03.04.2013 Views

SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov

SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov

SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

250 Chapter 8: Scribal Traditions<br />

s. Ruling with ink<br />

t. Final handle sheets<br />

a. Paragraphos signs (figs. 1.2–1.7 1.2 1.7 and 11.2,6) 11.2<br />

The paragraphos and similar paragraphing devices usually occur in conjunction with a system of<br />

notation of open or closed sections. The majority of the Qumran texts listed in ch. 5c1 as<br />

containing such signs (thirty-three) are Hebrew texts written according to the Qumran scribal<br />

practice (twenty-two). In addition, these signs occur in three biblical texts, three Aramaic texts,<br />

and five texts that were either not copied by the Qumran group of scribes, or whose character is<br />

unclear. The data are also tabulated in APPENDIX 1.<br />

The fact that the majority of the texts containing paragraphos signs were written in the<br />

Qumran orthography and morphology forms a convincing link between this scribal practice and<br />

the Qumran community, especially since most of these texts also contain a sectarian content. The<br />

exact number of occurrences of these signs in the Qumran sectarian scrolls cannot be determined<br />

due to their fragmentary state of preservation. It is, however, clear that their use was probably<br />

limited to certain scribes, users, or periods since less than half of the sectarian texts display these<br />

signs.<br />

b. Cancellation dots (figs. 6.1–6.4 6.1 6.4)<br />

The practice of using cancellation dots is evidenced in fifty-two biblical and nonbiblical texts<br />

written in the Qumran scribal practice, eight texts not written in that system, six texts of unclear<br />

orthographic practice, and three Aramaic texts (ch. 5c2). Since only half of the Qumran texts large<br />

enough for analysis reflect the features of the Qumran scribal practice, and the majority of the<br />

texts using the scribal dots are written in the Qumran orthography and morphology, the use of<br />

cancellation dots may be considered characteristic of that scribal practice. Since cancellation dots<br />

are used only in half of the texts written in the Qumran scribal practice, the use of this practice<br />

was probably limited to certain scribes or periods.<br />

g. Crossing out of letters and words with a line (fig. 7)<br />

Words or letters were crossed out in thirteen biblical and nonbiblical texts written in the Qumran<br />

scribal practice, seven texts not written in that system, and three Aramaic texts. See ch. 5c2 and<br />

TABLE 16. Since this scribal practice is used only in a small number of sectarian texts, it was<br />

probably limited to certain scribes, users, or periods.<br />

d. Parenthesis signs (figs. 8.1–3) 8.1<br />

Parenthesis signs were used in five texts written in the Qumran scribal practice and three texts not<br />

written in that system for indicating omissions and, in one instance, an addition. See ch. 5c2.<br />

e. Writing of the divine names with paleo-Hebrew characters (figs. 26, 26 27) 27<br />

Of the twenty-eight manuscripts using paleo-Hebrew characters for the divine names in the<br />

middle of a text written in square characters, nineteen or twenty (if 1QPs b is included) are<br />

nonbiblical; six or seven (if 1QPs b is included) are biblical manuscripts; one is probably a<br />

rewritten Bible manuscript (2QExod b ); the nature of 3Q14 is unclear. All texts in this group that<br />

are large enough for analysis, with the exception of 4QS d (4Q258), reflect the orthography and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!