03.04.2013 Views

SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov

SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov

SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts from the Judean Desert 137<br />

defined by Siegel, Scribes of Qumran, 73; cf. also b. Menah≥. 31b–32a where according to R.<br />

Meir an open section should be used in mezuzot for a major content break).<br />

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br />

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br />

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br />

In most scrolls, this system reflects the largest degree of separation between sections. This<br />

system is evidenced in all texts written in the square script as well as in the paleo-Hebrew script;<br />

for the latter see, for example, the evidence relating to 4QpaleoExod m in DJD IX, 59 (TABLE 4).<br />

Not all spaces left by scribes reflect section divisions. Poor surface often necessitated that scribes leave a segment<br />

uninscribed (ch. 4i), and it is sometimes unclear whether the spaces reflect bad surface or a sense division. Thus, it<br />

is unclear why after ˆk yrjaw in 4QGen j 9–10 4 (Gen 45:15) the remainder of the line was left empty (part of the leather<br />

has peeled off in this line, but the remaining section would not have created a surface problem for the copyist).<br />

When the writing concluded near the end of the line, there was insufficient room remaining to<br />

leave a long enough space to indicate the new unit, and in such cases one of two different<br />

solutions were invoked:<br />

(i) An indentation at the beginning of the line indicates that the previous line should have<br />

ended with a space (illustrations 3 and 21). 21<br />

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br />

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br />

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br />

This system is evidenced in several texts written in the square script (illustrations 3 and 21), 21 but<br />

not in the paleo-Hebrew script; therefore, the indentation reconstructed for 4QpaleoExod m IX 31<br />

(DJD IX, 61) is unlikely.<br />

Hebrew manuscripts only employed indentations and did not use enlarged letters protruding into the margin<br />

(ekthesis), such as used in several Greek manuscripts, e.g. 8H≥evXIIgr XIX 39 (Hab 3:14); for a discussion, see<br />

APPENDIX 5.<br />

c[hlou] sele<br />

Dietrh[sa]" en rabdoi" autou kefalhn<br />

atei[cis]twn autou seisq[h]sontai tou<br />

The frequent indentations in 1QIsa a were often marked with a paragraph sign above the indentation: e.g. VII 10;<br />

X 14, 18; XIII 31; XVI 30; XXXVII 2 (scribes A and B). As in the case of the spacing in the middle of the line, the<br />

different-sized indentations were probably not intentional; accordingly, the large indentations in XXXVIII 15 and<br />

XLIV 16 probably carried the same meaning as smaller ones elsewhere.<br />

MurXII contains eight such indentations (e.g. VII 11 [Amos 7:10]; XIX 4 [Hab 3:1]; XX 16 [Zeph 2:5]).<br />

4QapocrDan ar has an indentation in col. ii 4. In 1QapGen ar XXI, XXII and 1QH a II, III, VII (Suk. = Puech X, XI,<br />

XV) these indentations were often very extensive (15–20 [2.5–3.0 cm] and 20–30 letter-spaces [5.0–6.5 cm]<br />

respectively). 4QInstr d (4Q418) likewise has large indentations at the beginnings of new sections (e.g. 69 ii 10; 126<br />

ii 11; 148 ii 4). In 1QH a col. VII (Suk. = Puech XV), the indentation is half-a-line wide and in 4QBarkhi Nafshi a<br />

(4Q434) 1 i 12, 5.5 cm in a column of 13.5 cm wide; in 4QEn c ar (4Q204) 1 vi 4.0 cm. 4QVisions of Amram g ar<br />

(4Q549) 2 7 has an indentation of 3.4 cm. Usually, however, these indentations are small. In 11QPs a they occupy<br />

sometimes merely four letter-spaces (e.g. XVI 8; XX 3, 8), in other cases some twenty letter-spaces (e.g. XXVI 4;<br />

XXVII 12), and sometimes as much as half a line (e.g. III 7; XXV 6).<br />

The unusually large indentation extending over three lines in 11QPs a XXVII 2–4 probably does not indicate the<br />

beginning of a prose section (lines 2–11) toward the end of this scroll which is almost exclusively written in poetry;<br />

rather, the indentation is due to scar tissue in the scroll (thus J. A. Sanders, DJD IV, 93).<br />

(ii) A completely empty line indicated a regular section division, illustrations 17<br />

(differing from system c below which probably denotes a greater hierarchy of division).<br />

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br />

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br />

17a, 18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!