR-BN<br />

rate in ER positive disease was 9% (6/65) and was 42% (10/24) in TNBC.<br />

Toxicities observed with WP and pazopanib included diarrhea (gr 2/3,<br />

10%/5%), hand-foot syndrome (gr 2/3, 11%/1%), hypertension (gr 2/3,<br />

12%/3%), neuropathy (gr 2/3, 14%/1%), and neutropenia (gr 3/4, 25%/<br />

1%). Liver toxicity during WP and pazopanib included ALT (gr 2/3/4,<br />

13%/7%/1%), AST (gr 2/3, 7%/7%), and total bilirubin (gr 2, 2%).<br />

Conclusions: A regimen <strong>of</strong> WP and pazopanib following AC was active as<br />

neoadjuvant therapy in women with LABC and met the pre-specified criteria<br />

<strong>of</strong> interest. The activity in TNBC was notable. The toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> WP and<br />

pazopanib was consistent with previous experience. Support: GlaxoSmith-<br />

Kline.<br />

1027 Poster Discussion Session (Board #19), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Association <strong>of</strong> a compact 13-gene VEGF signature with OS in E2100.<br />

Presenting Author: Scooter Willis, Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL<br />

Background: E2100, an open-label, randomized, phase III trial, demonstrated<br />

a significant improvement in progression free survival and overall<br />

response rate with paclitaxel plus bevacizumab compared with paclitaxel<br />

alone as initial chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative metastatic<br />

breast cancer. Genentech completed additional clinical trials and submitted<br />

these data to the FDA. On 18 Nov, 2011, the FDA Commissioner<br />

revoked the agency’s approval <strong>of</strong> bevacizumab for the breast cancer<br />

indication because <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> evidence <strong>of</strong> an improvement in overall<br />

survival or a clinical benefit to patients sufficient to outweigh the risks.<br />

However, the Commissioner “encouraged Genentech to consider additional<br />

studies to identify if there are select subgroups <strong>of</strong> women who might benefit<br />

from this drug”. Hu et al. (BMC Medicine 2009) published a compact 13<br />

gene VEGF-signature associated with distant metastases and poor outcomes.<br />

Supervised analyses comparing patients with distant metastases<br />

versus primary tumors or regional metastases showed that the distant<br />

metastases were distinct and distinguished by the lack <strong>of</strong> expression <strong>of</strong><br />

fibroblast/mesenchymal genes, and by the high expression <strong>of</strong> a 13 gene<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile that included VEGF, ANGPTL4, ADM and the monocarboxylic acid<br />

transporter SLC16A3. Methods: We have investigated the VEGF signature in<br />

silico on Illumina DASL analysis <strong>of</strong> 122 FFPE samples remaining from<br />

E2100. Results: PFS benefit is seen for pacli � bev vs pacli in both<br />

treatment arms with the low VEGF signature (HR 0.45 95% CI .27-.77 p<br />

.009 n 67) and with the high VEGF signature (HR 0.57 95% CI .32-1.0 p<br />

.015 n 55). However, OS benefit is only seen for pacli � bev vs pacli in the<br />

high VEGF group (HR 0.56 95% CI .30-1.05 p .02 n 52) and not in<br />

patients with the low VEGF signature (HR 1.12 95% CI .66-1.90 p .81 n<br />

67). Conclusions: Hence, this signature, which suggests that the response<br />

to hypoxia includes the ability to promote new blood and lymphatic vessel<br />

formation, shows great potential as a predictive biomarker <strong>of</strong> those patients<br />

to whom bevacizumab would convey an OS advantage benefit. We note with<br />

great caution that this exploratory analysis <strong>of</strong> trial subset is underpowered,<br />

hence, this compact VEGF signature is being pursued in other bevacizumab<br />

trial sets.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!