Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>PM2.5</strong> <strong>in</strong> the UK<br />
178<br />
12. With respect to road traffic emissions, a key future factor is that as reductions <strong>in</strong><br />
exhaust emissions of PM occur as a consequence of European vehicle emission<br />
regulation, non-exhaust components of traffic emissions will become much<br />
more important, emphasis<strong>in</strong>g the need to <strong>in</strong>troduce measures to control their<br />
sources. Emissions from tyre and brake wear, and road abrasion are not well<br />
understood, yet current <strong>in</strong>ventory projections predict that if they cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be<br />
uncontrolled they will be responsible for over 70% of total traffic emissions of<br />
<strong>PM2.5</strong> by 2020.<br />
13. Emissions from fugitive dust sources, small-scale wood and waste burn<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
cook<strong>in</strong>g, agriculture, natural sources and shipp<strong>in</strong>g are also poorly understood<br />
and difficult to quantify yet can make a significant contribution to <strong>PM2.5</strong><br />
concentrations. This needs to be addressed, especially if the benefits of<br />
mitigation are to be assessed.<br />
14. Models are an important tool for the synthesis of knowledge and prediction<br />
of concentrations. Models fulfil an important role <strong>in</strong> answer<strong>in</strong>g questions such<br />
as how will PM levels change <strong>in</strong>to the future, which are the most important<br />
emission sources to control to reach acceptable air <strong>quality</strong> and what balance<br />
should be struck between policy actions with<strong>in</strong> the UK and abroad? PM models<br />
are still develop<strong>in</strong>g and have a number of <strong>in</strong>adequacies and uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties. It<br />
may be that there are ‘surprises’ before we can be sure that they are completely<br />
reliable policy tools. There is a press<strong>in</strong>g requirement to develop and evaluate PM<br />
models <strong>in</strong> the policy context.<br />
15. The science underp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g the knowledge of <strong>PM2.5</strong> is rapidly evolv<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>s uncerta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> many areas. There is a need for rapid translation <strong>in</strong>to the<br />
policy arena of the newest results and understand<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
6.1 <strong>PM2.5</strong> report summary of actions<br />
16. Table 6.2 summarises AQEG’s assessment of the action areas for the current<br />
evidence base, highlight<strong>in</strong>g areas which need most attention to improve<br />
understand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>PM2.5</strong> <strong>in</strong> the UK.<br />
Table 6.2: Action areas for the science and evidence base on <strong>PM2.5</strong>.<br />
Evidence area Urgency Impact/<br />
importance<br />
Measurements<br />
Automatic Urban and Rural Network<br />
(AURN) <strong>PM2.5</strong> measurements<br />
Chemically-speciated <strong>PM2.5</strong><br />
measurements<br />
Concentrations and composition<br />
of <strong>PM2.5</strong><br />
Addresses recommendation(s)<br />
or conclusion<br />
1 H See Chapter 2 (§2.6) and<br />
paras 4-5<br />
1 H See Chapter 3 (§3.10.2) and<br />
para 7<br />
Observational analysis 2 M See Chapter 3 (§3.10.2)<br />
Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of rural background 1 H See Chapter 3 (§3.10.2)<br />
Mitigation analysis 2 M See Chapter 3 (§3.10.2) and para 8