Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Intellectual Capital

Helena Santos-Rodrigues et al.
better than <strong>the</strong> competitors, how to explore, deploy, combine and configure resources and capacities
on a distinct way, that gives to clients more value than <strong>the</strong> competitors (Spender & Marr, 2005; Teece,
Pisano, & Shuen, 1997). Innovation that may serve as <strong>the</strong> basis for competitive advantage
(Khazanchi, Lewis, & Boyer, 2007), is strongly linked to knowledge (Levinthal & March, 1993;
McGrath, 2001; Peng, Schroeder, & Shah, 2008).
Intellectual capital <strong>of</strong> a company is defined as all non-monetary and non-physical resources that are
fully or partly controlled by <strong>the</strong> organisation and that contribute to <strong>the</strong> value creation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>
organisation (G. Roos, Pike, & Fernström, 2005). The concept <strong>of</strong> intellectual capital helps to let
intangible resources <strong>of</strong> a company be measured, communicated and interpreted (see: Andriessen,
2004) (G. Roos, et al., 2005). Even though <strong>the</strong> debate about <strong>the</strong> components <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Intellectual
Capital is still partially open, <strong>the</strong> Intellectual Capital components, recognized and mainly accepted in
most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> literature, are human capital, structural capital and relational capital (Edvinsson & Malone,
1997; I.A.D.E., 2003; Santos Rodrigues, 2008).
In this sense, <strong>the</strong> human capital represent <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge and talent which is embodied in
people who make up <strong>the</strong> organization, representing it know-how, <strong>the</strong> capacities, <strong>the</strong> knowledge,
talent, competence, attitude, intellectual agility, creativity, and o<strong>the</strong>rs (Santos Rodrigues, 2008)
(Bontis & Fitz-enz, 2002; Edvinsson & Malone, 1997; I.A.D.E., 2003; Goran Roos & Roos, 1997).
Structural capital is defined as knowledge, skills, experiences and information, institutionalized,
codified, and used by databases, patents, manuals, structures, systems, routines and processes
(Youndt, Subramaniam, & Snell, 2004).
On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r side, through relation with business partners, firms can gain access to external
knowledge, and <strong>the</strong>re’s some evidence, for instance, that spatial proximity between organizations
facilitates <strong>the</strong> interactions (Torre & Rallet, 2005), and, consequently firms could exchange more
knowledge and eventually have a higher innovative performance (Weterings & Boschma, 2009). Pike
et al. (2005) cite various empirical studies that show that encouraging and maintaining <strong>the</strong> existence
knowledge flows beyond <strong>the</strong> boundaries <strong>of</strong> enterprise and across different scientific areas, becomes
more productive efforts <strong>of</strong> R & D.
Innovation that may serve as <strong>the</strong> basis for competitive advantage (Khazanchi, et al., 2007), is strongly
linked to knowledge (Levinthal & March, 1993; McGrath, 2001; Peng, et al., 2008). Peng et al. (2008)
describe <strong>the</strong> innovation-knowledge linkage as <strong>the</strong> essence <strong>of</strong> innovation has been characterized as
pursuit <strong>of</strong> new knowledge for discovery. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> alignment <strong>of</strong> knowledge, as an intangible
resource, with <strong>the</strong> innovation strategy could enhance performance and culminate in a competitive
advantage. The innovative firm is one that has implemented an innovation (product, process,
marketing or organisational innovation) during <strong>the</strong> period under review (OCDE/UE, 2005).
3. Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis
Knowledge assets <strong>of</strong> enterprises are positively related to <strong>the</strong>ir level <strong>of</strong> innovation (Thornhill, 2006).
So, to create new or better products, firms must reallocate resources, combine new resources or
combine existing resources both inside and outside firms in new ways (Tsai & Ghoshal, 1998).
Thus, we predict <strong>the</strong> following:
H1: Human capital is positively related with <strong>the</strong> innovativeness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> firm.
H2: Structural capital is positively related with <strong>the</strong> innovativeness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> firm.
H3: Relational capital is positively related with <strong>the</strong> innovativeness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> firm.
Figure 1 display our hypo<strong>the</strong>sised relationship between intellectual capital and <strong>the</strong> tree types <strong>of</strong>
innovativeness considered.
379