03.10.2014 Views

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL<br />

18 SEPTEMBER 2012<br />

Summary<br />

Based on the surveys, door counts and various adjustment factors, the Design Parking<br />

Requirement for the WISC is 89 bays in excess. The rationale behind this argument is<br />

considered reasonable.<br />

The Assessment indicates that the introduction <strong>of</strong> Sunday trading in Perth will result in<br />

a spreading <strong>of</strong> the demand for shopping. Based on trends from a similar sized<br />

shopping centre in the eastern states (where Sunday trading occurs already), the peak<br />

parking demand on Thursday would decrease by approximately 7%. As such, the<br />

peak parking demand (which is based on surveys when Sunday trading was not in<br />

operation) is considered a worst case scenario.<br />

The proposed development is considered to meet the Statement <strong>of</strong> Intent for the Retail<br />

Commercial Precinct as referenced earlier in the report. The proposed land use is consistent<br />

with, and could in fact be considered less detrimental to the amenity <strong>of</strong> the locality, than an<br />

Automatic Car Wash, which is a preferred use with Precinct 1. The proposed manual car<br />

wash will create an additional service available to customers <strong>of</strong> the shopping centre and<br />

create additional employment within the locality. The proposed development is not<br />

considered to reduce the degree <strong>of</strong> accessibility to and from the centre, including pedestrian<br />

access. The application is accordingly recommended for approval subject to conditions.<br />

<strong>Stirling</strong> Alliance Comments<br />

The application is located within the <strong>Stirling</strong> <strong>City</strong> Centre and was consequently referred to<br />

the <strong>Stirling</strong> Alliance for their comments, as follows:-<br />

"The subject site is located within ‘Precinct 1’ <strong>of</strong> Town Planning Scheme No. 38 and<br />

the ‘Southern Precinct’ <strong>of</strong> the Draft <strong>Stirling</strong> <strong>City</strong> Centre Structure plan. While a manual<br />

car was is not a preferred or contemplated use under TPS No. 38, an ‘automatic’ car<br />

wash is a preferred use, and so the proposed land use is considered appropriate.<br />

While the nature <strong>of</strong> the proposed development is not entirely consistent with the vision<br />

for the <strong>Stirling</strong> <strong>City</strong> Centre outlined in the Draft Structure Plan, given the small scale <strong>of</strong><br />

the proposed development, there are no objections to the proposal."<br />

Petition opposing development<br />

The <strong>City</strong> acknowledges that the signatories <strong>of</strong> the petition object to the proposed<br />

development, on the grounds that the development will increase traffic in the local streets.<br />

As stated in the applicant’s submission, the business model for the development relies upon<br />

the majority <strong>of</strong> users <strong>of</strong> the car wash being patrons who are visiting the shopping centre.<br />

The <strong>City</strong> accepts this proposition, and the resultant outcome that the proposed development<br />

will not result in additional traffic visiting the shopping centre as a result <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />

development.<br />

Policy and Legislative Implications<br />

Should the Council refuse the application for development approval, the applicant may have<br />

the right to have the decision reviewed in accordance with Part 14 <strong>of</strong> the Planning and<br />

Development Act 2005.<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!