24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2047 General Poster Session (Board #13B), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> the addition <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy to radiotherapy on cognitive<br />

function in patients with low-grade glioma: Secondary analysis <strong>of</strong> RTOG<br />

98-02. Presenting Author: Roshan Sudhir Prabhu, Winship Cancer Institute,<br />

Emory University, Atlanta, GA<br />

Background: The addition <strong>of</strong> PCV chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RT) for<br />

patients with WHO grade II glioma improves progression free survival (PFS)<br />

and overall survival (OS), for patients surviving at least 2 years (Shaw, J Clin<br />

Oncol 26: 2008). The effect <strong>of</strong> therapy intensification on cognitive function<br />

(CF) remains a concern in this population with substantial long term<br />

survival. Methods: 251patients with WHO grade II glioma and age � 40<br />

with any extent <strong>of</strong> resection, or age � 40 with subtotal resection/biopsy<br />

were randomized to RT (54Gy) or RT � PCV. 111 patients with age � 40<br />

and gross total resection were observed. CF was assessed by mini-mental<br />

status exam (MMSE)at baseline and years 1, 3, and 5 for patients without<br />

progression. Change in MMSE score from baseline <strong>of</strong> � 3 points was<br />

considered clinically significant. Results: Overall, very few patients experienced<br />

significant decline in MMSE score, with a median follow-up time <strong>of</strong><br />

9.7 years for alive patients. There were no significant differences in the<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> patients experiencing MMSE decline between study arms at<br />

any time point. The table below summarizes MMSE change from baseline<br />

over time. Neither baseline MMSE score nor change in MMSE at year 1<br />

significantly predicted for OS or PFS, but there was a trend towards worse<br />

OS for patients with MMSE loss <strong>of</strong> � 2 points [HR 1.73, 95% CI (0.86,<br />

3.47), p�0.12]. Conclusions: The MMSE is a relatively insensitive tool that<br />

has not been validated in patients receiving cranial RT, and subtle changes<br />

in CF may have been missed. However, the addition <strong>of</strong> PCV to RT for low<br />

grade glioma did not result in significantly higher rates <strong>of</strong> MMSE decline<br />

than RT alone or observation. There was a trend towards an MMSE decline<br />

<strong>of</strong> � 2 points at year 1 predicting for worse OS.<br />

Observation (%) RT (%) RT � PCV (%)<br />

Significant MMSE decline<br />

Year 1 0 / 62 (0) 5 / 74 (6.8) 2 / 51 (3.9)<br />

Year 3 0 / 44 (0) 1 / 48 (2.1) 0 / 43 (0)<br />

Year 5<br />

No MMSE change<br />

0/27(0) 0/22(0) 2/25(8)<br />

Year 1 60 / 62 (96.8) 66 / 74 (89.2) 44 / 51 (86.3)<br />

Year 3 44 / 44 (100) 45 / 48 (93.8) 38 / 43 (88.4)<br />

Year 5<br />

Significant MMSE gain<br />

27 / 27 (100) 21 / 22 (95.5) 20 / 25 (80)<br />

Year 1 2 / 62 (3.2) 3 / 74 (4.1) 5 / 51 (9.8)<br />

Year 3 0 / 44 (0) 2 / 48 (4.2) 5 / 43 (11.6)<br />

Year 5 0 / 27 (0) 1 / 22 (4.5) 3 / 25 (12)<br />

2049 General Poster Session (Board #13D), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Predictive role <strong>of</strong> MGMT status in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients<br />

