Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 2<br />
Measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>PM2.5</strong> and its components<br />
2.1 Introduction<br />
1. Most measurements of <strong>PM2.5</strong> are made to check compliance with air <strong>quality</strong><br />
legislation. Measurement data are also critical for understand<strong>in</strong>g the chemical<br />
and physical processes that affect <strong>particulate</strong> <strong>matter</strong> (PM), and so they also<br />
support the development of models, and decisions about measures to reduce<br />
PM concentrations. This chapter discusses the measurement techniques for<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>PM2.5</strong> and components of <strong>PM2.5</strong> that are referred to <strong>in</strong> this report,<br />
and highlights the difficulties of obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g reliable measurements. Data <strong>quality</strong><br />
issues are also discussed. Techniques such as aerosol mass spectrometry, which<br />
provide valuable <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> other contexts, are not described because they<br />
do not provide data used <strong>in</strong> this report.<br />
2. <strong>PM2.5</strong>, along with PM10, is unusual among regulated air <strong>quality</strong> metrics <strong>in</strong><br />
be<strong>in</strong>g effectively def<strong>in</strong>ed by the measurement method rather than as some<br />
unambiguous chemical or physical component of the air. This was not the<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>tention, and it is, to a large extent, the consequence of the metric<br />
featur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> legislation before a good scientific understand<strong>in</strong>g of airborne<br />
particles was available. As a better understand<strong>in</strong>g has emerged, it has proved<br />
difficult to modify the def<strong>in</strong>ition of <strong>PM2.5</strong> (or PM10) accord<strong>in</strong>gly, because of the<br />
implications for the legislation.<br />
2.1.1 Challenges with <strong>PM2.5</strong> measurement<br />
Measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>PM2.5</strong> and its components<br />
3. In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, <strong>PM2.5</strong> is the mass concentration of airborne particles with an<br />
aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 µm, expressed <strong>in</strong> µg m -3 , where the<br />
volume of air is its volume at ambient conditions (rather than at standardised<br />
temperature and pressure). The size of 2.5 µm was chosen because of its<br />
significance for the penetration of human lungs, set out by the high risk<br />
respirable convention <strong>in</strong> the document ISO 7708:1983, <strong>Air</strong> <strong>quality</strong> – Particle<br />
size fraction def<strong>in</strong>itions for health-related sampl<strong>in</strong>g. For comparison, PM10<br />
corresponds to the thoracic convention <strong>in</strong> the same document, i.e. the size of<br />
<strong>in</strong>haled particles that penetrate beyond the larynx.<br />
4. There is a long history of particle mass concentration measurements based on<br />
the removal of unwanted large particles (<strong>in</strong> this case > 2.5 µm) us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
size-selective <strong>in</strong>let such as an impactor, followed by the weigh<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />
particles that rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the airstream. This is done by pass<strong>in</strong>g the airstream<br />
through a particle filter that is weighed before and after sampl<strong>in</strong>g. The key<br />
measurement issue is that the process of collect<strong>in</strong>g particles onto a filter prior<br />
to mass determ<strong>in</strong>ation can lead to significantly different results depend<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
the partial or total loss of semi-volatile particles (i.e. those that may evaporate<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g collection), and because variable amounts of water can rema<strong>in</strong> bound to<br />
the particles.<br />
19