27.06.2013 Views

Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Intellectual Capital

Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Intellectual Capital

Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Intellectual Capital

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

D<strong>on</strong>ley Carringt<strong>on</strong> and Mike Tayles<br />

In evaluating measurement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC as a mediating variable table 6 presents <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> standardized path<br />

coefficients for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> paths between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mediator measurement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> comp<strong>on</strong>ents <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

dependent variable performance.<br />

Table 6: Standardized path coefficients for measurement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC<br />

Independent<br />

Variable<br />

Step 1<br />

Perceived<br />

performance<br />

Standardized Path coefficients<br />

(given if significant at 0.05 or less)<br />

Step 2<br />

Measurement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

IC<br />

Dependent variable<br />

Step 3<br />

Perceived<br />

performance<br />

Interpretati<strong>on</strong><br />

HC .220 * .092 (ns) .197 * No mediati<strong>on</strong><br />

RC .250 * -.313 * -.093 (ns) Full mediati<strong>on</strong><br />

SC .583 * .731 * .229 * Partial mediati<strong>on</strong><br />

Mediator<br />

Measurement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC .318 * Significance achieved<br />

mediati<strong>on</strong> is possible<br />

* significant at 0.05 or less<br />

Step 1 – Path coefficients between HC, RC and SC and performance<br />

Step 2 – Path coefficients between HC, RC and SC and measurement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC (mediator)<br />

Step 3 – Path coefficients between HC, RC and SC and performance with measurement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC as<br />

mediator<br />

The n<strong>on</strong>-significant path between measurement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC and HC would indicate that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is no<br />

mediatory role <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> measurement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC between HC and performance. The n<strong>on</strong>-significant path<br />

between RC and performance in step 3, while <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> paths between RC and measurement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC in step<br />

2 and between RC and performance in step 1 are significant this would indicate full mediati<strong>on</strong>. In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> SC and measurement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC being a mediator, all three paths are significant at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 0.05 or less<br />

level toge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> standardized path coefficient in step 1 being higher than in step 3 this supports<br />

a hypo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>sis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> partial mediati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

HC had a direct positive effect <strong>on</strong> Performance as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> standardized parameter estimate between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

two c<strong>on</strong>structs was 0.197 with a critical ratio <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2.124 and a p-value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 0.034. This finding<br />

corroborates that <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Youndt and Snell (2004) who reported in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir study that HC was significantly<br />

related to performance (β= 0.211, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!