(PTS) treated with antiangiogenic drug (AD) plus temozolomide (TMZ) or<br />

CPT-11. Presenting Author: Giuseppe Lombardi, Medical Oncology 1,<br />

Istituto Oncologico Veneto-IRCCS, Padua, Italy<br />

Background: Methylation and silencing <strong>of</strong> MGMT promoter is a favourable<br />

predictive factor in PTS with GBM treated with single alkylating agent such<br />

as TMZ. Yet, MGMT is an important resistance determinant to CPT-11<br />

activity. AD can be administered in second line treatment as single agent or<br />

in combination to cytotoxic drugs. We analyzed the predictive role <strong>of</strong> MGMT<br />

status in PTS treated with AD plus TMZ or CPT-11 as second line<br />

treatment. Methods: Retrospectively, 55 PTS were analyzed: 36 (65%) with<br />

unmethlyated MGMT, 19 (35%) with methylated MGMT; 3 (5%) PTS with<br />

IDH1 mutations. 17 (31%) PTS performed a reoperation before the second<br />

line treatment and MGMT status was changed in 2 (18%) PTS, IDH1 status<br />

was unchanged in all PTS. 32 PTS were treated with sorafenib 800mg/die<br />

plus TMZ 40mg/m2/die, 23 with bevacizumab 10mg/Kg plus irinotecan<br />

every two weeks. Tumor response was evaluated by clinician assessment<br />

and by MRI according to RANO criteria every two months or when clinically<br />

indicated. Results: Among all PTS, median PFS was 2.7 months (95%CI<br />

1.5-3.5), median OS from start <strong>of</strong> AD was 7.3 months (95%CI 6.02-8.5),<br />

6-month PFS was 32%; no significant differences were observed and<br />

MGMT status was balanced between the two AD groups (p�0.05).<br />

Analyzing MGMT status at first surgery, according to univariate analyses<br />

there were no significant differences in terms <strong>of</strong> PFS (3.5ms vs 2.1ms;<br />

p�0.2), OS (6.5ms vs 7.2ms; p�0.1) and 6-PFS (HR�0.2, CI95%<br />

0.05-1.07) between PTS with unmethylated and methylated MGMT,<br />

respectively. On multivariate analysis, adjusted for performance status, age<br />

and cytotoxic drug, MGMT status was not statistically significant in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

PFS (p�0.8) and OS (p�0.1). Yet, no significant differences emerged with<br />

MGMT status at second surgery as well as analyzing the two AD groups,<br />

separately. Conclusions: MGMT status might not be a predictive factor in<br />

recurrent GBM patients treated with AD plus TMZ or CPT-11 as second line<br />

treatment, although MGMT status may change in some PTS between first<br />

and second surgery. In conclusion, the outcome <strong>of</strong> patients with recurrent<br />

GBM receiving AD plus TMZ or CPT-11 is not significantly influenced by<br />

MGMT methylation status.<br />

Central Nervous System Tumors<br />

127s<br />

2048 General Poster Session (Board #13C), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

First results <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy after hyperbaric oxygenation with temozolomide<br />

for high-grade gliomas. Presenting Author: David Hamid Khelif,<br />

Service de Radiothérapie Groupe Hospitalier sud Reunion, Saint Pierre,<br />

Reunion<br />

Background: The outcome <strong>of</strong> patients with high-grade gliomas remains poor<br />

despite modern therapeutic arsenal. The objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to<br />

assess the feasibility and efficacy <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy (RT) given immediately<br />

after hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO) with Stupp protocol. Methods: All<br />

patients with histologically confirmed high-grade gliomas from 2008 till<br />

2011 coveraged at GHSR hospital were enrolled. Patients underwent<br />

Stupp protocol consisting in 60 Gy RT with a daily dose <strong>of</strong> 2 Gy for 5 days<br />

per week administrated immediately after HBO. Temozolomide (TMZ) was<br />

administrated at the daily dose 75 mg/m², 7 days per week followed by 6<br />

cycles <strong>of</strong> TMZ 150 to 200 mg/m² for 5 days each 28 day-cycle. HBO<br />

schedule was approximately 15 min <strong>of</strong> compression with air, 60 min <strong>of</strong><br />

100% oxygen inhalation and 10 min <strong>of</strong> decompression with oxygen.<br />

Results: A total <strong>of</strong> 21 patients were diagnosed and histologically confirmed<br />

high grade gliomas. Five were excluded because <strong>of</strong> HBO contraindications.<br />

