Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Annex 2: PM modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the UK<br />
46. The response of <strong>PM2.5</strong> to 30% reductions <strong>in</strong> SO2 emissions is necessarily the<br />
result of a number of factors and <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g each of the <strong>PM2.5</strong><br />
components. Sulphate levels decrease but the <strong>in</strong>creased availability of NH3 leads<br />
to an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> ammonium nitrate formation and an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the extent<br />
of neutralisation of sulphuric acid (H2SO4). As a consequence, ammonium<br />
decreases by much less than 30%, f<strong>in</strong>e nitrate <strong>in</strong>creases and coarse nitrate<br />
decreases. Hence, <strong>PM2.5</strong> responds less than l<strong>in</strong>early to reductions <strong>in</strong> SO2<br />
emissions, with a sensitivity coefficient of 0.21.<br />
47. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g response of <strong>PM2.5</strong> to 30% reductions <strong>in</strong> NOx emissions is<br />
much less than l<strong>in</strong>ear. <strong>F<strong>in</strong>e</strong> nitrate levels decrease <strong>in</strong> response to NOx emission<br />
reductions but the attendant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> hydroxyl (OH - ) levels reduces the<br />
f<strong>in</strong>e and coarse nitrate responses and also leads to an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sulphate.<br />
Ammonium levels fall somewhat, as a result of decreas<strong>in</strong>g levels of ammonium<br />
nitrate and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g levels of ammonium sulphates. The sensitivity coefficient<br />
of <strong>PM2.5</strong> to NOx emissions was accord<strong>in</strong>gly 0.13.<br />
48. Because the chemical environment of the southern UK was found to be<br />
‘ammonia-limited’, the response of <strong>PM2.5</strong> to 30% reductions <strong>in</strong> NH3 emissions<br />
was not straightforward. <strong>F<strong>in</strong>e</strong> nitrate decl<strong>in</strong>ed exactly l<strong>in</strong>early with the decl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
<strong>in</strong> NH3 emissions because gaseous nitric acid formation was <strong>in</strong>dependent of<br />
ammonia and hence there was a l<strong>in</strong>ear decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> ammonium nitrate formation.<br />
This decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> ammonium nitrate formation drives an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> coarse nitrate<br />
formation. Sulphate levels were left unchanged by reductions <strong>in</strong> ammonia<br />
emissions but significant changes were observed <strong>in</strong> the extent of neutralisation<br />
of H2SO4. Overall, the sensitivity of <strong>PM2.5</strong> to NH3 emissions was found to be 0.30<br />
and was the largest for the SO2, NOx and NH3 PM precursors.<br />
49. The l<strong>in</strong>earity of the chemical production pathways form<strong>in</strong>g secondary PM<br />
components was exam<strong>in</strong>ed by sensitivity studies to 30% reductions <strong>in</strong> SO2,<br />
NOx, NH3, VOC and CO emissions. The chemical environment revealed by<br />
these sensitivity studies appeared to be ‘ammonia-limited’. Consequently, PM<br />
mass concentrations appeared to be markedly non-l<strong>in</strong>ear with PM precursor<br />
emissions. Policy strategies for <strong>PM2.5</strong> therefore need to take <strong>in</strong>to account<br />
emission reductions for a wide range of primary PM components and secondary<br />
PM precursors and to focus primarily on the abatement of NH3. This complex<br />
<strong>in</strong>terl<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g may help to expla<strong>in</strong> why PM levels have rema<strong>in</strong>ed constant despite<br />
fall<strong>in</strong>g primary PM emissions.<br />
50. In summary, Figure A2.6.2 presents the fractional reduction <strong>in</strong> annual mean<br />
<strong>PM2.5</strong> concentrations at Harwell, Oxfordshire, for a given reduction <strong>in</strong> precursor<br />
emissions. That is to say, for an x% reduction <strong>in</strong> precursor emissions, the<br />
reduction <strong>in</strong> ammonia emissions would give the greatest reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>PM2.5</strong><br />
levels out of all the precursor species considered (i.e. NH3, NOx, SO2, VOCs, CO,<br />
EC and OC).<br />
165