03.04.2013 Views

SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov

SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov

SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts from the Judean Desert 33<br />

the hairy side of the skin’ (cf. Massekhet Sefer Torah 1.4). On the other hand, the very thin scroll<br />

11QTa (11Q19), of the kelaph type, was inscribed on the inside of the skin (the flesh side).<br />

It stands to reason that the approximate length of the composition was calculated before the<br />

writing was commenced; with this information, the required number of sheets could be ordered<br />

from a manufacturer or prepared to fit the size of the composition. Subsequently, the individual<br />

sheets were ruled and inscribed and only afterwards stitched together. The fact that some ruled<br />

sheets were used as uninscribed handle sheets (e.g. the final sheets of 11QTa and 11QShirShabb<br />

[ch. 4g]) and that some uninscribed top margins were ruled (the second sheet of 1QpHab [see<br />

below]) shows that the ruling was executed as part of a separate process from the writing. The<br />

numbering of a few sheets (ch. 5c8) probably indicates that they were inscribed individually, to<br />

be joined subsequently based on the numerical sequence (however, the great majority of the<br />

sheets were not numbered). On the other hand, some sheets must have been joined before being<br />

inscribed (§ c below).<br />

A further indication of the separate preparation of the individual sheets is the different nature<br />

of the two surviving sheets of 1QpHab. The first sheet (cols. I–VII) contained regular top<br />

margins of 2.0–3.0 cm, while the top margins of the second sheet (VIII–XIII) measuring 1.6–2.0<br />

cm contain one, two, or three uninscribed ruled lines (illustr. 3). Since ruled lines are visible in the<br />

top margin of the second sheet, while all other sheets from Qumran compositions have unruled<br />

top margins, it is evident that the manufacturer of this scroll used an existing ruled sheet of larger<br />

specifications than needed for the second sheet of this scroll; when preparing this scroll, he cut<br />

the sheet to the size required for the present purpose, cutting off the unruled top margin of that<br />

sheet, and using the ruled area as top margin. A similar procedure was followed for the first sheet<br />

of 4QDeutn (illustr. 15) 15 which was cut to the size of the second sheet. Additional relevant<br />

material is recorded in § d below listing the juxtaposition of unrelated sheets that must have been<br />

prepared separately.<br />

There is evidence for the existence of rolls of blank papyrus sheets at Elephantine70 and<br />

possibly also in Murabba>at. 71 These rolls consisted of sheets that had been glued together, from<br />

which the required smaller pieces were then cut off.<br />

The calculation of the number of sheets needed for copying a composition could never be<br />

precise, as evidenced by the ruled column often left uninscribed following the final inscribed<br />

column of a sheet (ch. 4g).<br />

c. Sheets<br />

Documents were written either on single pieces of leather or papyrus (a sheet or a scrap of<br />

leather) or on scrolls composed of several sheets.<br />

Short documents were written on single sheets and in rare cases on scraps of leather. For<br />

example, letters and other documentary texts written on papyrus and 4QTest (4Q175) written on<br />

leather were inscribed on single sheets. Likewise, P.Nash of the Decalogue probably consisted of<br />

only a single sheet (thus Peters, Nash, 5). The shape of some documents is irregular (neither<br />

rectangular nor square, with uneven borders); it is probable that they were inscribed on remnants<br />

70 Cf. the description of the Elephantine papyri in Porten–Yardeni, TAD 3.xiii: ‘Fresh, rectangular papyrus sheets were<br />

not stored in a pile but were glued together along their length to make a scroll. In writing a document, the scribe<br />

detached from the scroll a piece of required size.’ A similar remark with regard to the papyrus production in Egypt was<br />

made by S. Emmel, “The Christian Book in Egypt: Innovation in the Coptic Tradition,” in The Bible as Book—The<br />

Manuscript Tradition (ed. J. L. Sharpe III and K. Van Kampen; London and New Castle, Del. 1998) 35–43. Emmel<br />

remarked that many of the single-sheet documents from Egypt include a seam, where two originally separate sheets were<br />

overlapped and glued together. In other examples from the classical world, some single papyrus sheets had stitches on<br />

both sides.<br />

71 Lewis, Bar Kochba, 10: ‘Papyrus was shipped from the factories in rolls formed by gluing together the overlapping<br />

edges of consecutive sheets. A standard roll contained twenty sheets.’

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!