03.10.2014 Views

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

minutes - City of Stirling

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL<br />

18 SEPTEMBER 2012<br />

Design Element<br />

Complies<br />

'Acceptable<br />

Development'<br />

OR<br />

'Performance<br />

Criteria'<br />

Assessment<br />

Comment<br />

4 Open Space <br />

43.2% Open Space in<br />

lieu <strong>of</strong> 45% is proposed.<br />

5<br />

Access and<br />

Parking<br />

<br />

Complies<br />

6 Site Works <br />

Complies<br />

7 Building Height <br />

The dwelling proposes a<br />

wall height <strong>of</strong> 6.4m in<br />

lieu <strong>of</strong> the required 6.0m<br />

as required by Council<br />

Policy.<br />

8 Privacy <br />

9 Design for Climate <br />

10 Incidental <br />

11 Special Purpose <br />

Complies<br />

Complies<br />

Complies<br />

Complies<br />

R-Code Level 2 Assessment – Performance Criteria<br />

Design Element<br />

R-Codes<br />

Performance Criteria<br />

Subclause<br />

Satisfies<br />

Performance<br />

Criteria<br />

Does Not<br />

Satisfy<br />

Performance<br />

Criteria<br />

2. Streetscape 6.2.6 Sightlines at<br />

Vehicle<br />

Access Points<br />

and Street<br />

Corners<br />

P6 Walls or fences to<br />

primary or<br />

secondary streets,<br />

rights-<strong>of</strong>-way or<br />

communal streets<br />

so that adequate<br />

sightlines are<br />

provided at vehicle<br />

access points.<br />

<br />

The reduced truncation is<br />

considered acceptable as<br />

the proposed front fence has<br />

a high degree <strong>of</strong><br />

permeability, and the piers<br />

are only 350mm wide,<br />

ensuring adequate sightlines<br />

are maintained.<br />

There are no footpaths<br />

running along the front <strong>of</strong> the<br />

subject site, so pedestrian<br />

traffic will not be at risk.<br />

The issue was discussed<br />

with Engineering Design and<br />

the proposed variation was<br />

deemed permissible.<br />

216

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!