27.10.2013 Views

FEI-FEVI 2010 EEC Report filed March 31, 2011 - FortisBC

FEI-FEVI 2010 EEC Report filed March 31, 2011 - FortisBC

FEI-FEVI 2010 EEC Report filed March 31, 2011 - FortisBC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Commission staff accepts that such determination will occur if the Commission Panel approves the<br />

Settlement Agreement.<br />

2. Item 13‐Alternative Energy Solutions<br />

2<br />

Terasen Gas added 9 enhanced sales and business development staff in 2009 estimated to cost $1.35 million<br />

and proposes increases of $3.0 million in <strong>2010</strong> for an additional 10 enhanced sales and business<br />

development staff including $1.1 million for consultants and studies and a further $0.6 million in <strong>2011</strong> for 4<br />

enhanced sales and business development staff (BCUC IR 1.72.2 and IR 2.96.2 to 2.96.4; IR 1.114.7). The<br />

number of customers are expected to increase between 1.0 to 1.1 percent from 2009 to <strong>2011</strong>, but the level<br />

of spending in Customer Solutions and Services increases by 17 percent, 27 percent and 8 percent<br />

respectively from 2009 to <strong>2011</strong> (BCUC IR 1.96.3).<br />

The New Energy Solutions Deferral Account is to capture direct costs, sales and marketing O&M and other<br />

development costs by timesheets or other direct charge and an overhead allocation. In Commission staff’s<br />

view, due to the modest growth in customer additions from 2009 to <strong>2011</strong>, the additional enhanced sales<br />

and business development staff were primarily hired in 2009 to <strong>2011</strong> to develop and market Alternative<br />

Energy Solutions. The use of timesheets, direct charges and overhead allocations may result in a proper<br />

reallocation of costs from the gas utility to the New Energy Solutions Deferral Account.<br />

The down time or idle time that will likely be experienced while the Alternative Energy is being marketed<br />

may not be captured by the timesheet allocation and could remain as a cost to the gas utility. In<br />

Commission staff’s view, it would be preferable to directly charge the fully loaded cost of the additional<br />

enhanced sales and business development staff and the costs of consultants and studies to the New Energy<br />

Solutions Deferral Account to avoid any of these costs being borne by natural gas customers.<br />

If Terasen Gas is able to demonstrate that the use of timesheets, direct charges and overhead allocations<br />

would result in none of the costs that are incurred for Alternative Energy Solutions including down time and<br />

the costs of consultants and studies to be borne by gas customers, then Commission staff’s concern is<br />

addressed.<br />

3. Item 14‐Natural Gas for Vehicles (“NGV”)<br />

APPENDIX A<br />

to Order G-141-09<br />

Page 106 of 110<br />

Terasen Gas proposes to treat as general O&M, rather than track separately, NGV marketing and project<br />

development costs incurred prior to signing a contract with a customer for compression and refuelling<br />

service (BCUC IR 1.21.1).<br />

Commission staff attempted to obtain information on the NGV marketing costs that are currently incurred<br />

through information requests, but were unsuccessful. In Commission staff’s view, information on the<br />

incremental marketing costs being incurred will be required if Terasen Gas, during <strong>2010</strong> and <strong>2011</strong>, applies<br />

…/3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!