05.01.2013 Views

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>PM2.5</strong> <strong>in</strong> the UK<br />

98<br />

4.4 A critical assessment of emission <strong>in</strong>ventories for<br />

modell<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>PM2.5</strong> concentrations<br />

54. Modell<strong>in</strong>g concentrations of <strong>PM2.5</strong> from emissions data is complicated by<br />

the fact that it requires <strong>in</strong>ventories for a range of pollutants, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g direct<br />

emissions of <strong>PM2.5</strong> itself as well as its precursor gases SO2, NOx, NH3 and<br />

NMVOCs. These pollutants are emitted <strong>in</strong> vary<strong>in</strong>g amounts from different<br />

sources and exhibit different spatial and temporal behaviour. With contributions<br />

from four different precursor gases and direct emissions to concentrations of<br />

ambient <strong>PM2.5</strong>, there are therefore more emission sources to <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventories used <strong>in</strong> modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>PM2.5</strong> concentrations than are required to model<br />

other pollutant concentrations. Many of these, especially non-combustion<br />

and diffuse sources, are very difficult to quantify. Many of the major sources<br />

of <strong>PM2.5</strong> <strong>in</strong> the atmosphere, both primary and secondary, are also difficult to<br />

regulate and control. Because of the wide variety of pollutants and sources that<br />

contribute to direct <strong>PM2.5</strong> emissions and to its formation <strong>in</strong> the atmosphere,<br />

the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> the emission <strong>in</strong>ventories for each of these pollutants and<br />

sources are compounded <strong>in</strong> the models used to estimate concentrations.<br />

55. Modellers turn to emission <strong>in</strong>ventories as the primary source of emissions data.<br />

For anthropogenic emissions these are developed ma<strong>in</strong>ly by national <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />

agencies. There is a well-established mechanism for report<strong>in</strong>g national emission<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventories driven by the requirements of <strong>in</strong>ternational bodies, such as the UN<br />

and EU, under various protocols. The emphasis is on provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ventories us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

common methodologies so that <strong>in</strong>ventories provided by different countries are<br />

comparable and are also consistent with other national statistics, for example<br />

on energy consumption. This leads to a method of account<strong>in</strong>g for emissions<br />

which is ideal for policy-makers, who can identify which are the major sources<br />

and assess the costs and benefits of alternative control strategies. This approach<br />

works particularly well for greenhouse gases where the long-lived nature of<br />

these emitted gases means they can be treated almost as a commodity that<br />

can be traded; this is evident <strong>in</strong> the concept of “emission trad<strong>in</strong>g schemes”.<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g common <strong>in</strong>ventory approaches that def<strong>in</strong>e what sources are and are<br />

not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> national <strong>in</strong>ventories is also ideal for track<strong>in</strong>g progress aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

national emission reduction targets. For this, most national <strong>in</strong>ventories are fit<br />

for purpose. They may also be adequate for air <strong>quality</strong> modell<strong>in</strong>g of primary<br />

pollutants.<br />

56. However, national <strong>in</strong>ventories may fall short of what is required by models for<br />

<strong>PM2.5</strong> concentrations. Simply know<strong>in</strong>g the annual rate of emissions for a given<br />

pollutant and source sector is not sufficient, nor is it sufficient to consider<br />

only anthropogenic sources. The spatial and temporal variation <strong>in</strong> emissions is<br />

important and this is far less well-understood than the annual rate of emissions<br />

at a national level which is usually derived from national statistical datasets.<br />

The question is how do emissions vary with time of day and day of the week<br />

and season, where exactly do they occur and what are the <strong>in</strong>fluences of<br />

meteorological factors? Whilst some of these aspects can be assessed, e.g. for<br />

combustion sources, many cannot, especially for fugitive sources of dust and<br />

many agricultural processes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!