1 miramar beach resort and bungalows project 2 - Santa Barbara ...

1 incorrect on that, but I know I read something akin to
2 that.
3 I'm having trouble making sure -- I want to
4 make sure the allegation for preferential treatment are
5 not validated by what's been done here in establishing
6 the 45 acre feet.
7 MR. MOSBY: Commissioner, that's a good
8 point. There is a three-year allocation period that
9 goes from '03/'04 to '05/'06. That's what we are using
10 with our current commercial classifications and our
11 institutional public classifications.
12 The Miramar, of course, shut down in 1999.
13 So we don't have that window to look at what their use
14 will be. So therefore, we have to go -- there's a point
15 in that we adopted Ordinance 89 specifically directed
16 actually towards projects like the Miramar. We look at
17 the actual usage of a comparable facility. We look at
18 how we can apply conservation. We look at my different
19 variables.
20 So you can't use the base allotment that was
21 established in Ordinance 89, or that's established in
22 part of our new proposal, and that's to the community as
23 far as our rates and structures.
24 So we looked at usage. We looked at usage
25 for a comparable site. We looked at the acre size and
100