1 miramar beach resort and bungalows project 2 - Santa Barbara ...

1 MS. BLACK: That's clear. Did the Schrager
2 approval consider the development they proposed inside
3 of the railroad easement and any use of the beach? The
4 answer is yes. So yes, they did consider it. There's a
5 road crossing it. There was landscaping in the railroad
6 easement.
7 MS. GOTTSDANKER: But they did not count it
8 as part of the FAR calculations?
9 MS. BLACK: They did not count it as part of
10 their base parcel for FAR calculation. They did analyze
11 the effects of the use of those parcels in conjunction
12 with the hotel. So I think you were asking both those
13 questions.
14 MS. GOTTSDANKER: I was asking both those
15 questions. Thank you. And I just -- I'll wait until
16 later to say that.
17 MR. BIERIG: Commissioner Burrows.
18 MS. BURROWS: Before we leave the issue of
19 Parcel 6, of counsel I have a question. Would it be
20 correct to say that the methodolgy used by the surveyor
21 and by Penfield & Smith that is here today that resulted
22 in the 2.02 number -- is that a legally accepted
23 calculation -- methodolgy, I suppose?
24 MS. SLUTZKY: Mr. Chair,
25 Commissioner Burrows, yes, that's the methodolgy used by
229