03.04.2013 Views

SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov

SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov

SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts from the Judean Desert 121<br />

your son, teach him from a corrected copy (hgwm rps).’ These precise scrolls were corrected<br />

according to a central text found in the temple court and then used anywhere in ancient Israel. In<br />

any event, it is remarkable that the large size of these margins conforms more or less with the<br />

instructions in rabbinic literature (§ e above). This fact is rather important for the argument that<br />

these scrolls belong to the inner circle of proto-rabbinic scrolls. 168<br />

d. As a rule, de luxe scrolls are characterized by their low level of scribal intervention, as may<br />

be expected among predominantly carefully written manuscripts, since the fewer mistakes that<br />

are made, the fewer the corrections needed. However, scribal intervention pertains not only to the<br />

correction of mistakes, but also to the insertion of scribal changes in the text. We measure this<br />

scribal intervention by referring to the average number of lines between two instances of scribal<br />

intervention (supralinear corrections, deletions, erasures, reshaping of letters, linear and<br />

supralinear scribal signs), listed in the last column of the table. The lower the number, the higher<br />

the rate of scribal intervention. This number merely provides an indication of the extent of scribal<br />

intervention since partially surviving lines are counted as being complete (for the full data, see<br />

APPENDIX 1). Much scribal intervention is evidenced, for example, in a scroll such as 1QIsa a that<br />

is far from being a de luxe edition (with an average of one correction in every four lines) and is<br />

therefore not included in TABLE 27. One correction per twenty or more lines should probably be<br />

considered a low degree of scribal correction, but most scrolls in the table have (far) fewer<br />

corrections: 4QGen b , 4QpaleoGen-Exod l, 4QpaleoExod m , XH≥ev/SeNum b, 4QDeut g , 4QJer c ,<br />

4QEzek a , MurXII, MasPs a . For a fuller analysis of scribal intervention in these and other texts,<br />

see ch. 7a. A relatively high level of scribal intervention is evidenced in 4QExod c and 4QDeut k1 .<br />

Other proto-Masoretic scrolls from Qumran which were not written in de luxe format sometimes<br />

also reflect little scribal intervention, while scrolls beyond the Masoretic family display more<br />

such activity.<br />

The implication of this analysis is that we should posit a group of de luxe Bible editions,<br />

especially among the later scrolls, characterized by large top and bottom margins, a large number<br />

of lines, a high degree of proximity to or even identity with MT, and a low incidence of scribal<br />

intervention. In fact, all the scrolls from Nah≥al H≥ever, Murabba>at, and Masada, for which the<br />

margins are known, 169 are of this type, while MasLev a (2.8 cm), MasLev b (2.7 cm), and<br />

5/6H≥evPs (2.5–2.7 cm) come very close. At the same time, some de luxe editions are of a<br />

different textual nature, as is shown by 4QpaleoExod m and 4QSam a .<br />

Other scrolls of large or very large vertical dimensions (tall scrolls of 28 lines or more) listed<br />

in TABLE 28 had no exceptionally wide margins, but usually they are larger than average, and often<br />

approach 3.0 cm, which has been used as the cut-off measure for TABLE 27. For further details on<br />

these texts, see TABLE 15. Some of these texts may also have been intended as de luxe editions.<br />

TABLE 28: Hebrew/Aramaic Scrolls of Large Dimensions That May Have Been de Luxe Editions<br />

Name No. of Lines Height (cm) Top/Bottom Margins (cm)<br />

4QEn b ar (4Q202) 28, 29 30 —<br />

4QInstr d (4Q418) c. 29 — —<br />

1QSa 29 23.5 1.2–1.7 and 1.7+<br />

4QPs q 29 23.6 top 2.0<br />

MurIsa 29 19.5 bottom 2.7+<br />

4QEn c ar (4Q204) 30 24 bottom 2.3<br />

168 The argument is developed in my study “The Text of the Hebrew/Aramaic and Greek Bible Used in the Ancient<br />

Synagogues,” in The Ancient Synagogue: From the Beginning to about 200 CE. Papers Presented at the International<br />

Conference Held at Lund University Oct. 14–17, 2001 (ed. B. Olsson and M. Zetterholm; ConBNT 39; Stockholm<br />

2003) 239–62.<br />

169 All the biblical scrolls found at these sites attest to the medieval text of MT.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!