27.06.2013 Views

Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Intellectual Capital

Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Intellectual Capital

Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Intellectual Capital

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Deborah Branswijck and Patricia Everaert<br />

indicate that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> standard deviati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> observati<strong>on</strong>s in each group <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> similar magnitude. This also<br />

follows from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Levene’s test <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> homogeneity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> variances. Hence, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> equality <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

variance is satisfied. Hypo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>sis 2(a) is accepted whereas hypo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>sis 2(b) is not statistically<br />

significant at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 0.05 significance level.<br />

Table 3: ANOVA table for IC disclosure by period<br />

Table 4 presents <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> paired sample t-test for hypo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>sis 3 that c<strong>on</strong>firms that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re exists a relati<strong>on</strong>ship<br />

between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> amount <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC disclosure that a company reports in its prospectus and its annual report<br />

following to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> IPO. On average <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC disclosure in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> annual report is 10 units lower compared to<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> prospectus.<br />

Table 4: Paired sample t-test<br />

5. C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong><br />

The objective <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this study is dual. On <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>e hand we want to determine <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> relati<strong>on</strong>ship between IC<br />

disclosure in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> prospectus and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> annual report and <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r hand we want to investigate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> recent ec<strong>on</strong>omic disturbance <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC disclosure in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> prospectus as well as<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> annual report. Each corporate document was manually scanned for IC informati<strong>on</strong> based <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

index developed by Bukh et al (2004). The first hypo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>sis which states that a more than average<br />

level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC disclosure in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> prospectus results in a more than average level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC disclosure in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

subsequent annual report due to disclosure commitment.c<strong>on</strong>firmed is c<strong>on</strong>firmed. In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> next research<br />

questi<strong>on</strong> we determined <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> recent ec<strong>on</strong>omic disturbance <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC disclosure in<br />

both prospectus and annual report. Only <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> prospectus was found to be influenced by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> financial<br />

crisis. Lastly, we looked at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC disclosure in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> prospectus <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC<br />

disclosure in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> annual report. This impact is significant.<br />

References<br />

Amir, E. and Lev, B. (1996), “Value-relevance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> n<strong>on</strong>financial informati<strong>on</strong>: <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> wireless communicati<strong>on</strong> industry”,<br />

Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Accounting and Ec<strong>on</strong>omics, Vol 22, pp. 3-30.<br />

Baker S.L., (2006), “Dummy variables (to represent categories) and time series”, University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> South Carolina.<br />

Beattie, V. (1999) Business Reporting: The inevitable change, Institute <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Chartered Accountants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Scotland,<br />

Edinburgh.<br />

Beattie, V. and Thoms<strong>on</strong> S.J. (2007), “Lifting <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lid <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tent analysis to investigate intellectual<br />

capital disclosures”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 31, pp. 129-163.<br />

B<strong>on</strong>tis, N. (2002), IC disclosures in Canadian Corporati<strong>on</strong>s, McMaster University, Hamilt<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Bozzolan, S., Favotto, F., and Ricceri, F. (2003), “Italian annual intellectual capital disclosure”, Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>Intellectual</strong> <strong>Capital</strong>, Vol. 4, No.4, pp. 543-558.<br />

Brown, A., Osborn, T., Chan, J. and Jaganathan, V. (2005), “Managing intellectual capital”, Research-Technology<br />

Managemement, Vol. 48, No. 6, pp. 34-41.<br />

Brüggen, A., Vergauwen, P. and Dao, M., (2009), “Determinants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> intellectual capital disclosure: evidence from<br />

Australia”, Management Decisi<strong>on</strong>, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 233-245.<br />

Bukh, P. (2003) “The relevance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IC disclosure: A paradox?”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,<br />

Vol. 16, No.1, pp. 49-56.<br />

507

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!