27.10.2013 Views

FEI-FEVI 2010 EEC Report filed March 31, 2011 - FortisBC

FEI-FEVI 2010 EEC Report filed March 31, 2011 - FortisBC

FEI-FEVI 2010 EEC Report filed March 31, 2011 - FortisBC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.0 AMORTISATION OF <strong>EEC</strong> EXPENDITURES<br />

Terasen proposes to amortise its <strong>EEC</strong> expenditures, including both program, and incentive and<br />

rebate costs, over a 20 year period, based on a calculation of the 22.5 years as the weighted<br />

average measurable life of the proposed appliance and energy system installations. Terasen’s<br />

weighted average calculation is based on achieving estimated volumes, mix and lives of<br />

installations for the various measures being proposed. (Exhibit B‐1, p. 80, and Appendix 40.2)<br />

45<br />

<strong>FortisBC</strong> and BC Hydro each use 10 year amortisation periods. (Exhibit B‐2, p. 95) Terasen states:<br />

“…research failed to uncover any examples where utilities are using or proposing amortisation<br />

periods as long as 20 years” for DSM programs. (Exhibit B‐2, p. 97)<br />

Commission Determination<br />

The Commission Panel rejects the 20 year amortisation period proposed by Terasen. The<br />

Commission panel considers the underlying forecast assumptions on which the Terasen<br />

methodology is based to be inherently uncertain, and deserving little weight. The Commission<br />

Panel does consider that a ten year amortisation period provides a reasonable balance, considering<br />

both the DSM objectives and customer impact. Terasen is directed to base its amortisation of<br />

approved <strong>EEC</strong> expenditures over periods not to exceed 10 years.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!