27.10.2013 Views

FEI-FEVI 2010 EEC Report filed March 31, 2011 - FortisBC

FEI-FEVI 2010 EEC Report filed March 31, 2011 - FortisBC

FEI-FEVI 2010 EEC Report filed March 31, 2011 - FortisBC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.0 BACKGROUND AND REGULATORY PROCESS<br />

1.1 The Application<br />

On May 28, 2008 Terasen Gas Inc. (“TGI”) and Terasen Gas (Vancouver Island) Inc. (“TGVI”)<br />

(collectively “Terasen”) <strong>filed</strong> its Energy Efficiency and Conservation (“<strong>EEC</strong>”) Programs Application<br />

(“Application”) with the British Columbia Utilities Commission (“the Commission”).<br />

In the Application, Terasen requested an order or orders approving the following:<br />

• Increases of <strong>EEC</strong> expenditures in the period 2008‐<strong>2010</strong> to $46.944 million for TGI and<br />

$9.667 million for TGVI, a combined total of $56.6 million;<br />

• Capitalisation of incremental <strong>EEC</strong> expenditures as a regulatory asset deferral account on an<br />

after tax basis and amortisation of the account over 20 years;<br />

• An increase in the amortisation period to 20 years for incentive amounts that are added to<br />

deferral accounts for 2008 and 2009 as part of the 2008‐2009 extension of the 2004‐2007<br />

TGI PBR Settlement Agreement (“TGI PBR Extended Settlement”) approved by Order G‐33‐<br />

07 and the 2008‐2009 extension of the 2006‐2007 TGVI Revenue Requirements Settlement<br />

Agreement (“TGVI RR Extended Settlement”) approved by Order G‐34‐07;<br />

• Changes to the benefit‐cost analysis undertaken to evaluate <strong>EEC</strong> measures as outlined<br />

below:<br />

o Implementation of a portfolio approach to benefit‐cost analysis such that the Total<br />

Resource Cost (“TRC”) test for all programs combined must return an overall<br />

combined result of one or more;<br />

o Elimination of the requirement to include free‐riders in benefit‐cost tests;<br />

o Inclusion of the benefits of savings associated with implementation of a regulation<br />

as a result of <strong>EEC</strong> programs aimed at preparing the marketplace for the introduction<br />

of regulation of minimum efficiency levels in equipment, buildings or energy<br />

systems<br />

o Inclusion of the impact of carbon‐pricing as one of the inputs to the benefit‐cost<br />

tests;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!