Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Organic carbon (µgm -3 )<br />
12.0<br />
10.0<br />
8.0<br />
6.0<br />
4.0<br />
2.0<br />
Elemental carbon (µgm -3 )<br />
<strong>PM2.5</strong> emissions and receptor modell<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>PM2.5</strong> – BCCS y = 0.65x<br />
0<br />
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0<br />
Figure 4.8: Relationship of organic carbon to elemental carbon <strong>in</strong> the <strong>PM2.5</strong><br />
fraction at the Birm<strong>in</strong>gham City Centre site (BCCS) (urban centre) show<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imum ratio l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
4.6 Receptor modell<strong>in</strong>g sources of <strong>PM2.5</strong> <strong>in</strong> the UK<br />
79. Two generic methods of estimat<strong>in</strong>g the contributions of different sources to<br />
concentrations of <strong>particulate</strong> <strong>matter</strong> <strong>in</strong> the atmosphere are available as follows:<br />
(a) Dispersion modell<strong>in</strong>g and chemistry–transport models both start with<br />
spatially-disaggregated emissions <strong>in</strong>ventories, from which concentrations<br />
of unreactive primary pollutants can be estimated by dispersion modell<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Modell<strong>in</strong>g different sources or source types <strong>in</strong>dividually will give an estimate<br />
of the contribution of that source to airborne concentrations. Where<br />
distances of more than a few kilometres from source are <strong>in</strong>volved, models<br />
of atmospheric transport <strong>in</strong> either a Lagrangian or Eulerian framework are<br />
more appropriate than simple dispersion models. For secondary pollutants,<br />
or pollutants that undergo chemical reactions <strong>in</strong> the atmosphere, it is<br />
necessary to use chemistry–transport models which comb<strong>in</strong>e dispersion and<br />
advection of pollutants with chemistry and deposition schemes, allow<strong>in</strong>g an<br />
estimate of concentration as a function of location and altitude.<br />
(b) Receptor modell<strong>in</strong>g methods use measured atmospheric concentrations<br />
of chemically-speciated particles to <strong>in</strong>fer the sources responsible for their<br />
emission or the pathways of formation of secondary pollutants. There are<br />
essentially two ma<strong>in</strong> types of receptor models, those based on multivariate<br />
statistical methods and those us<strong>in</strong>g a chemical mass balance approach<br />
(described <strong>in</strong> more detail <strong>in</strong> Section 4.5 above).<br />
80. The Pollution Climate Mapp<strong>in</strong>g (PCM) model used extensively <strong>in</strong> the UK to <strong>in</strong>form<br />
policy is a hybrid of the two approaches. It uses measured airborne concentration<br />
data as the basis for estimat<strong>in</strong>g concentrations and source contributions for certa<strong>in</strong><br />
types of particles, and also dispersion modell<strong>in</strong>g to estimate the contributions from<br />
primary sources. It is described <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> Chapter 5.<br />
107