05.01.2013 Views

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>PM2.5</strong> <strong>in</strong> the UK<br />

104<br />

4.5.2 Quantify<strong>in</strong>g the secondary <strong>in</strong>organic contribution<br />

71. It is relatively straightforward to identify the contribution of secondary <strong>in</strong>organic<br />

particles to the <strong>PM2.5</strong> mass <strong>in</strong> the atmosphere. Measurements of the sum<br />

of sulphate and nitrate expressed <strong>in</strong> chemical equivalents are typically very<br />

similar to the concentration of ammonium expressed <strong>in</strong> chemical equivalents,<br />

suggest<strong>in</strong>g that with<strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>e particles these components are chemically<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed as ammonium sulphate and ammonium nitrate, and the comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

sum represents the secondary <strong>in</strong>organic contribution to the <strong>PM2.5</strong> mass.<br />

Occasionally, there may also be a contribution from ammonium chloride formed<br />

from the reaction of hydrogen chloride, typically emitted from coal burn<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration, with ammonia. However, ammonium chloride is semi-volatile (Pio<br />

and Harrison, 1987) and current emissions of hydrogen chloride are frequently<br />

too low to susta<strong>in</strong> an atmospheric concentration sufficient to lead to the<br />

formation of ammonium chloride particles.<br />

4.5.3 Estimation of the secondary organic aerosol contribution<br />

72. Differentiation of primary and secondary organic <strong>matter</strong> <strong>in</strong> particles is<br />

challeng<strong>in</strong>g. The most frequently used method is the elemental carbon tracer<br />

method which assumes that primary organic <strong>matter</strong> exists <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

with elemental carbon and that if the ratio between primary organic carbon<br />

(OC) and elemental carbon (EC) is known, then any organic carbon <strong>in</strong> excess<br />

of this ratio is attributable to secondary organic <strong>matter</strong>. This is a relatively<br />

well accepted concept but estimation of the ratio of OC to EC <strong>in</strong> primary<br />

emissions is difficult. Typically, this is estimated by plott<strong>in</strong>g OC versus EC and<br />

identify<strong>in</strong>g a m<strong>in</strong>imum ratio <strong>in</strong> the data as <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.8. This ratio is assumed<br />

to be representative of time periods when no secondary organic carbon was<br />

present and the extent to which <strong>in</strong>dividual data po<strong>in</strong>ts are above the m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e is used to estimate their secondary organic carbon content. This method<br />

tends to fail <strong>in</strong> rural areas where secondary organic carbon is dom<strong>in</strong>ant and the<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum ratio <strong>in</strong>evitably <strong>in</strong>cludes some secondary organic <strong>matter</strong>. The presence<br />

of wood smoke, which is a primary material with a high OC:EC ratio, can also<br />

cause difficulties <strong>in</strong> disaggregat<strong>in</strong>g the contributions. Recent work by Pio et al.<br />

(2011) exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g data from different locations has <strong>in</strong>dicated that the graphical<br />

method of determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the primary OC:EC ratio frequently overestimates this<br />

ratio and consequently many of the data represent<strong>in</strong>g primary and secondary<br />

organic <strong>matter</strong> <strong>in</strong> the atmosphere may be <strong>in</strong> error. A number of assumptions<br />

have to be made to extract estimates of primary and secondary organic <strong>matter</strong><br />

from radiocarbon measurements but this method has the important attribute<br />

of be<strong>in</strong>g able to dist<strong>in</strong>guish between organic material derived from fossil fuel<br />

sources and that from biogenic sources.<br />

73. A more recent method of estimat<strong>in</strong>g secondary organic particles is through the<br />

application of PMF to data from AMS <strong>in</strong>struments, as described <strong>in</strong> Section 4.5.1<br />

for cook<strong>in</strong>g particles. Typically, the disaggregation of AMS data us<strong>in</strong>g the PMF<br />

programme will identify one or two components enriched <strong>in</strong> ions <strong>in</strong>dicative of<br />

oxidised carbon species, i.e. secondary organic <strong>matter</strong>. These are by convention<br />

referred to as OOA1 and OOA2, where OOA refers to oxidised organic aerosol.<br />

Some studies have shown that one of these components correlates relatively<br />

highly with sulphate and is of low volatility, while the other correlates much<br />

more closely with nitrate and is of appreciably higher volatility. The former is<br />

typically more oxidised than the latter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!