Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Concentrations and composition of <strong>PM2.5</strong><br />
3.6.2 Relationship of hourly mean <strong>PM2.5</strong> concentrations with air mass<br />
trajectory<br />
23. Back trajectories provide useful <strong>in</strong>formation on the orig<strong>in</strong> of an air mass and<br />
have been used to understand better the orig<strong>in</strong>s of <strong>PM2.5</strong> concentrations <strong>in</strong> the<br />
UK. An analysis has been carried out us<strong>in</strong>g HYSPLIT 96-hour back trajectories<br />
calculated for every three hours derived from NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis data<br />
(Draxler and Hess, 1997). The whole of each back trajectory, i.e. one every<br />
three hours, has been assigned the hourly mean <strong>PM2.5</strong> concentration for the<br />
arrival time at the arrival site. The same concentration is therefore associated<br />
with all the 96 hours preced<strong>in</strong>g the arrival time, giv<strong>in</strong>g 96 latitude/longitude<br />
locations along the trajectory with the arrival time concentration. For a large<br />
number of trajectories that cover widely different geographic regions, this<br />
technique provides an <strong>in</strong>dication of the source orig<strong>in</strong> of the pollutant be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
analysed. There are of course uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> these calculations, for example <strong>in</strong><br />
the accuracy of the back trajectory calculations themselves. It must, however,<br />
be borne <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that any elevated concentrations at the arrival site will be<br />
assigned to all po<strong>in</strong>ts along the trajectory, even though the source may have<br />
only contributed at some <strong>in</strong>termediate po<strong>in</strong>t along the trajectory. The analysis<br />
of a large number of trajectories can, nevertheless, provide a good <strong>in</strong>dication of<br />
the geographic locations most strongly associated with elevated concentrations<br />
of <strong>PM2.5</strong>.<br />
24. As an example, Figure 3.12a shows the time series of daily mean <strong>PM2.5</strong><br />
concentrations at the Bexley Slade Green site <strong>in</strong> East London for 2009. It<br />
is apparent from this figure that there are clear periods when the <strong>PM2.5</strong><br />
concentrations are elevated, particularly <strong>in</strong> the first half of the year. The bottom<br />
plot, Figure 3.12b, shows the 96-hour back trajectories month by month at the<br />
Bexley site. The low concentrations <strong>in</strong> June-August tend to be associated with<br />
trajectories from the Atlantic and the north and the absence of trajectories from<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ental Europe. Almost all the high concentration periods are associated<br />
with air mass trajectories from the east, although <strong>in</strong> some cases the pattern<br />
is complex. For example, <strong>in</strong> March 2009 there was a period of 4-5 days when<br />
anticyclonic conditions dom<strong>in</strong>ated to the east of the UK which set up circulatory<br />
air masses from cont<strong>in</strong>ental Europe. Such conditions would ensure that<br />
precursor emissions would have accumulated as air masses passed over areas of<br />
high precursor emission source strength, and this would have been comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
with sufficient time for secondary aerosol to be produced.<br />
25. The trajectory analysis has been extended to seven sites across the UK, as<br />
shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.13 for 2009 (the sites are broadly ordered from north to<br />
south). For clarity, the trajectory po<strong>in</strong>t concentrations have been smoothed<br />
to <strong>in</strong>dicate approximate source orig<strong>in</strong>s, similar to the work of Seibert et<br />
al. (1994) and Stohl (1996). The purpose of Figure 3.13 is to highlight the<br />
approximate spatial orig<strong>in</strong>s that contribute the highest <strong>PM2.5</strong> concentrations<br />
measured at the UK sites. There is consistency across the different sites <strong>in</strong> that<br />
the highest concentrations of <strong>PM2.5</strong> are dom<strong>in</strong>ated by air masses from the east<br />
and south-east. The higher background concentrations seen for the urban<br />
background Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh site <strong>in</strong> comparison with the rural Auchencorth Moss<br />
site will be due to local urban sources elevat<strong>in</strong>g the overall concentrations<br />
measured <strong>in</strong> Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh, irrespective of the trajectory direction. However, it is<br />
clear, for 2009 at least, that the contribution from ma<strong>in</strong>land Europe to high<br />
<strong>PM2.5</strong> concentrations at these northern UK sites is less than for sites further<br />
59