05.01.2013 Views

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>PM2.5</strong> emissions and receptor modell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

brake wear) and nickel and vanadium (fuel oil combustion). Considerable care is<br />

required <strong>in</strong> their use as other sources may contribute <strong>in</strong> some localities.<br />

69. One of the few sources which is typically quantified from a s<strong>in</strong>gle component<br />

is biomass burn<strong>in</strong>g, which <strong>in</strong> the UK would typically refer to wood burn<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

bonfires, although occasionally woodland and forest fires would also contribute.<br />

The carbohydrate compound levoglucosan is typically used as a s<strong>in</strong>gle marker<br />

of biomass burn<strong>in</strong>g as this is by far its major atmospheric source. Consequently,<br />

there is little risk of contributions from other sources but there rema<strong>in</strong>s the<br />

problem of convert<strong>in</strong>g the mass of levoglucosan <strong>in</strong>to a mass of wood smoke<br />

particles. While many measurements exist of the ratio of wood smoke particles<br />

to levoglucosan mass, the ratio is highly variable depend<strong>in</strong>g on combustion<br />

conditions. Consequently, when us<strong>in</strong>g levoglucosan as an atmospheric tracer,<br />

there are large uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> the subsequent conversion to a wood smoke<br />

mass. Other tracers of wood smoke <strong>in</strong>clude f<strong>in</strong>e particle potassium (after<br />

correction for a contribution from w<strong>in</strong>d-blown soil and sea salt), but a similar<br />

problem rema<strong>in</strong>s, namely that the wood smoke to f<strong>in</strong>e potassium mass ratio is<br />

highly dependent upon combustion conditions and there is no unique factor<br />

for the conversion as it relates to the atmosphere. It is also possible to use an<br />

aethalometer to estimate wood smoke mass but the method (Sandradewi<br />

et al., 2008) was developed <strong>in</strong> a Swiss valley where there are only two sources<br />

of carbonaceous particles, road traffic and wood smoke. In situations such as<br />

the UK where there may well be other sources of carbonaceous particles, the<br />

two component model on which the calculation is based is unreliable; as yet<br />

there is no agreed way of us<strong>in</strong>g the aethalometer to calculate wood smoke<br />

mass <strong>in</strong> the UK. Perhaps the most reliable way of estimat<strong>in</strong>g wood smoke<br />

mass is from the analysis of radiocarbon ( 14 C). Radiocarbon is associated with<br />

contemporary sources of carbon and not with fossil sources. Consequently,<br />

if contemporary elemental carbon is found <strong>in</strong> the atmosphere, it most likely<br />

arises from the combustion of biomass. Consequently, it is a fairly reliable tracer<br />

of wood smoke but there aga<strong>in</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>s a question over conversion of the<br />

elemental carbon mass to the mass of wood smoke particles, once aga<strong>in</strong> this is<br />

heavily dependent upon combustion conditions.<br />

70. One of the other problem areas <strong>in</strong> source attribution relates to cook<strong>in</strong>g aerosol.<br />

Early work from the United States used cholesterol as a marker of meat cook<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and this was used by Y<strong>in</strong> et al. (2010) <strong>in</strong> their UK study, but the airborne<br />

concentrations were extremely low and no mass concentration was assigned to<br />

particles from meat cook<strong>in</strong>g. However, Allan et al. (2010) used a variant on the<br />

multivariate statistical receptor modell<strong>in</strong>g techniques to identify a contribution<br />

from cook<strong>in</strong>g particles <strong>in</strong> the atmosphere of London. They applied PMF to<br />

mass spectral <strong>in</strong>formation obta<strong>in</strong>ed from non-refractory atmospheric particles<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g an aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS). The AMS volatilises particles before<br />

measur<strong>in</strong>g their mass spectrum, and PMF is able to decompose the overall mass<br />

spectrum <strong>in</strong>to the <strong>in</strong>dividual mass spectra of specific contributory particle types.<br />

Allan et al. (2010) found a particle type whose mass spectrum did not fit that of<br />

the conventional sources (road traffic and coal burn<strong>in</strong>g) but was similar to that<br />

of particles generated from hot corn oil. As a result, they assigned 34% of the<br />

primary organic particles <strong>in</strong> their sample to cook<strong>in</strong>g, but this f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g has yet to<br />

be replicated by other techniques.<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!