05.01.2013 Views

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

µgm -3<br />

µgm -3<br />

µgm -3<br />

µgm -3<br />

TIME SERIES OF DAILY AVERAGE OF <strong>PM2.5</strong> 2003 (HAR)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Red – Observation Blue – Model<br />

0<br />

JAN<br />

2003<br />

FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

JAN<br />

2003<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

JAN<br />

2006<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

JAN<br />

2006<br />

TIME SERIES OF DAILY AVERAGE OF <strong>PM2.5</strong> 2003 (LBB)<br />

FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC<br />

TIME SERIES OF DAILY AVERAGE OF <strong>PM2.5</strong> 2006 (HAR)<br />

FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC<br />

TIME SERIES OF DAILY AVERAGE OF <strong>PM2.5</strong> 2006 (LNK)<br />

FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC<br />

Figure A2.2.1: Time series of 24-hour means of <strong>PM2.5</strong> concentrations for 2003<br />

and 2006 from CMAQ and measurements from Harwell (HAR), London North<br />

Kens<strong>in</strong>gton (LNK) and London Bloomsbury (LBB) stations. Red is observation and<br />

blue is model results.<br />

10. The underestimation of modelled results is observed for both stations <strong>in</strong> the<br />

2006 run. However, the Harwell results shown <strong>in</strong> Table A2.2.1 for 2005 (January<br />

and July) us<strong>in</strong>g the same model configuration, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g meteorological fields<br />

and grid resolution, but with year-specific emissions, <strong>in</strong>dicate closer agreement<br />

with measurements as <strong>in</strong>dicated by the factor of 2 statistical metric (FACT2). A<br />

full year run for 2005 is be<strong>in</strong>g planned and will lead to more <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

model performance. Specifically, it is recommended that sensitivity of <strong>PM2.5</strong><br />

concentration to boundary conditions and the long-term year-to-year variations<br />

over multiple years be <strong>in</strong>vestigated to provide confidence <strong>in</strong> the performance<br />

of models such as CMAQ to address policy issues. Scatter plots are shown for<br />

2006 (Figure A2.2.2) and for January and July 2005 (Figure A2.2.3).<br />

Model<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

<strong>PM2.5</strong> 2006 (HAR)<br />

0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

Observation<br />

Model<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Annex 2: PM modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the UK<br />

<strong>PM2.5</strong> 2006 (LNK)<br />

0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

Observation<br />

Figure A2.2.2: Scatter plots of 24-hour means of <strong>PM2.5</strong> concentrations for Harwell<br />

(HAR) and London North Kens<strong>in</strong>gton (LNK) for 2006. The red dashed l<strong>in</strong>e represents<br />

1:1 l<strong>in</strong>e, the purple dashed l<strong>in</strong>e represents 2:1 l<strong>in</strong>e and the blue dashed l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

represents 1:2 l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!