03.04.2013 Views

SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov

SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov

SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts from the Judean Desert 251<br />

morphology of the Qumran scribal practice. See ch. 6b2, TABLE 1, and illustr. 3. We suggested<br />

that this practice provides an inde-pendent control supporting our hypothesis since the approach<br />

of the Qumran community to the divine names is known also from other indicators.<br />

A reverse examination of the texts written in the Qumran scribal practice reveals that thirtysix<br />

such texts did not use a special system for the writing of the divine names with paleo-Hebrew<br />

characters (ch. 6b2 and TABLE 2) or Tetrapuncta (below, q). It therefore seems that within the<br />

group of Qumran scribes different practices were employed for writing the divine names,<br />

possibly at different times.<br />

h. Single letters in the Cryptic A script written mainly in the margins (figs. 10.1–11 10.1 11)<br />

The evidence for single letters in the Cryptic A script designating matters of special interest<br />

relates to six texts written according to the Qumran scribal practice, all sectarian. The same<br />

phenomenon also is found in one Aramaic and three biblical texts (one of them, 1QIsa a , is written<br />

in the Qumran scribal practice). See ch. 5c3.<br />

z. Single paleo-Hebrew letters (figs. 10.12–12.2<br />

10.12 12.2)<br />

Single paleo-Hebrew letters designating matters of special interest are found in five texts written<br />

in the Qumran practice, as well as in three texts not written in that system. For details, see ch.<br />

5c4 and APPENDIX 1. The connection between the paleo-Hebrew letters and the Qumran scribal<br />

practice is less strong than in the preceding categories.<br />

q. Tetrapuncta designating the Tetragrammaton (fig. 19) 19<br />

Tetrapuncta (four dots) denoting the Tetragrammaton occur in eight texts written in the Qumran<br />

scribal practice, as well as in five texts not written in this scribal practice. See ch. 5d, TABLE 1,<br />

and illustr. 3. A connection between the Tetrapuncta and the Qumran scribal practice is probable.<br />

i. The X-sign (fig. 22) 22<br />

The X-sign, serving as a line-filler, is used in three Qumran texts written in the Qumran scribal<br />

practice: 1QpHab, 4QCommGen A (4Q252)?, 11QT b (11Q20). It also designates matters of<br />

special interest in three Qumran texts written according to the Qumran scribal practice: 1QIsa a ,<br />

4QCatena A (4Q177), 4QInstr c (4Q417). See ch. 5c5. A connection between this sign and the<br />

Qumran scribal practice is likely.<br />

k. Separation dots between words (fig. 17) 17<br />

Separation dots, written level with the tops of the letters or slightly above them, are evidenced<br />

for seven texts written according to the Qumran scribal practice and one text not written in that<br />

practice. See ch. 5c7.<br />

l. Nonfinal letters used in final position and final letters used in nonfinal position<br />

In 83 Qumran texts, nonfinal letters were written in final position. The connection between this<br />

procedure and the Qumran scribal practice is very likely (78 percent of the 83 texts), but further<br />

research is needed since the data in ch. 5g are not exhaustive.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!