Twelve patients (75%) had undergone debulking surgery. The time interval<br />

from completion <strong>of</strong> decompression to start <strong>of</strong> irradiation was less than 15<br />

minutes (mean 14.25, range 8-18). Twelve patients (75%) received the<br />

complete dose <strong>of</strong> RT and TMZ. HBO was completed for 7 (43.75%). Five<br />

(31.25%) were temporarily stopped and 4 (25%) were definitively stopped.<br />

One patient (6.25%) suffered from pancytopenia with grade 4 thrombopenia<br />

and grade 3 neutropenia. The median follow up was 46.95 weeks<br />

(range 5.7-108.3). Nine patients (56.25%) are still alive. Four (25%) have<br />

a survival more than 16 months. Conclusions: HBO with Stupp protocol is<br />

feasible and promising but requiring a large multicentric study.<br />

2050 General Poster Session (Board #13E), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Phase II trial <strong>of</strong> sunitinib malate and lomustine in patients with temozolomide<br />

refractory recurrent low-grade and anaplastic gliomas. Presenting<br />

Author: Johnny Duerinck, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium<br />

Background: Recurrent low-grade and anaplastic gliomas eventually transform<br />

to a higher grade that is characterized by neo-angiogenesis. Sunitinib<br />

inhibits multiple tyrosine kinase receptors (including VEGFR, PDGFR and<br />

c-Kit) but has no meaningful activity as a mono-therapy for recurrent<br />

glioblastoma when given at a daily dose <strong>of</strong> 37,5 mg (Neyns et al. J<br />

Neurooncol. 2011). We investigated sunitinib in combination with lomustine<br />

(CCNU) for the treatment <strong>of</strong> patients (pts) with temozolomide (TMZ)<br />

refractory recurrent low-grade or anaplastic glioma. Methods: Pts received a<br />

daily dose <strong>of</strong> 25 mg sunitinib for 28 consecutive days followed by a 14 days<br />

treatment-free interval. CCNU was administered as a single dose (80<br />

mg/m²) on day 14 <strong>of</strong> a 6w cycle. T1 � Gd and T2/FLAIR weighted MRI<br />

images were obtained q6 wks. 18FET-PET was performed at baseline and<br />

reassessed in responding pts. Results: 13 pts were enrolled (mean age 40<br />

[range 33-49]; M/F 8/5; KPS 80-90/70-60: 8/5 pts). All pts had PD<br />

following surgery, RT and TMZ. In 7 pts, treatment was initiated at 2nd<br />

recurrence, in 4 pts at 3rd recurrence and in 2 pts at the 4th recurrence.<br />

Most frequent AEs where fatigue (gr 2: n� 3; gr 3: n� 1), thrombopenia (gr<br />

2: n� 1gr3:n�3 gr4: n� 1), neutropenia (gr 2: n� 2; gr3: n� 2; gr4: n�<br />

2) and lymphopenia (gr 2: n�1; gr 3: n�2; gr 4: n�1). In 5/13 pts CCNU<br />

had to be discontinued because <strong>of</strong> AEs. Treatment with sunitinib was<br />

continued in these cases without reoccurrence <strong>of</strong> AEs. BOR according to<br />

RANO criteria: 1 CR, 1 PR (not-confirmed) and 2 SD (DCR: 4/13� 31%).<br />

In the patient with CR, FET-PET indicated a complete metabolic response.<br />

After a mean FU <strong>of</strong> 7 mths (range 2 -19), 5 pts are alive. The 6-month PFS<br />

is 23% (3/13 pts); median PFS is 1,8 mths (95%CI 1.0 - 2,7). A durable<br />

disease control was obtained in 3 pts (TTP respectively 14.8, 11.8� and<br />

19.2� mths). Conclusions: in this heavily pretreated population with<br />

recurrent low-grade and anaplastic glioma the combination <strong>of</strong> sunitinib and<br />

CCNU is associated with acceptable toxicity and <strong>of</strong>fers a durable progressionfree<br />

survival in a subgroup <strong>of</strong> pts. Molecular predictive factors identifying<br />

the sensitive population would be needed to justify further clinical<br />

investigation <strong>of</strong> this combination.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!