05.01.2013 Views

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

concentration (µg m -3 )<br />

10.0<br />

7.5<br />

5.0<br />

2.5<br />

0.0<br />

POC at N Kens<strong>in</strong>gton<br />

Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08<br />

observed POC modelled POC<br />

Figure A2.3.7: Comparison between observed and CMAQ POC between<br />

August and December 2008 at London North Kens<strong>in</strong>gton.<br />

29. The CMAQ model was able to predict average POC concentrations reasonably<br />

well (Figure A2.3.7), although it failed to predict a number of concentration<br />

peaks. On average the model underpredicts measurements by 0.7 µg m -3 or<br />

37%. However, the CMAQ model fails to predict SOC by a large marg<strong>in</strong>, with<br />

the model and measured averages be<strong>in</strong>g 0.04 and 1.3 µg m -3 respectively (not<br />

shown). Poor results of this k<strong>in</strong>d are reported elsewhere (Zhang and Y<strong>in</strong>g, 2011)<br />

and are the focus of changes to the chemical scheme <strong>in</strong> version 5 of the CMAQ<br />

model.<br />

A2.4: Numerical Atmospheric-dispersion Modell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Environment (NAME)<br />

Annex 2: PM modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the UK<br />

30. NAME is a three-dimensional Lagrangian dispersion model that simulates<br />

dispersion and deposition processes occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the atmosphere and<br />

parameterises the key chemical processes <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> formation of secondary<br />

<strong>in</strong>organic and organic aerosols. Pollutant emissions are represented by releas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

hundreds of thousands of air parcels, each able to represent the released mass<br />

of many different species, driven by three-dimensional meteorological data from<br />

the Met Office’s Unified Model (UM).<br />

31. Recent modell<strong>in</strong>g work (Red<strong>in</strong>gton et al., 2009) has studied the sensitivity of<br />

modelled sulphate and nitrate aerosol to cloud, pH and ammonia emissions.<br />

Sulphate aerosol production <strong>in</strong> the aqueous phase was found to be very<br />

sensitive to modelled cloud pH. As the cloud becomes acidic, sulphate<br />

production is greatly limited, conversely if the cloud is basic, large amounts of<br />

sulphate aerosol are produced. Aqueous phase sulphate aerosol production<br />

was also found to be sensitive to ±30% ammonia emissions due to the effect<br />

of ammonia on the modelled pH. The work highlighted the importance<br />

of ammonia <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g complex l<strong>in</strong>ks between the precursors and<br />

subsequent production of secondary <strong>in</strong>organic aerosol (SIA).<br />

32. The NAME model has been run for 2006 to produce maps of emission<br />

sensitivity coefficients (ESCs) for SIA components over the UK output as a 20<br />

km national grid. The emission sensitivity coefficient is def<strong>in</strong>ed as the change <strong>in</strong><br />

concentration of the PM component divided by the base case PM component<br />

concentration, all divided by the change <strong>in</strong> precursor emission divided by<br />

the base case precursor emission. These emission sensitivities have been<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to the PCM model (A2.8) and used to calculate projections of<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!