1 miramar beach resort and bungalows project 2 - Santa Barbara ...

1 here might have some unintended impacts even though
2 you've designed it as a mitigation measure, and that
3 would be the risk.
4 MR. BIERIG: Right. But otherwise, it's not
5 a risk and that the conclusion reached is supported a
6 different -- in that the document supported a different
7 conclusion it's not a problem as long -- as you said,
8 because the conclusion is more restrictive not less
9 restrictive.
10 MR. GHIZZONI: Chairman, again, as long the
11 environmental document provides a basis for your
12 decision for either of the conditions or mitigation
13 measures, that's correct.
14 MR. BIERIG: Okay. Good.
15 Commissioner Overall.
16 MR. OVERALL: Following on the same point,
17 I'm referring to a document Mr. Yates wrote in response
18 to that questions I posed to him. I believe all
19 Commissioners received a copy of it from Ms. Black.
20 His first response -- the question was
21 basically can the Montecito Planning Commission disagree
22 with conclusions in a CEQA document and still approve or
23 certify it, and his response was no. He goes on in --
24 do you have this document?
25 MR. GHIZZONI: Commissioner, yes, I do.
332