05.01.2013 Views

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

Air quality expert group - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ... - Defra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2<br />

Measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>PM2.5</strong> and its components<br />

2.1 Introduction<br />

1. Most measurements of <strong>PM2.5</strong> are made to check compliance with air <strong>quality</strong><br />

legislation. Measurement data are also critical for understand<strong>in</strong>g the chemical<br />

and physical processes that affect <strong>particulate</strong> <strong>matter</strong> (PM), and so they also<br />

support the development of models, and decisions about measures to reduce<br />

PM concentrations. This chapter discusses the measurement techniques for<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>PM2.5</strong> and components of <strong>PM2.5</strong> that are referred to <strong>in</strong> this report,<br />

and highlights the difficulties of obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g reliable measurements. Data <strong>quality</strong><br />

issues are also discussed. Techniques such as aerosol mass spectrometry, which<br />

provide valuable <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> other contexts, are not described because they<br />

do not provide data used <strong>in</strong> this report.<br />

2. <strong>PM2.5</strong>, along with PM10, is unusual among regulated air <strong>quality</strong> metrics <strong>in</strong><br />

be<strong>in</strong>g effectively def<strong>in</strong>ed by the measurement method rather than as some<br />

unambiguous chemical or physical component of the air. This was not the<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>tention, and it is, to a large extent, the consequence of the metric<br />

featur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> legislation before a good scientific understand<strong>in</strong>g of airborne<br />

particles was available. As a better understand<strong>in</strong>g has emerged, it has proved<br />

difficult to modify the def<strong>in</strong>ition of <strong>PM2.5</strong> (or PM10) accord<strong>in</strong>gly, because of the<br />

implications for the legislation.<br />

2.1.1 Challenges with <strong>PM2.5</strong> measurement<br />

Measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>PM2.5</strong> and its components<br />

3. In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, <strong>PM2.5</strong> is the mass concentration of airborne particles with an<br />

aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 µm, expressed <strong>in</strong> µg m -3 , where the<br />

volume of air is its volume at ambient conditions (rather than at standardised<br />

temperature and pressure). The size of 2.5 µm was chosen because of its<br />

significance for the penetration of human lungs, set out by the high risk<br />

respirable convention <strong>in</strong> the document ISO 7708:1983, <strong>Air</strong> <strong>quality</strong> – Particle<br />

size fraction def<strong>in</strong>itions for health-related sampl<strong>in</strong>g. For comparison, PM10<br />

corresponds to the thoracic convention <strong>in</strong> the same document, i.e. the size of<br />

<strong>in</strong>haled particles that penetrate beyond the larynx.<br />

4. There is a long history of particle mass concentration measurements based on<br />

the removal of unwanted large particles (<strong>in</strong> this case > 2.5 µm) us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

size-selective <strong>in</strong>let such as an impactor, followed by the weigh<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

particles that rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the airstream. This is done by pass<strong>in</strong>g the airstream<br />

through a particle filter that is weighed before and after sampl<strong>in</strong>g. The key<br />

measurement issue is that the process of collect<strong>in</strong>g particles onto a filter prior<br />

to mass determ<strong>in</strong>ation can lead to significantly different results depend<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

the partial or total loss of semi-volatile particles (i.e. those that may evaporate<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g collection), and because variable amounts of water can rema<strong>in</strong> bound to<br />

the particles.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!