Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>PM2.5</strong> <strong>in</strong> the UK<br />
54<br />
3.4.2 Relationship of <strong>PM2.5</strong> with PM10, NOx and NO2<br />
17. The diurnal pattern for <strong>PM2.5</strong> has been discussed above <strong>in</strong> isolation. The<br />
pattern <strong>in</strong> relation to PM10, nitrogen oxides (NOx) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2)<br />
is exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this section. Figure 3.9 shows the pattern for all four pollutants<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g 2010 at eight urban background sites across the UK where data capture<br />
was > 90% for all four pollutants. The <strong>PM2.5</strong> pattern is similar to that for PM10,<br />
with the latter concentrations be<strong>in</strong>g around 5 µg m -3 higher, although it is<br />
noticeable that the lowest <strong>PM2.5</strong> concentrations occur at around 15.00, while<br />
those for PM10 are around 05.00. The m<strong>in</strong>imum for NOx and NO2 levels is also<br />
around 04.00-05.00. Both <strong>PM2.5</strong> and PM10 show much smaller diurnal variation<br />
than is the case for NOx and NO2. This is consistent with a more limited role for<br />
local emissions <strong>in</strong> the case of <strong>PM2.5</strong> and PM10, and, conversely, a more important<br />
role for regional emissions of <strong>PM2.5</strong> and PM10.<br />
18. NOx patterns will be dom<strong>in</strong>ated by motor vehicle emissions; this is consistent<br />
with the strong peak <strong>in</strong> concentrations dur<strong>in</strong>g the morn<strong>in</strong>g rush hour (around<br />
08.00-09.00) and to a lesser extent dur<strong>in</strong>g the even<strong>in</strong>g rush hour (around<br />
17.00). There is evidence of a contribution of the morn<strong>in</strong>g rush hour to <strong>PM2.5</strong><br />
concentrations, but not the even<strong>in</strong>g rush hour.<br />
19. It is also evident <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.9 that <strong>PM2.5</strong> and PM10 concentrations <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the late even<strong>in</strong>g to a peak around 20.00-21.00, at a time when NOx<br />
and NO2 concentrations are decreas<strong>in</strong>g. Fuller et al. (2011) have suggested<br />
that domestic biomass combustion may result <strong>in</strong> elevated PM concentrations<br />
<strong>in</strong> the late even<strong>in</strong>g and weekends based on their work us<strong>in</strong>g tracers for wood<br />
smoke (levoglucosan). The late even<strong>in</strong>g peak may thus reflect a contribution<br />
from domestic sources, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g both heat<strong>in</strong>g and cook<strong>in</strong>g (Laxen et al., 2010),<br />
although evidence on the diurnal cycle of emissions related to domestic heat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from gas and coal does not support a late even<strong>in</strong>g peak from this source (Jenk<strong>in</strong><br />
et al., 2000). The late even<strong>in</strong>g peak will to some extent reflect the more stable<br />
atmospheric conditions at this time of the day, but this cannot be the ma<strong>in</strong><br />
reason, otherwise NOx emissions would not be decreas<strong>in</strong>g over this period. The<br />
late even<strong>in</strong>g peak may also reflect a contribution from volatile PM condens<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on ambient particles, which is also evident <strong>in</strong> higher night-time nitrate<br />
concentrations (Laxen et al., 2010).