SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov
SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov
SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
74 Chapter 4: Technical Aspects of Scroll Writing<br />
Contents of Qumran scrolls. The length of scrolls is closely connected to that of their<br />
contents. Scripture scrolls feature frequently in the list of long scrolls, and statistically they form<br />
the majority among the longer Qumran scrolls. However, these statistics are misleading since the<br />
contents of Scripture scrolls are known, and therefore scholars have indulged in more speculation<br />
regarding their length than for other scrolls.<br />
To the best of our knowledge, each Qumran scroll contained only a single literary<br />
composition, and very few scrolls are known that contain a compilation of different literary<br />
works on one side of the writing surface; for possible examples, see the list in the beginning of ch.<br />
3d. When scrolls were inscribed on both sides (opisthographs), often different compositions were<br />
inscribed on the two sides of the leather or papyrus (§ b above).<br />
If two or more biblical books were contained in a single scroll, these books were part of a<br />
larger unit. However, evidence for scrolls containing such a larger unit is scanty (TABLE 10), while<br />
there is evidence for single books within those larger units that were demonstrably not part of<br />
such larger units. Of course, scrolls starting with Genesis (4QGen b,g,k ), Joshua (XJosh), Kings<br />
(5QKgs), Isaiah (1QIsa a and MurIsa), or the Minor Prophets (4QXII d ), preceded by a handle<br />
sheet or a large uninscribed area should cause no surprise. Nor should it be surprising that<br />
MasDeut, MasPs b , and 11QPs a ended with a final handle sheet or an uninscribed area. At the<br />
same time, there is some evidence for scrolls which contain a single biblical book and are not part<br />
of a larger unit:<br />
• 11QpaleoLev a , ending with a ruled uninscribed area of 15.6 cm—covering a complete column—as well as<br />
with a separate handle sheet, was not followed by Numbers.<br />
• 4QLev c and 4QDeut h , both beginning at the top of a column, probably started a new scroll, although they also<br />
could have followed the previous biblical books, which ended somewhere on the previous column.<br />
• 6QDeut? (6Q20), starting with an initial uninscribed area of 5.0+ cm, was not part of a larger scroll of the<br />
Torah.<br />
• 1QIsa a , not followed by an additional book (no sheet was stitched unto it), formed a single scroll probably<br />
preceded by an uninscribed handle page.<br />
• Most extant Qumran copies of the Five Scrolls were probably contained in separate scrolls (note their small<br />
dimensions recorded in TABLE 18; see also the analysis there).<br />
There is no evidence that large compositions found in the Judean Desert were written on more<br />
than one scroll, with the exception of the books of the Torah. 1QIsa a was written by two scribes<br />
(ch. 2e and TABLE 1 there), but the sheets written by these scribes were sewn together. Hence,<br />
the custom to subdivide large compositions into different scrolls (bisection) may derive from<br />
either different circles or later (earlier?) times. Thus, while 4QSam a contains the text of both 1 and<br />
2 Samuel, later manuscripts divided the book into two segments.<br />
It is difficult to date the bisection of 2 Samuel, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel in the LXX scrolls, but it could have<br />
occurred around the turn of the era (E. <strong>Tov</strong>, The Septuagint Translation of Jeremiah and Baruch: A Discussion of<br />
an Early Revision of Jeremiah 29–52 and Baruch 1:1–3:8 [HSM 8; Missoula, Mont. 1976] 161 ff.). Also in the<br />
classical world, large compositions were subdivided into independent units (scrolls), often regardless of their<br />
content. See Birt, Buchwesen, 131–40; Hall, Companion, 7–8; F. G. Kenyon, “Book Divisions in Greek and Latin<br />
Literature,” in William Warner Bishop: A Tribute (ed. H. M. Lydenberg and A. Keogh; New Haven 1941) 63–76<br />
(especially 73–4); idem, Books and Readers, 64–70; J. van Sickle, “The Book-Roll and Some Conventions of the<br />
Poetic Books,” Arethusa 13 (1980) 5–42; Gamble, Books and Readers, 42–66.<br />
d. Dimensions of Sheets<br />
At Qumran, the length of most sheets of leather varied between 21 and 90 cm. The natural<br />
limitations of the sizes of animal hides determined the different lengths of these sheets within<br />
each scroll, which varied more in some scrolls than in others. In two instances (MurXII,<br />
11QpaleoLev a ), the preserved sheets are more or less of the same length. Some examples of the<br />
sheet sizes in well-preserved scrolls are listed in TABLE 13 in ascending order of size. 4QCal