SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov
SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov
SCRIBAL PRACTICES AND APPROACHE S ... - Emanuel Tov
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts from the Judean Desert 261<br />
• The great majority of the biblical scrolls written on leather are ruled, as prescribed by<br />
rabbinic sources, but so are the nonbiblical scrolls. See ch. 4a.<br />
• Bottom margins are usually larger than top margins, as prescribed by b. Menah≥. 30a, y.<br />
Meg. 1.71d, and Sof. 2.5. These conventions were followed in most biblical scrolls. See ch. 4,<br />
TABLE 19.<br />
• Supralinear additions were found in most biblical and nonbiblical scrolls, as permitted by y.<br />
Meg. 1.71c and b. Menah≥. 30b. See ch. 5f.<br />
• The division of the text into section units reflects in general terms the system prescribed by<br />
b. Shabb. 103b. See ch. 5a3.<br />
• Unstitched areas at the tops and bottoms of sheets (prescribed by b. Meg. 19b, Sof. 2.18)<br />
are found in a few texts: 4QNum b XV, 4QSapiential Work (4Q185), 11QT a (11Q19) (further<br />
research is needed in this area). See ch. 3c.<br />
b. Disagreement with rules prescribed by rabbinic literature, or rules not mentioned in that<br />
literature (rabbinic instructions pertain only to the writing of sacred texts):<br />
• Crossing out a word with a horizontal line. This practice, also known from Greek sources<br />
and not mentioned in rabbinic literature, has been identified in six biblical texts, mainly non-<br />
Masoretic. See ch. 5, TABLE 16.<br />
• Stichographic arrangement. Several Songs in the Torah are not written according to the<br />
rabbinic regulations, and various types of stichographic arrangement of the Psalms are not<br />
mentioned in rabbinic literature. See ch. 5b.<br />
• Guide dots, not mentioned in rabbinic literature, are found in many biblical texts. See ch. 4,<br />
TABLES 3 and 4.<br />
• Cancellation dots are mentioned in rabbinic sources, but not as a correction procedure. This<br />
procedure was used in several biblical scrolls. See cf. 5f.<br />
• Parenthesis signs, not mentioned in rabbinic literature as a correction procedure, are found in<br />
some biblical texts. See ch. 5c2.<br />
• The writing of biblical texts on papyrus is forbidden according to m. Meg. 2.2 and y. Meg.<br />
1.71d, while a few such papyri are known. See ch. 3a.<br />
• Against the prescription in b. Menah≥. 31b, several tears in 1QIsa a were stitched up after<br />
the leather had been inscribed. See ch. 4i.<br />
• Writing on attached patches, disallowed by Sof. 2.17, but allowed by y. Meg. 1.71d, is found<br />
in 4QpaleoExod m col. VIII. See ch. 4i.<br />
• Scribal markings of several types are found in the margins of biblical and nonbiblical texts<br />
of different types (ch. 5c2). Rabbinic literature does not explicitly forbid scribal marks, but<br />
probably they would be disallowed by the stringent copying laws. At the same time, a small<br />
number of such notations are found in MT (ch. 5c10).<br />
• Section markers of different types found in several biblical scrolls are not mentioned in<br />
rabbinic literature. See ch. 5c1.<br />
• The writing of the Tetragrammaton and other divine names in the paleo-Hebrew script as<br />
recorded in ch. 6, TABLE 1 is not explicitly forbidden in rabbinic literature. Since the use of that<br />
script was forbidden for complete biblical texts, it can also be assumed that individual words<br />
written in that script would probably be disallowed. At the same time, the concept of the<br />
sanctity of the divine names, which is behind the writing in paleo-Hebrew characters, is in<br />
agreement with y. Meg. 1.71d (cf. Sof. 4.1–8).<br />
• The remodeling of letters in 1QIsa a and in several sectarian texts is not mentioned in Soferim<br />
as a legitimate correcting procedure. See ch. 5f.