SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov
SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov
SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
156 Chapter 5: Writing Practices<br />
While many of the poetry texts in the Bible are written as running texts in the medieval copies of<br />
MT, medieval manuscripts presented the t"ma books (Job, Proverbs, and Psalms), some songs of<br />
the Torah, the song of Deborah, and the acrostic in Lamentations, as poetry. The manuscripts<br />
differ among themselves with regard to the systems of presenting the text, and these differences<br />
were multiplied in modern editions. Thus the editions of Letteris (in most of its printings) and<br />
Cassuto present the t"ma books as poetry, while several of the printings of the Letteris edition<br />
present only the book of Psalms as poetry. The layouts of the poems in the medieval<br />
manuscripts and printed editions, as well as their relationship to statements in rabbinic literature,<br />
were analyzed in detail by M. Breuer, The Aleppo Codex and the Accepted Text of the Bible (Heb.<br />
with Eng. summ.; Jerusalem 1976) 149–89.<br />
These traditions as well as additional systems of layout of poetical segments were reflected<br />
already in some texts from the Judean Desert, while other ancient texts containing poetical<br />
segments were written in prose. The practice of a stichographic 209 representation was developed<br />
for the books written in a system of strict parallelismus membrorum, which therefore could<br />
easily be represented stichographically. This pertains also to most Songs in the Torah. Other<br />
poetical books, such as the Major Prophets, likewise reflect such parallelismus, but not in all<br />
chapters, and probably for this reason no stichographic writing tradition has been developed for<br />
them. As a result, most poetical books are not represented in stichographic writing.<br />
The stichographic arrangements of poetical texts reflect a certain understanding by their<br />
scribes of the poetical structure, while it is unclear to what extent these layouts reflect the original<br />
intention of the poets behind the texts. Only in a few instances, and probably at a later period, 210<br />
do these stichographic layouts merely serve a decorative purpose.<br />
The background of the stichographic presentation of some poetical texts is unclear. The<br />
special writing of Psalms as poetry could have been related to liturgical chanting, but on the other<br />
hand a Psalms scroll such as 11QPs a which probably does represent a liturgical collection is not<br />
written in this fashion. Furthermore, the stichographic representation of Job, Proverbs,<br />
Lamentations, and Ben Sira is not consonant with a possible liturgical background (thus also<br />
Oesch, Petucha und Setuma, 334). Therefore, the stichographic representation of specific texts<br />
probably mainly reflects a recognition of the poetical nature of these units. The fact that for<br />
almost every occurrence of a stichographic arrangement there are other scrolls displaying the same<br />
composition in prose shows that the tradition of stichographic writing was not fixed or that<br />
different traditions were in vogue during different periods (see below).<br />
In the Judean Desert texts, a special arrangement of poetical units is known almost<br />
exclusively for biblical texts (including Ben Sira [2QSir and MasSir]), but not for any of the<br />
nonbiblical poetical compositions from the Judean Desert, such as 4QNon-Canonical Psalms A,<br />
B (4Q380, 4Q381), the Hodayot from caves 1 (1QH a,b ) and 4 (4QH a–f ), 4QBarkhi Nafshi a–e ,<br />
4QShirShabb a–f , 4QSelf-Glorification Hymn (4Q471b; 4QM a [4Q491] 11 [4Q491c]), and the<br />
various sapiential compositions (mainly 4Q415–426). 211 The fact that the song in Exodus 15 in<br />
4QRP c (4Q365) 6a ii and 6c, a ‘rewritten Bible’ composition, is written in a special layout may<br />
209 The term is used in the discussion by J. Kugel, The Idea of Biblical Poetry: Parallelism and its History (New<br />
Haven/London 1981) 119–27.<br />
210 Reference is made to the Samaritan scribal habits and the Masoretic system of writing a ‘half-brick over a whole brick<br />
and a whole brick over a half-brick’ to be mentioned below. For a different view, stressing the decorative function of<br />
stichographic writing also for the Qumran documents, see Kugel, The Idea of Biblical Poetry, 121.<br />
211 The layout of 1Q38 is unclear: the editors of this ‘composition hymnique,’ D. Barthélemy and J. T. Milik, presented this<br />
fragmentary text as reflecting two columns of hemistichs of a stichographically arranged text, separated by spaces.<br />
However, the spaces are large, and it is more likely that the fragment presents remnants of two columns of an otherwise<br />
unknown text. Furthermore, our list does not include 4QBeatitudes (4Q525) col. II which appears to be written in a<br />
stichographic arrangement, but the scribe of this text left irregular spaces in the lines, at different places, after each yrça<br />
statement.