05.01.2013 Views

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Organic carbon (µgm -3 )<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.0<br />

2.0<br />

Elemental carbon (µgm -3 )<br />

<strong>PM2.5</strong> emissions and receptor modell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>PM2.5</strong> – BCCS y = 0.65x<br />

0<br />

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0<br />

Figure 4.8: Relationship of organic carbon to elemental carbon <strong>in</strong> the <strong>PM2.5</strong><br />

fraction at the Birm<strong>in</strong>gham City Centre site (BCCS) (urban centre) show<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum ratio l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

4.6 Receptor modell<strong>in</strong>g sources of <strong>PM2.5</strong> <strong>in</strong> the UK<br />

79. Two generic methods of estimat<strong>in</strong>g the contributions of different sources to<br />

concentrations of <strong>particulate</strong> <strong>matter</strong> <strong>in</strong> the atmosphere are available as follows:<br />

(a) Dispersion modell<strong>in</strong>g and chemistry–transport models both start with<br />

spatially-disaggregated emissions <strong>in</strong>ventories, from which concentrations<br />

of unreactive primary pollutants can be estimated by dispersion modell<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Modell<strong>in</strong>g different sources or source types <strong>in</strong>dividually will give an estimate<br />

of the contribution of that source to airborne concentrations. Where<br />

distances of more than a few kilometres from source are <strong>in</strong>volved, models<br />

of atmospheric transport <strong>in</strong> either a Lagrangian or Eulerian framework are<br />

more appropriate than simple dispersion models. For secondary pollutants,<br />

or pollutants that undergo chemical reactions <strong>in</strong> the atmosphere, it is<br />

necessary to use chemistry–transport models which comb<strong>in</strong>e dispersion and<br />

advection of pollutants with chemistry and deposition schemes, allow<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

estimate of concentration as a function of location and altitude.<br />

(b) Receptor modell<strong>in</strong>g methods use measured atmospheric concentrations<br />

of chemically-speciated particles to <strong>in</strong>fer the sources responsible for their<br />

emission or the pathways of formation of secondary pollutants. There are<br />

essentially two ma<strong>in</strong> types of receptor models, those based on multivariate<br />

statistical methods and those us<strong>in</strong>g a chemical mass balance approach<br />

(described <strong>in</strong> more detail <strong>in</strong> Section 4.5 above).<br />

80. The Pollution Climate Mapp<strong>in</strong>g (PCM) model used extensively <strong>in</strong> the UK to <strong>in</strong>form<br />

policy is a hybrid of the two approaches. It uses measured airborne concentration<br />

data as the basis for estimat<strong>in</strong>g concentrations and source contributions for certa<strong>in</strong><br />

types of particles, and also dispersion modell<strong>in</strong>g to estimate the contributions from<br />

primary sources. It is described <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> Chapter 5.<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!