27.10.2013 Views

FEI-FEVI 2010 EEC Report filed March 31, 2011 - FortisBC

FEI-FEVI 2010 EEC Report filed March 31, 2011 - FortisBC

FEI-FEVI 2010 EEC Report filed March 31, 2011 - FortisBC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FORTISBC ENERGY INC. AND FORTISBC ENERGY (VANCOUVER ISLAND) INC.<br />

<strong>2010</strong> ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION ANNUAL REPORT<br />

• Support government policy on energy efficiency and GHG emissions reductions,<br />

especially in relation to efficient building strategies <strong>31</strong> through incentives and education to<br />

customers and other industry stakeholders.<br />

5.2 <strong>2010</strong> Residential High Carbon Fuel Switching Program Area Results<br />

The <strong>2010</strong> High Carbon Fuel Switching program, Switch N’ Shrink, resulted in the replacement of<br />

178 heating systems through a cost effective program with a TRC score over 1.2, as outlined in<br />

Table 5-1. Further analysis based on the amount of oil displaced reveals that customers<br />

reduced their fuel costs by $596,000 32 over the lifetime of the measure, thereby reducing over<br />

1,170 tons of GHG emissions. Please note natural gas savings are negative for this program<br />

since the addition of these customers is building load.<br />

Program<br />

Table 5-1: High Carbon Fuel Switching <strong>2010</strong> Results<br />

Incentives & Non-Incentive<br />

Expenditure ($000s)<br />

NPV Energy Savings (GJ) TRC<br />

<strong>FEI</strong> <strong>FEVI</strong> Total <strong>FEI</strong> <strong>FEVI</strong> Total <strong>FEI</strong> <strong>FEVI</strong><br />

Swtich 'N' Shrink 75 225 299 (6,103) (32,529) (38,632) 1.2 1.4<br />

In addition to appliance replacement, this program met <strong>EEC</strong> program objectives by educating<br />

customers and trades about the benefits of replacing higher carbon heating systems with<br />

energy efficient appliances. These benefits include the reduction of ongoing fuel costs,<br />

improved air quality, and decreased environmental risk associated with oil tanks and fuel<br />

transport. The primary program benefit was supporting government policy initiatives to reduce<br />

GHG emissions.<br />

5.3 <strong>2011</strong> Residential High Carbon Fuel Switching Program Area Outlook<br />

The <strong>2011</strong> outlook for the High Carbon Fuel Switching program area at this time consists only of<br />

the residential Switch N’ Shrink program although. The Companies are assessing other<br />

opportunities for this program area in the coming months. By building on <strong>2010</strong> program<br />

awareness, program participation is expected to more than double for a total of 420 participants<br />

as outlined in Table 5-2 for the <strong>2011</strong> forecast. The <strong>2011</strong> program cost effectiveness is higher<br />

than <strong>2010</strong> due to decreased marketing expenditures required in the second year and the higher<br />

avoided cost of oil that is forecasted to increase from $22 per GJ in <strong>2010</strong> economic models, to<br />

$25 per GJ in <strong>2011</strong> based on Vancouver, BC pricing. 33<br />

<strong>31</strong><br />

BC Energy Efficient Buildings Strategy: More Action, Less Energy. BC Ministry of Energy and Mines Publication,<br />

2008.<br />

32<br />

www.kentmarketingservices.com Prepared by MJ Ervin, Kent Marketing Services, for source of Vancouver fuel<br />

oil prices. For economic modeling, <strong>2010</strong> cost of oil was assumed to be $22.01 and <strong>2011</strong> cost of oil was assumed<br />

to be $25.39.<br />

33<br />

ibid<br />

SECTION 5: HIGH CARBON FUEL SWITCHING PROGRAMS Page 100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!